<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with middleast and mideast</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/middleast+mideast</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'middleast' and 'mideast' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:43:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:43:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Iraq Lacked Atom Whack</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29205/Iraq%2DLacked%2DAtom%2DWhack</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;At least four times in the fall of 2002, the president and his advisers invoked the specter of a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/07/bush.transcript/&quot; title=&quot;Bush: Don&apos;t wait for mushroom cloud&quot;&gt;mushroom cloud&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; and some of them, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, described &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer&quot; title=&quot;According to records made available to The Washington Post and interviews with arms investigators from the United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration&apos;s prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either.&quot;&gt;Iraq&apos;s nuclear ambitions as a threat to the American homeland&lt;/a&gt;... Among the closely held internal judgments of the Iraq Survey Group, overseen by David Kay as special representative of CIA Director George J. Tenet, are that Iraq&apos;s nuclear weapons scientists did no significant arms-related work after 1991, that facilities with suspicious new construction proved benign, and that equipment of potential use to a nuclear program remained under seal or in civilian industrial use. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;So in regards to Iraq&apos;s possession of &lt;em&gt;the one weapon we can be certain causes mass destruction: the atomic bomb&lt;/em&gt;, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.why-war.com/news/2002/10/07/weaponso.html&quot; title=&quot;Aum Shinrikyo employed skilled scientists and spent freely to make&apos;&apos;high grade&apos;&apos; anthrax, which it spread around Tokyo on several occasions. The cult gave up on anthrax after it failed to infect even a single person.&quot;&gt;Gregg&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newagepointofinfinity.com/homeland_security.htm&quot; title=&quot;The British and Germans used one ton of chemical weapons per fatality caused during World War I. The 1995 release of the nerve gas sarin in the Tokyo subways by the Aum Shinrikyo sect killed 12 people, fewer than a small, standard bomb might have killed in that crowded, enclosed area. An estimated 5,000 Kurds died in Saddam Hussein&apos;s chemical attack on Halabja, Iraq, in 1988, but this involved dozens of fighter-bombers making repeated low passes over the town. It&apos;s hard to imagine that terrorists could pull off such a coordinated heavy military maneuver. The image of millions cowering behind plastic sheets as clouds of biological weapons envelop a city owes more to science fiction than reality. The Japanese use of fleas infected with bubonic plague against Chinese cities in World War II was the only successful instance of bioattacks in contemporary warfare. In 1971, &apos;&apos;weaponized&apos;&apos; smallpox was accidentally released from a Soviet plant; three people died. In 1979, an explosion at another Soviet site released a large quantity of weapons-grade anthrax; 68 people died.In 1989, workers at an American government laboratory near Washington were accidentally exposed to Ebola, and it was several days before the mistake was discovered; no one died. A coordinated anthrax attack in the fall of 2001 killed five people, a tiny fraction of the number who died of influenza during the time the nation was terrified by the anthrax letters.&quot;&gt;Easterbrook&lt;/a&gt; put it, the verdict is the unsurprising (and unsurprisingly &lt;em&gt;closely held&lt;/em&gt;) nope, not, zero, zip, nada...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29205</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DavidKay</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Easterbrook</category>
		<category>GeorgeTenet</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>IraqSurveyGroup</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>mushrooms</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Tenet</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18721/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4054-2002Jul26.html"&gt;Gore questions timing of Iraq concern&lt;/a&gt; Is it proper to invade Iraq?  This would be an unprecedented move for the US military as Iraq has not attacked the US anyone the US has defense treaties with. 
&quot;Republican National Committee spokesman Jim Dyke called Gore&apos;s comments &quot;irresponsible.&quot;
&quot;This is no time to attack the president or Republicans for their handling of the war for political gain,&quot; he said.&quot;

Hmmm..so he admits the Iraqi attack IS for partisan political gain, eh?  I would have never suspected it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18721</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>invasion</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>occupation</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>RNC</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16782/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/04/28/MN222422.DTL"&gt;Hamas accepts Saudi peace plan:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;There has been generation after generation (of war). Now there is a generation who needs to live in peace, and not worry about their safety,&quot; said [Hamas executive Ismail Abu] Shanab. &quot;So it is a generation that wants to practice living in peace and postpone historical issues. We speak of historical Palestine, and practical reality.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Since their official position is that &quot;Leaving the circle of conflict with Israel is a major act of treason&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cdn-friends-icej.ca/isreport/hamas.html&quot;&gt;Hamas Charter&lt;/a&gt;, Article 32), this is a dramatic change in policy indeed.  I&apos;m gobsmacked; this is utterly unbelievable, yet apparently real.  And genuinely hopeful IMHO.  What do you think?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16782</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:16:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hamas</category>
		<category>intifada</category>
		<category>israel</category>
		<category>jordan</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>palestine</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>saudi</category>
		<category>saudiarabia</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>boaz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10058/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.moqawama.org/page2/main.htm&quot; target=self&gt;Caution: This links might be inflamatory&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
A friend runs a site that is a portal dealing with middle-eastern news (for his safety, I will not link to it). He often receives hate-filled emails urging him to act out against various ethnic groups. This link was sent to him a couple of months ago; it is Islamic Resistance Support Association and is loaded with anti-american propaganda. [view at your own risk]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10058</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:28:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>IRSA</category>
		<category>islam</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>terrorists</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>WTC</category>
		<dc:creator>hotdoughnutsnow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2560/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/07/21/charlotte.raids.02/index.html"&gt;Hizbollah supporters arrested for Cigarette smuggling.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The men may have netted up to $10,000, and according to an &quot;confidential Canadian source&quot; were under orders to buy night vision goggles for Hizbollah, which is considered a terrorist group by Israel and the United States. Their leader is said by another(?) source as being &quot;very comfortable around weapons.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; I don&apos;t think it&apos;s a coincidence that this story is coming to our attention during the peace talks at Camp David. There&apos;s nothing in any article I have read on this story giving any substantial proof that these people and their arrest were really front-page events.  Does anyone else feel that reportage of the Middle East, and indeed US policy, is clouded and indeed skewed, perhaps in much the same way as the States&apos; Cuba policy?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2560</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:30:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cigarettes</category>
		<category>hezbollah</category>
		<category>hizbollah</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>smuggling</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>chaz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


