<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with missiles and weapons</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/missiles+weapons</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'missiles' and 'weapons' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:59:26 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:59:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Trademarked Nukes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38790/Trademarked%2DNukes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/factfile/missiles/wep-toma.html"&gt;Tomahawk&amp;#0174; Brand Cruise Missiles&lt;/a&gt; Because not all Block II Nuclear Variant cruise missles are alike...  Look for the name you can trust!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38790</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:59:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>NuclearWeapons</category>
		<category>nukes</category>
		<category>Tomahawk</category>
		<category>trademark</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>jimjam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gamma-ray weapons could trigger next arms race</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27651/Gammaray%2Dweapons%2Dcould%2Dtrigger%2Dnext%2Darms%2Drace</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994049"&gt;Gamma-ray weapons could trigger next arms race&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The hafnium explosive could be extremely powerful. One gram of fully charged hafnium isomer could store more energy than 50 kilograms of TNT. Miniature missiles could be made with warheads that are far more powerful than existing conventional weapons, giving massively enhanced firepower to the armed forces using them.&quot;

Half of me thinks: &quot;WOW! Cool!&quot;
The other 1% thinks: &quot;We&apos;ve really had it now&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27651</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2003 02:32:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arms</category>
		<category>gammaray</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>hmgovt</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Patriot Missiles shooting down our side</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24867/Patriot%2DMissiles%2Dshooting%2Ddown%2Dour%2Dside</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/04/wjet04.xml&amp;amp;sSheet=/news/2003/04/04/ixnewstop.html"&gt;US fighter shot down by Patriot missile&lt;/a&gt; The Patriot Missiles that are supposed to be the protector of American forces are living up to their reputation. So far, one just  shot down an F-18, and previously took out a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;$sessionid$BUA0PUBD5CBGXQFIQMGCFF4AVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2003/03/24/wraf24.xml&quot;&gt;RAF Tornado&lt;/a&gt;, killing two people. Another one locked onto an F-16, but the quick-thinking pilot blew up the Patriot missile battery&apos;s radar dish with a HARM missile. These &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2080615&quot;&gt;missiles didn&apos;t work&lt;/a&gt; in the last gulf war, and are continuing to follow that trend. The locking onto allied planes seems to indicate a bug in the IFF routines of the Patriots. Not very patriotic of it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24867</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 20:38:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABM</category>
		<category>aviation</category>
		<category>ballisticmissiles</category>
		<category>defence</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>fighters</category>
		<category>friendlyfire</category>
		<category>materiel</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>patriotmissiles</category>
		<category>patriots</category>
		<category>warplanes</category>
		<category>weaponry</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>Xoc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9481/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1471000/1471306.stm"&gt;Sen. Biden may scotch missile defense.&lt;/a&gt; Didn&apos;t see any mention of this on the main American news sites I checked, as they celebrate Bush&apos;s recent policy triumphs in Congress and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/9461&quot;&gt;wink&lt;/a&gt; at his fleeing for his ranch for a month. Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/608959.asp&quot;&gt;stories about his future challenges&lt;/a&gt; don&apos;t refer to this, which seems important to me. You can bet the rest of the world is more interested in this story.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9481</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 12:29:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AMD</category>
		<category>Biden</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>JoeBiden</category>
		<category>missiledefence</category>
		<category>missiledefense</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>Senate</category>
		<category>SenatorBiden</category>
		<category>Senators</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>aflakete</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


