<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with microsoft and Google</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/microsoft+Google</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'microsoft' and 'Google' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:00:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:00:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Yes, Sir, this Is War!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83225/Yes%2DSir%2Dthis%2DIs%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2009/jul09/07-13Office2010WPCPR.mspx&quot;&gt;Microsoft Office 2010&lt;/a&gt; - for free, on the web.  Yeah, you heard me right. &lt;em&gt;&quot;The company also announced that Office Web applications will be available in three ways: through Windows Live, where more than 400 million consumers will have access to Office Web applications at no cost; on-premises for all Office volume licensing customers including more than 90 million Office annuity customers; and via Microsoft Online Services, where customers will be able to purchase a subscription as part of a hosted offering.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;


Not to be outdone by Google, who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/83082/Of-course-you-realize-this-means-war&quot;&gt;recently announced it was trying to take a bite out of Windows&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=writely&amp;passive=true&amp;nui=1&amp;continue=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2F&amp;followup=http%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2F&amp;ltmpl=homepage&amp;rm=false&quot;&gt;not to mention Office&lt;/a&gt;, Microsoft has decided to offer a web version of Office 2010 for free - and &lt;a href=&quot;http://bigtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/13/microsoft-office-to-go-online-for-free/&quot;&gt;it will even support non-IE browsers&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83225</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:00:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Cloud</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>hellfrozeover</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Office</category>
		<dc:creator>Muddler</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Of course you realize, this means war!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83082/Of%2Dcourse%2Dyou%2Drealize%2Dthis%2Dmeans%2Dwar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html"&gt;Google Chrome OS:&lt;/a&gt; Google says it will release a new operating system, built around its Chrome browser, which will be open source and will initially be targeted at netbooks. Shipment is expected second half of 2010. No response yet from Microsoft. This is the biggest shot across the bow of Microsoft since Navigator and OS/2 and Java. Gates is retired now. I wonder if Ballmer knows how to cope with an existential challenge? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83082</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:10:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Chrome</category>
		<category>ChromeOS</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>netbook</category>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate Pickle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gang Bing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82087/Gang%2DBing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bing.com"&gt;Microsoft&apos;s new search engine, Bing, goes beta.&lt;/a&gt; Cribbed from live.com, the layout for bing is... strangely familiar. &lt;a href=&quot;http://mashable.com/2009/06/01/bing-opens-up-live/&quot;&gt;Early reviews&lt;/a&gt; are mixed, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/05/hands-on-with-microsofts-new-search-to-bing-or-not-to-bing.ars&quot;&gt;with mixed results&lt;/a&gt;, mostly noting that the results less useful than google, especially when it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bing.com/search?q=google&quot;&gt;comes to google&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82087</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:46:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bing</category>
		<category>engine</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>live</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>seo</category>
		<dc:creator>boo_radley</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Facebook to blue screen shortly</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65862/Facebook%2Dto%2Dblue%2Dscreen%2Dshortly</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7061042.stm"&gt;Microsoft buys stake in Facebook.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/news?q=microsoft&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;hs=oz1&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=news_result&amp;resnum=4&amp;ct=title&quot;&gt;Microsoft &lt;/a&gt; has paid $240m (&amp;#0163;117m) for a 1.6% stake in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/home.php?&quot;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; that values the hugely popular social networking site at $15bn (&amp;#0163;7.3bn).  Facebook spurned an offer from Microsoft&apos;s rival &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/10/25/google-msft-facebook-tech-internet-cx_wt_1025techgoogle.html&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;, which was also keen to invest the site.

Microsoft will also sell &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3707121&quot;&gt;internet ads&lt;/a&gt; for Facebook outside the United States as part of the deal that took several weeks of negotiating.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/115/open_features-hacker-dropout-ceo.html&quot;&gt;Mark Zuckerberg&lt;/a&gt; started the online social networking site in his Harvard University dorm room less than four years ago. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/s.php?k=100000080&amp;id=4&quot;&gt;Mr Zuckerberg&lt;/a&gt;, 23, has indicated he would like to hold off on an initial public offering for at least two more years.  He rebuffed a $1bn takeover offer from Yahoo last year.  Facebook expects to make a profit of $30m this year so on conventional valuations a $15bn price tag would look expensive. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65862</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:51:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>facebook</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Gnosis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Open Content Alliance Digitizes Library Collections</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65765/Open%2DContent%2DAlliance%2DDigitizes%2DLibrary%2DCollections</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.opencontentalliance.org/"&gt;The Open Content Alliance&lt;/a&gt; poses a threat to Google and Microsoft&apos;s competing library digitization projects.  OCA was founded by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archive.org&quot;&gt;Internet Archive&lt;/a&gt;, whose main claim to fame is the Wayback Machine, designed to archive the internet&apos;s web history.  OCA&apos;s mission is to open the nation&apos;s library collections to universal web search by digitizing books and making them as widely accessible as possible. A number of major library systems, including the Boston Public Library and Smithsonian, have refused to sign up with competing ventures by Microsoft and Google because they do not provide for universal access to digitized books.  These commercial ventures prohibit books being accessed by competing search engines.

So far, 80 libraries and research institutions have signed on with Open Content Alliance.  They must pay for the scanning of their books while Google and Microsoft offset that cost for their participating institutions.

See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/22/technology/22library.html?hp&quot;&gt;Libraries Shun Deals to Place Books on Web&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65765</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:05:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>digitization</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internetarchive</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opencontentalliance</category>
		<category>scan</category>
		<category>waybackmachine</category>
		<dc:creator>richards1052</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What the Alliance looks like from the Empire</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62423/What%2Dthe%2DAlliance%2Dlooks%2Dlike%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2DEmpire</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://no2google.wordpress.com/2007/06/24/life-at-google-the-microsoftie-perspective/"&gt;Life at Google - The Microsoftie Perspective&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft Employee writes: &quot;The following has been making the rounds on just about every internal email list I belong to in Microsoft. Here it is to share a little insight with the rest of the world. Microsoft is an amazingly transparent company. Google is not. Any peek is a good peek.&quot;  Let the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ditii.com/blog/2007/06/26/%e2%80%9cgoogle-is-a-bummer-of-a-place-to-work-at%e2%80%9d-says-internal-microsoft-email/&quot;&gt;metavalanche&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gadzooki.com/tech-companies/google/google-showing-signs-of-growing-pains/&quot;&gt;begin&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62423</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:45:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computerindustry</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>management</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>NavelGazing2.0</category>
		<dc:creator>psmealey</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Justice Department Redux</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61960/Justice%2DDepartment%2DRedux</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/techwatch/archives/012366.html&quot; title=&quot;NYT: Google seeks antitrust action against Microsoft&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;v&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12771/1023/&quot; title=&quot;US Justice Department could suffer Microsoft &apos;memogate&apos;&quot;&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/10/business/10microsoft.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=2&amp;hp&quot; title=&quot;Microsoft Finds Legal Defender in Justice Dept.&quot;&gt;Fight&lt;/a&gt;!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61960</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:41:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Fight</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>Justice</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>taosbat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>To serve man (and woman)...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60620/To%2Dserve%2Dman%2Dand%2Dwoman</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=AZU4AQO0TKPNAQSNDLSCKHA?articleID=199201519&quot;&gt;Invasion&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.terk.ri.cmu.edu/&quot;&gt;TeRK&lt;/a&gt;s!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60620</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:02:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>carnegiemellon</category>
		<category>cmu</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>intel</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>robotics</category>
		<category>terk</category>
		<dc:creator>ZenMasterThis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The don&apos;t be Evil Empire?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57256/The%2Ddont%2Dbe%2DEvil%2DEmpire</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-12-20-n34.html&quot;&gt;people&lt;/a&gt; aren&apos;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.megginson.com/blogs/quoderat/2006/12/18/beginning-of-the-end-for-open-web-data-apis/&quot;&gt;happy about Google canceling it&apos;s API&lt;/a&gt; and replacing it with an &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxsearch/&quot;&gt;AJAX search widget&lt;/a&gt; you&apos;re supposed to put on your page (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://pluralsight.com/blogs/dbox/archive/2006/12/20/45379.aspx&quot;&gt;one that&apos;s deliberately obfuscated and difficult to extract data from&lt;/a&gt;). Google&apos;s &lt;a href=http://www.lehigh.edu/~jl0d/J198-06/Cover%20Story%20In%20Search%20Of%20The%20Real%20Google.htm&quot; &quot;&gt;obsession with secrecy&lt;/a&gt; isn&apos;t going unnoticed, and some employees are starting to feel like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/googlife&quot;&gt;the magic is gone and they&apos;re being treated like children&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt; Oh, and just to keep things in perspective &lt;a href=&quot;http://mashable.com/2006/12/21/microsoft-tries-to-patent-rss-readers/&quot;&gt;Microsoft just filed a patent on RSS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;

&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.57256</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 19:44:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>delmoi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A9 goes &apos;soft</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51606/A9%2Dgoes%2Dsoft</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.a9.com/"&gt;A9 gets MS?&lt;/a&gt; Amazon&apos;s search tool / portal, formerly powered by Google, is now using Microsoft&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.live.com/&quot;&gt;Windows Live&lt;/a&gt; search service. I first noticed when my image results went missing (which sucks, but I still use it for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fxs%2Fsharethepi.html&amp;ei=03hnRO7pGLH2aKmY9coJ&amp;sig2=hqD1Ahy2SXbeV8OejCyNqg&quot;&gt;incentive program&lt;/a&gt;). Does this mean MS is shifting out of the half-assery phase of its search strategy? What happens when its &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/adcenter/&quot;&gt;adCenter&lt;/a&gt; keyword program opens up? [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3355&quot;&gt;commentary&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51606</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 11:42:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>a9</category>
		<category>amazon</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>windowslive</category>
		<dc:creator>grobstein</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Privacy and the need or right to know</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48432/Privacy%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dneed%2Dor%2Dright%2Dto%2Dknow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB24/index.htm"&gt;NSA,FISA, and Privacy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;It is of course the president who finally approves of actions that may or may not be deemed legal but before 9/11, this is what he had been advised to consider&lt;/i&gt; &quot;The largest U.S. spy agency warned the incoming Bush administration in its &quot;Transition 2001&quot; report that the Information Age required rethinking the policies and authorities that kept the National Security Agency in compliance with the Constitution&apos;s 4th Amendment prohibition on &quot;unreasonable searches and seizures&quot; without warrant and &quot;probable cause,&quot; according to an updated briefing book of declassified NSA documents posted today on the World Wide Web.
If this is the sort of reading you enjoy, then by all means dig about here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB23/index.html&quot;&gt;
But then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5263/1.html&quot;&gt;Windows&lt;/a&gt; allowed NSA to have a sure access to your machine .
And by now we all know that &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2006/01/20/database_of_good_intentions.html&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; will fight the government on making its search data base available in order to protect your privacy.(Reality: to protect Google stuff). And if you worry about search engines tracking you and making data available, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70051-0.html?tw=wn_tophead_2&quot;&gt;then here is a workaround&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48432</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:31:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>FISA</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>NSA</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>IE goes boom!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47144/IE%2Dgoes%2Dboom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://explorerdestroyer.com/"&gt;Google pays $1 for every IE user converted to Firefox&lt;/a&gt; - but why? Google don&apos;t own Firefox, so is this only to piss off Microsoft?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47144</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:40:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>firefox</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>ie</category>
		<category>internetexplorer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<dc:creator>Orange Goblin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Microsoft did what now?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46342/Microsoft%2Ddid%2Dwhat%2Dnow</link>
		<description> It&apos;s long been known that if you type &quot;failure&quot; into Google and hit &quot;I&apos;m feeling lucky&quot;, you get &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html&quot;&gt;this page.&lt;/a&gt; Haha. Funny. The phenomenon is explained &lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/googlebombing-failure.html&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;

Now, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.live.com&quot;&gt;Microsoft&apos;s live.com&lt;/a&gt; went public recently. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html&quot;&gt;Guess what page it returns as the number 1 result for &quot;failure&quot;?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46342</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:09:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>failure</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>googlebomb</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<dc:creator>jon_kill</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>#1-Google, #2-Apple, #3-Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43781/1Google%2D2Apple%2D3Microsoft</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Research/?p=235&amp;amp;part=rss&amp;amp;tag=feed&amp;amp;subj=zdblog"&gt;&quot;A look at the average number of page views per title reveals that Microsoft gets about half as many page views per title as compared to Google and Apple&quot;&lt;/a&gt; a strong indication of where reader interest &lt;b&gt;actually&lt;/b&gt; resides.&quot; - ZDNet. Intelliseek&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogpulse.com/&quot;&gt;Blogpulse&lt;/a&gt; reveals similar numbers: #1 Google: 473K, #2 Apple: 381K, #3 Microsoft: 262K. Venture capitalist, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beyondvc.com/2005/07/net_and_vc_loya.html&quot;&gt;Ed Sim, says&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;While the OS is important, &lt;b&gt;Microsoft has lost its complete and utter dominance&lt;/b&gt; as we move to a service-oriented world where broadband is everywhere, apps are in the cloud, and the browser becomes king.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43781</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:32:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>data</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>pageviews</category>
		<category>stats</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Keeping the doctor away, Redmond style</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43734/Keeping%2Dthe%2Ddoctor%2Daway%2DRedmond%2Dstyle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://virtualearth.msn.com/default.aspx?cp=37.331822|-122.031179&amp;amp;style=h&amp;amp;lvl=17&amp;amp;v=1"&gt;Microsoft wipes Apple from the face of the Earth.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;Virtual&lt;/em&gt; Earth, that is. A search for &quot;1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA&quot; renders only an empty field and some sort of barn. This is &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?q=1+infinite+loop,+cupertino,+ca&amp;spn=0.004263,0.007522&amp;t=k&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;what it really looks like&lt;/a&gt;.  Finding that other microcomputer company is &lt;a href=&quot;http://virtualearth.msn.com/default.aspx?ss=1%20Microsoft%20Way|microsoft&amp;cp=47.641778|-122.129915&amp;style=h&amp;lvl=16&amp;sp=adr.1%20Microsoft%20Way%2C%20Redmond%2C%20WA%2098052&amp;v=1&quot;&gt;obviously&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?q=1+Microsoft+Way,+redmond,+wa&amp;ll=47.643938,-122.130740&amp;spn=0.007224,0.015044&amp;t=k&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;not a problem&lt;/a&gt;.

Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/business/energy/feeds/ap/2005/07/25/ap2156060.html&quot;&gt;blames old photographs&lt;/a&gt; (from 1991) for the omission, but copyright notices on the images go only as far back as last year.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43734</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:13:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aerialphotography</category>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>googlemaps</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>satelliteimagery</category>
		<category>virtualearth</category>
		<dc:creator>goodnewsfortheinsane</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The future of MS, Apple, and Google</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41984/The%2Dfuture%2Dof%2DMS%2DApple%2Dand%2DGoogle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20050512.html"&gt;The future of Google, Apple, and Microsoft.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41984</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 19:13:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>ms</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>Tlogmer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Google News gets some competition from Microsoft.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34689/Google%2DNews%2Dgets%2Dsome%2Dcompetition%2Dfrom%2DMicrosoft</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://newsbot.msnbc.msn.com/"&gt;Google News gets some competition from Microsoft.&lt;/a&gt; MSNBC unveils its &apos;newsbot.&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34689</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2004 08:50:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Google to Search Your PC For You</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33180/Google%2Dto%2DSearch%2DYour%2DPC%2DFor%2DYou</link>
		<description> The John Markoff of the New York Times &lt;small&gt;[registration required]&lt;/small&gt; reports that Google plans to roll-out a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/19/technology/19google.html?hp&quot;&gt;text and file search tool code-named Puffin&lt;/a&gt; for finding information stored on PCs. The move is seen as a defensive one; Microsoft plans to include PC searching in its new operating system, scheduled to be released in 2006 (at the earliest).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33180</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 08:40:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>PC</category>
		<category>Puffin</category>
		<category>searching</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Battle of the Newsbots</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29672/Battle%2Dof%2Dthe%2DNewsbots</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://newsbot.msn.com/"&gt;Microsoft fires back at Google News.&lt;/a&gt; As described in &lt;a  _top href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994398&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; in New Scientist, MSN is trying its own version of Google News with a twist: theirs adds &lt;i&gt;customized&lt;/i&gt; content tailored to the interests of the current reader.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29672</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:04:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>newsbots</category>
		<category>personalization</category>
		<dc:creator>costas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Biz Stratergy MS uses</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27141/Biz%2DStratergy%2DMS%2Duses</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2085668/"&gt;Google: the God that failed?&lt;/a&gt; is the title of the article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/&quot;&gt;MSN Slate&lt;/a&gt;. All of us know Microsoft is working on a new search engine technology. Till date everyone considers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; to be &lt;em&gt;the Guru&lt;/em&gt;. MS obviously doesn&apos;t like that, so what it is doing? Well, the same thing it always does - to survive competition, eliminate it.
The reasons being given by the article are pretty silly and more aimed at &apos;faming down&apos; Google.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27141</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:17:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>engine</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>jayantk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>MSN + Linux = Funny</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26724/MSN%2DLinux%2DFunny</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://search.msn.com/results.asp?RS=CHECKED&amp;amp;FORM=MSNH&amp;amp;v=1&amp;amp;q=linux"&gt;Searching MSN for the phrase &quot;Linux&quot;&lt;/a&gt; yields some pretty amusing (but yes, unsurprising) results.  The first site seems moderately legit - Amazon stuff related to linux.  The second one - MSN has a tech section about Linux?  Not exactly.  It doesn&apos;t really have much linux content at first glance.  The third link is most amusing - see for yourself.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Comparatively, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;q=linux&quot;&gt;google search for &quot;linux&quot;&lt;/a&gt; yields much more useful results.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
This makes me wonder:  should ethics be taken into consideration on search engines?  MS has every right to have whatever they want come up when you type in &quot;linux&quot; - but they are willfully contaminating search results, which makes one wonder what &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=word+processor&amp;FORM=SMCRT&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=browser&amp;FORM=SMCRT&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=instant+messaging&amp;FORM=SMCRT&quot;&gt;terms&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft might want to rig the output of, and also, which they might have &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=freebsd&amp;FORM=SMCRT&quot;&gt;overlooked&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26724</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:39:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<dc:creator>twiggy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19383/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;https://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&amp;id=50956&quot; title=&quot;and then Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Illinois, Wisconsin, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Indiana, Ohio, Iowa, Arizona, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, Minnesota, West Virginia and Maryland&quot;&gt;It starts with Delaware...  &lt;/a&gt; Over at Google Answers, a Microsoft Games Studio employee has posted a most interesting puzzle to solve.  Over the course of the last twenty &lt;i&gt;months&lt;/i&gt; a list of states has been gradually revealed by his boss, but under what criteria are they listed? He&apos;s giving $200.00 to the winner; just think of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/1889&quot; title=&quot;The original Metafilter $30 giveaway&quot;&gt;what &lt;/a&gt;you could &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/7756&quot; title=&quot;The $50 sequel&quot;&gt;buy&lt;/a&gt;.  The fine folks at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?&amp;threadid=130383&quot; title=&quot;Help us mighty Cecil&quot;&gt;Straight Dope &lt;/a&gt;are already on the case.  To the Googlemobile!  [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cardhouse.com&quot; title=&quot;The Cardhouse Mystery Confusion Hill Spot Vortex House of Wonder&quot;&gt;Cardhouse&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19383</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 09:26:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>contests</category>
		<category>delaware</category>
		<category>games</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>googleanswers</category>
		<category>hoaxes</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>puzzles</category>
		<dc:creator>thewittyname</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15836/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.longbets.com/"&gt;Long Bets.&lt;/a&gt; SCOTTSDALE, Ariz.--In 28 years, commercial airline passengers will routinely fly in pilotless airplanes. Sound ludicrous?

Not to Microsoft Chief Technology Officer Craig Mundie, who recently bet Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt $2,000 that the prediction will come true.

This site is all about, well long bets. Oh, and it&apos;s all for charity.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15836</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:18:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bets</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>predictions</category>
		<category>wagers</category>
		<dc:creator>Zool</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


