<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with moon and moonlanding</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/moon+moonlanding</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'moon' and 'moonlanding' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Happy 40th anniversary, mankind.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82966/Happy%2D40th%2Danniversary%2Dmankind</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/110442/WORLD-EXCLUSIVE-NASA-finds-missing-moon-landing-tapes"&gt;Moon Landing Tapes Found!&lt;/a&gt; All the videos you&apos;ve seen of the first moon landing are crap.  Remember, back in the day, video cameras and recorders were two different things.  So it went like this: camera on moon sends footage to Australia, where it&apos;s recorded on tape (and then those tapes were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/561/nasa-loses-moon-landing-tapes&quot;&gt;lost&lt;/a&gt;), then downsized onto a smaller monitor, which is filmed by another video camera, uploaded to satellite, and disseminated around the world.  America watches it on TV, cheers.  Some of this footage is filmed off of a television onto 16mm film. This is what goes into the national archives.  Crap.

So, the original tapes have been found (spoiler: they never left Australia). So what, right? How good could they be, recorded back in the late 60&apos;s and all? Pretty darn good, apparently...seems recording heads were much better than the output available at the time (like playing a Blu-Ray disc on a B&amp;amp;W TV), and several &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/80307/I-could-not-morally-get-rid-of-this-stuff&quot;&gt;recent&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/81321/Thats-no-Moon-Or-a-McDonalds-WTF&quot;&gt;projects&lt;/a&gt; have shown that it&apos;s possible to extract very high resolution data from these old analog tapes.  How hi-rez? &lt;a href=&quot;http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap081118.html&quot;&gt;High enough to see Neil Armstrong&apos;s nipples get hard.&lt;/a&gt; (be sure to click on that picture)

So when can we see this amazing footage? Probably &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1770718/nasa_prepares_to_celebrate_moon_landings.html?cat=15&quot;&gt;soon.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82966</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apollo</category>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>earth</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapes</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapesfound</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapeslost</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>NeilArmstrong</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>spacetravel</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>sexyrobot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>To the moon, Google</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64674/To%2Dthe%2Dmoon%2DGoogle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.space.com/news/070913_google_xprize.html"&gt;Google wants to send you to the moon.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64674</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:49:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>commercialspaceflight</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>spaceflight</category>
		<category>xprize</category>
		<dc:creator>Roman Graves</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Did NASA fake the moon landings?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35323/Did%2DNASA%2Dfake%2Dthe%2Dmoon%2Dlandings</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.brainsluice.com/miscellanea/misc/moonlanding.html"&gt;Did NASA fake the moon landings?&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m convinced!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35323</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:26:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fake</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<dc:creator>glenwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Apollo Lunar Surface Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24171/Apollo%2DLunar%2DSurface%2DJournal</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/frame.html"&gt;The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.&lt;/a&gt; Journals, records and some images from the Apollo lunar missions.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24171</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apollo</category>
		<category>ApolloLunarSurfaceJournal</category>
		<category>ApolloProgram</category>
		<category>astronauts</category>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>journals</category>
		<category>LunarSurface</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>plep</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21456/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2410431.stm"&gt;NASA Challenges Moon Hoax Conspiracy&lt;/a&gt; After decades of almost ignoring claims that the Apollo missions were hoaxed, NASA commissioned aerospace writer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jamesoberg.com/&quot;&gt;James Olberg&lt;/a&gt; to write an official rebuttle.  Perhaps a bit more reasonable than the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasastooge.fsnet.co.uk/&quot;&gt;NASA Stooge&lt;/a&gt;, the book is aimed at the general public.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21456</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:25:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apollo</category>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>ConspiracyTheory</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>JamesOberg</category>
		<category>Luna</category>
		<category>LunarLanding</category>
		<category>Moon</category>
		<category>MoonLanding</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>KirkJobSluder</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


