3 posts tagged with microsoft by ed.
Displaying 1 through 3 of 3.

Related tags:
+ (90)
+ (89)
+ (57)
+ (45)
+ (44)
+ (42)
+ (36)
+ (33)
+ (33)
+ (32)
+ (32)
+ (30)
+ (25)
+ (24)
+ (21)
+ (20)
+ (18)
+ (17)
+ (16)
+ (15)
+ (15)
+ (14)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (13)
+ (12)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)


Users that often use this tag:
mathowie (31)
Artw (13)
Blazecock Pileon (11)
Steven Den Beste (10)
baylink (7)
grant (5)
owillis (5)
solistrato (5)
quonsar (5)
Tlogmer (4)
riffola (4)
cCranium (4)
endquote (4)
bobbyelliott (4)
jjg (3)
Dean_Paxton (3)
tranquileye (3)
ericost (3)
tregoweth (3)
aurelian (3)
costas (3)
Brilliantcrank (3)
milnak (3)
skallas (3)
Outlawyr (3)
ed (3)
jonson (3)
digaman (3)
zarq (3)
2bucksplus (3)
weston (2)
troutfishing (2)
sourbrew (2)
armoured-ant (2)
nthdegx (2)
Mwongozi (2)
Mack Twain (2)
aaronshaf (2)
gazingus (2)
Duug (2)
jeremias (2)
grabbingsand (2)
SandeepKrishnamurthy (2)
kirkaracha (2)
plemeljr (2)
delmoi (2)
Rastafari (2)
dchase (2)
badstone (2)
machaus (2)
mecawilson (2)
Postroad (2)
headlemur (2)
jragon (2)
Hackworth (2)
tatochip (2)
jhiggy (2)
Zool (2)
bkdelong (2)
rcade (2)
Another way around sneaky agreements: A Californian is suing (PDF) Microsoft and Symantec over shrink-wrapped agreements and EULAs that are only readable when you first install the software, making a return or refund absolutely impossible. Many courts have upheld shrinkwrap licenses. Conversely, reverse engineering has been determined to constitute fair use. If this case sets a precedent, could we see abridged legalese on the side of future boxes or a rethinking of software licensing trends? Or will the cluttered tower of consumer rights, protection for software companies and code evolution and innovation topple over?
posted by ed on Feb 10, 2003 - 21 comments

Microsoft unleashes Palladium, an intrusive doozy of a feature involving specially secure AMD/Intel computer chips and cryptology provided by Microsoft. Newsweek's head-bobbing Steven Levy, the first to get the story, remains taciturn, failing to call into question Microsoft's security sins of the past. Geeks run scared while digital rights and GPL concerns are wholly ignored by the mainstream media. Is this yet another example of a malcontent media that will never possess the balls to actually question a new feature put out by Microsoft? Even Wired can't seem to read between the lines of a technology that "stemmed from early work by engineers to deliver digital movies that couldn't be pirated."
posted by ed on Jun 25, 2002 - 16 comments

Win XP's Product Activation as a breeze to hack. Provided that RC1 still ships as is and you keep your RAM locked at a fixed number of sticks, it's simply a matter of keeping a backup of a DBL file. For all the ballyhoo, it's amazing that something this obvious slipped under the cracks. With WPA this sloppy, is this the only half-hearted facet of Windows XP?
posted by ed on Jul 17, 2001 - 36 comments

Page: 1