<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with microchips</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/microchips</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'microchips' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:05:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:05:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Silicon art</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45844/Silicon%2Dart</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://microscopy.fsu.edu/creatures/index.html"&gt;Silicon Zoo:&lt;/a&gt; Where&apos;s Waldo? &lt;a href=&quot;http://microscopy.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/waldo.html&quot;&gt;Hiding&lt;/a&gt; in the silicon patterns of a computer chip. Michael Davidson has found a collection of microscopic art hidden by chip designers. This practice has been going on for decades, and the hidden images range from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://microscopy.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/mickey.html&quot;&gt;iconic&lt;/a&gt; to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://microscopy.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/wedding.html&quot;&gt;commemorative&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://microscopy.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/mistert.html&quot;&gt;the bizarre&lt;/a&gt;. Be sure to read &lt;a href=&quot;http://microscopy.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/disclaimer.html&quot;&gt;the fine print&lt;/a&gt;. [See also this &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/What+art+is+hiding+on+your+microchip/2100-1006_3-5893374.html?part=rss&amp;tag=5893374&amp;subj=news&quot;&gt;CNET story&lt;/a&gt;] (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000220063115/&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45844</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:05:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>microchips</category>
		<category>microphotography</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<dc:creator>stopgap</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tracking your tires</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22984/Tracking%2Dyour%2Dtires</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/269/1/1/"&gt;Michelin plans to embed trackable microchips in tires.&lt;/a&gt; The US tire manufacturer has begun testing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/207#anchor#002&quot;&gt;electronic transponders&lt;/a&gt; that  are &quot;strictly for identification and tracking. &quot;   Congress passed the &lt;a href=&quot;http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:As5QIzdSMIsC:www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-01/SAE/SAE2001/Weinstein.PDF&quot;&gt;TREAD   Act &lt;/a&gt;(Transportation, Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation) in response to the massive recall of Firestone tires on Ford Explorers and requires tire makers to more closely track their tires.  Is this a legitimate use of technology, or does it present another opportunity to erode privacy? [&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/21/2332252&amp;mode=nested&amp;tid=158&quot;&gt;Via /.&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22984</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2003 09:13:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>chips</category>
		<category>microchips</category>
		<category>tires</category>
		<category>tracking</category>
		<category>transponders</category>
		<dc:creator>maniactown</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16151/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,51575,00.html"&gt;FDA has ruled that implantable microchips dont need to be regulated.&lt;/a&gt; It looks like, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,50187,00.html&quot;&gt;Jacobs&lt;/a&gt; family can now have their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adsx.com/prodservpart/verichip.html&quot;&gt;VeriChips&lt;/a&gt;. Does anyone else think that some kind of regulations of these devices is called needed? (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/columnists/gmsv/&quot;&gt;GMSV&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16151</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2002 18:47:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FDA</category>
		<category>implants</category>
		<category>microchips</category>
		<category>regulations</category>
		<category>tracking</category>
		<category>VeriChips</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>justlooking</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15164/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/nm/20020225/bs_nm/tech_ibm_dc_21"&gt;IBM gives Moore&apos;s Law a punch in the face&lt;/a&gt; by developing a 110GHz silicon germanium microchip. Only for use in ultra hi-tech environments right now (network infrastructure, military, etc.), of course. What other things could these processors be useful for? Finding vaccines? Genome mapping? SETI? And how many years before they&apos;re mass-producible and inexpensive enough for consumer use?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15164</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:55:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ibm</category>
		<category>microchips</category>
		<category>mooreslaw</category>
		<category>silicongermanium</category>
		<dc:creator>andnbsp</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


