<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with metallica and rock</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/metallica+rock</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'metallica' and 'rock' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:20:42 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:20:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2430/</link>
		<description> Wow! &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.zdnet.com/features/metallicatestimony/&quot;&gt; Lars Ulrich makes a valid point!&lt;/a&gt; Who&apos;d a thunk it? While he still fails to notice the obvious benefits the Nap&apos; provides, or make amends for attacking his own fans (or at the very least realized that it&apos;s not Congress&apos; place to meddle), Lars has gone ahead and more clearly illuminated his own point of view. Now if only he could have STARTED his argument a few months ago with such calm and coherent points (as opposed to grandiose posturing), this whole Napster debate would be a bit more...um...SOLVED by now?!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2430</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:20:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>larsulrich</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<dc:creator>NickBarat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1625/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsbytes.com/pubNews/00/148796.html"&gt;Napster did it-&lt;/a&gt; blocked more than 317,000 names used by its subscribers, which have been identified by the hard rock band, Metallica, as allegedly infringing on the copyrights of the group&apos;s music.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1625</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2000 09:29:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<dc:creator>TuxHeDoh</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1604/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;amp;item=327448958"&gt;Metallica&apos;s Integrity for sale!&lt;/a&gt; Don&apos;t know if what&apos;s left of it is worth the price though.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1604</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2000 19:15:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>metal</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<dc:creator>valerie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1520/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-1798138.html?tag=st.ne.1002.thed.1005-200-1798138"&gt;Napster users are named in the latest battle&lt;/a&gt; Some have admitted to being a criminal while others say who cares? Metallica sure doesn&apos;t seem like it is going to back down. The article says Metallica is scheduled to chat with fans online at the Artistsdirect.com Web site to explain its fight against Napster. So is any action going to be taken against the fans who want the music?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1520</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2000 22:53:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>downloads</category>
		<category>metallica</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>napster</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


