<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with mideast and bush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/mideast+bush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'mideast' and 'bush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:18:29 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:18:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Sleeping with the president is not a good idea.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35699/Sleeping%2Dwith%2Dthe%2Dpresident%2Dis%2Dnot%2Da%2Dgood%2Didea</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20040919_81.html"&gt;Sleeping with the president is not a good idea.&lt;/a&gt; Bush had no answers to big questions, such as &apos;what happens on the morning after.&apos; The Daily Telegraph reports that documents show Prime Minister Tony Blair signed up to the U.S. policy of regime change in March 2002, a year before the conflict started... after he was warned that postwar stability would be difficult and the U.S. had few answers. Oh, no problem. This week, &lt;a _top href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/18/bush.iraq/index.html&quot;&gt;Bush said he is &apos;pleased with the progress&apos; in Iraq.&apos;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35699</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:18:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanHistory</category>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>lapdogs</category>
		<category>MiddleEast</category>
		<category>Mideast</category>
		<category>PresidentBush</category>
		<category>TonyBlair</category>
		<category>USHistory</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>fleener</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20530/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v24/n19/print/liev01_.html"&gt;The Push For War (by Anatol Lieven).&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The most surprising thing about the Bush Administration&apos;s plan to invade Iraq is not that it is destructive of international order; or wicked, when we consider the role the US (and Britain) have played, and continue to play, in the Middle East; or opposed by the great majority of the international community; or seemingly contrary to some of the basic needs of the war against terrorism. It is all of these things, but they are of no great concern to the hardline nationalists in the Administration....The most surprising thing about the push for war is that it is so profoundly reckless....What we see now is the tragedy of a great country, with noble impulses, successful institutions, magnificent historical achievements and immense energies, which has become a menace to itself and to mankind.&quot; 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Excecutive summary:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yale.edu/yup/books/079567.htm&quot;&gt;Lord Acton&lt;/a&gt; foretold all fruit of &quot;military superiority&quot;. &lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20530</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 01:38:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>Anatol</category>
		<category>AnatolLieven</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>Lieven</category>
		<category>LRB</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>UKpolitics</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>fold_and_mutilate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18030/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37357-2002Jun24.html"&gt;Bush&apos;s speech today&lt;/a&gt;  revealed the basis of what the current administration believes is the roadmap to peace in the Mideast.  After looking at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37568-2002Jun24.html&quot;&gt;the major points&lt;/a&gt; of the plan, I feel it&apos;s about as good of a deal as the Palestinians are ever going to get and pretty much the only way out for the Israeli&apos;s also.  What do you think?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18030</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:00:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>israel</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>palestine</category>
		<category>peace</category>
		<dc:creator>RevGreg</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10316/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2001/09/14/sharon/index.html"&gt;Bush, Powell pushing Peres into Peace Talks&lt;/a&gt; &#8220;Bush urged the prime minister to make progress with the Palestinians on ending the violence in the Mideast, White House spokesman Sean McCormack said.&#8221; war : diplomacy :: problem : solution  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10316</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:13:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>diplomacy</category>
		<category>mccormack</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>palestinians</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>powell</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<dc:creator>raaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


