<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with microsoft and AOL</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/microsoft+AOL</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'microsoft' and 'AOL' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2003 09:39:42 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2003 09:39:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Death of Netscape?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26099/The%2DDeath%2Dof%2DNetscape</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2003/05/29/technology/microsoft/index.htm"&gt;AOL and Microsoft settle AOL&apos;s Netscape lawsuit.&lt;/a&gt; AOL gets $750 million and keeps IE as its default browser for seven years. Is this the &lt;a href=&quot;http://whatdoiknow.org/archives/000981.php&quot;&gt;death of Netscape&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26099</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2003 09:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>BrokenLink</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>Lawsuit</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Netscape</category>
		<dc:creator>timeistight</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Two Faces of AOL and Microsoft&apos;s Spam Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25675/The%2DTwo%2DFaces%2Dof%2DAOL%2Dand%2DMicrosofts%2DSpam%2DPolicies</link>
		<description> Perhaps you&apos;ve seen the new MSN commercials that use M$&apos;s &quot;spam-blocking&quot; technology to support their ISP service. Maybe you&apos;ve read fluff pieces like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;node=&amp;contentId=A37742-2003Feb20&amp;#0172;Found=true&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;, where AOL and Microsoft execs are allowed to wax poetic about their deep anti-spam convictions:

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;&apos;I get spam too, and I am as fed up with it as all of our members are,&apos; AOL chief executive Jonathan F. Miller said yesterday.&quot; 

&quot;&apos;To help keep intruders at bay,&apos; Microsoft said, &quot;we must all do our part.&apos;&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

So what&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/5476163.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; all about?

&quot;&apos;AOL and Microsoft argue there is a place for legitimate unsolicited e-mail in the marketplace,&apos; said Marc Berejka, Microsoft&apos;s senior director of public policy.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25675</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 09:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericaOnline</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>Email</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>ISP</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Policy</category>
		<category>SPAM</category>
		<dc:creator>Pinwheel</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Microsoft still king of the hill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22026/Microsoft%2Dstill%2Dking%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dhill</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,740753,00.asp"&gt;Liberty Alliance conceded defeat&lt;/a&gt;  last week to &lt;a href=&quot;http://wwww.passport.net/&quot;&gt;Microsoft .NET Passport&lt;/a&gt;. AOL, a key player in Liberty Alliance, just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betanews.com/article.php3?sid=1038832383&quot;&gt;disbanded it&apos;s Magic Carpet team&lt;/a&gt;, whose memebers were also the AOL point people for the Sun-led &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.projectliberty.org/&quot;&gt;Liberty Alliance Project&lt;/a&gt;, and played a very active role in its progression. How long do we wait until they start complaining about Microsoft having a monopoly in unified authentication systems?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22026</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:26:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.net</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>authentication</category>
		<category>libertyalliance</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>monopolies</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14083/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20020122/tc/tech_aol_microsoft_dc_3.html"&gt;AOL&apos;s Netscape sues Microsoft &lt;/a&gt; for damage done to its Netscape Internet browser by violations of antitrust law found in a separate government case against the software giant.  &quot;I don&apos;t see this case as primarily about money. I see it as primarily about injunctive relief,&apos;&apos; said Steve Salop, a Georgetown University law professor.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14083</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 19:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>browsers</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>IE</category>
		<category>injunctions</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>InternetExplorer</category>
		<category>internetlaw</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>monopolies</category>
		<category>netscape</category>
		<dc:creator>hitsman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9370/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&amp;amp;c=Article&amp;amp;cid=FT3YDYM8RPC&amp;amp;live=true&amp;amp;tagid=IXLYK5HZ8CC"&gt;Microsoft vs. AOL&lt;/a&gt; Gee, who do you root for in this one?  Personally, I&apos;d love to see a Pay-Per-View kickboxing match between Steve Case and Bill Gates.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9370</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:22:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>BillGates</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>SteveCase</category>
		<dc:creator>Rastafari</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9270/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washtech.com/news/media/11421-1.html"&gt;&quot;[Gigantic Media Company]&apos;s actions are unprecedented and completely anti-consumer,&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  said
                  [Other Gigantic Media Company] spokesman Vivek Varma. &quot;[Gigantic Media Company] is paying computer makers to
                  eliminate consumer choice, forcing people to select the most expensive
                  service in the industry.&quot; 

Uh, pot, kettle left a message for you: you&apos;re black.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9270</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:27:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>VivekVarma</category>
		<dc:creator>lawtalkinguy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5291/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/01/15/010115hnaoletc.xml?p=br&amp;amp;s=5"&gt;Unmitigated Gall dept.&lt;/a&gt; AOL calls for the breakup of Microsoft because monopolies are a bad thing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5291</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>monopolies</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4880/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-4175384.html"&gt;Gates worried about AOL&apos;s dominance of IM market.&lt;/a&gt; So what does he do, he gets on the phone to the FCC. That&apos;s right, Bill wants the governement to intervene to prevent a company from dominating a market. Umm... Bill what the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/FREEDOMTOINNOVATE/default.htm&quot;&gt;Freedom to innovate&lt;/a&gt; which you are so &lt;a href=&quot;http://www0.mercurycenter.com/business/microsoft/trial/filings/gates060700.htm&quot;&gt;worried&lt;/a&gt; about.

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4880</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:57:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>billgates</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3215/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://preview.msn.com/"&gt;Does anyone really dig the new MSN?&lt;/a&gt; I am not a member of the Church of Microsoft but I do really like what they have done with the new MSN.  I&apos;m not talking about just the web site but the overall experience with the MSN Preview 2.0.  I think they may be in a position to really give AOL a run for the money.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3215</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2000 15:17:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<dc:creator>Brilliantcrank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2807/</link>
		<description> Love those open &lt;a href = &quot;http://www.sonicnet.com/news/archive/story.jhtml?id=1122981&quot;&gt;instant messaging&lt;/a&gt; standards.

Rather than use their own servers or a decentralized approach, &lt;a href = &quot;http://www.aimster.com&quot;&gt;Aimster&lt;/a&gt; offers peer to peer file sharing services by using the existing AOL and Microsoft Networking infrastructures.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2807</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 22:19:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>im</category>
		<category>instantmessaging</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/tc/zd/story.html?s=v/zd/19990726/tc/19990726348"&gt;AOL and Microsoft are resorting to playground antics.&lt;/a&gt; I downloaded the new MS messenger when it came out last Thursday, and I&apos;ve already gotten three patches for it, each time it works with AOL users for just a few hours. I wonder how long they&apos;ll continue the dueling banjos thing.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.57</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 1999 21:25:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aim</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>im</category>
		<category>messenger</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/52/</link>
		<description> Hello AOL? It&apos;s Microsoft, we&apos;ve come to &lt;a href=&apos;http://messenger.msn.com/&apos;&gt;crush your Instant Messenger&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,1999:site.52</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 1999 21:02:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aim</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>instantmessenger</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


