<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with mommytrack</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/mommytrack</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'mommytrack' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:34:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:34:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Choices, constraints, and the &apos;mommy track.&apos;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/67090/Choices%2Dconstraints%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dmommy%2Dtrack</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://scatter.wordpress.com/2007/12/01/choices-consequences-constraints/"&gt;Insightful, sociological, bitter:&lt;/a&gt; A scholar reflects back on her entry into the academic &apos;mommy track.&apos; An interesting blend of meditation-on-resentment and just-plain-resentment, worth a read both intentionally and un-. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://crookedtimber.org/2007/12/02/choice-and-social-structure&quot;&gt;via&lt;/a&gt;] As the poster (&lt;strong&gt;olderwoman&lt;/strong&gt;) points out in her first comment, the post nearly/neatly glosses over the fact that it&apos;s written from the perspective of a &lt;em&gt;tenured&lt;/em&gt; academic. Her post - not quite an &apos;essay,&apos; thanks - interests me for several reasons: it&apos;s emblematic of the limitations and bizarre literary blind spots of online confession/analysis by scholars; it doesn&apos;t flinch in describing the anger and (self-/hubby-)loathing baked into so many relationships, affluent and otherwise; it might be a deliciously reflexive demonstration of the nature of self-righteousness or a run-of-the-mill example of it, or something uneasily situated halfway between. I wouldn&apos;t actually call this &apos;best of the web&apos; in aesthetic, scholarly, or confessional terms, but something about its ironies appeals to me. The scholarly blogosphere isn&apos;t well represented on MeFi, so there you go.

Incidentally, if you have an eye for academic blogs in general, follow the &apos;via&apos; link to Crooked Timber, one of the best academic group blogs for several years running. A bit predictable in its politics sometimes, but then isn&apos;t everyone? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.67090</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academia</category>
		<category>blogpostasslomotrainwreck</category>
		<category>constraints</category>
		<category>feminism</category>
		<category>mommytrack</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>sociology</category>
		<dc:creator>waxbanks</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


