<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with msn and internet</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/msn+internet</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'msn' and 'internet' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:30:56 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:30:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>SBC Vonage Google Internet pay Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46292/SBC%2DVonage%2DGoogle%2DInternet%2Dpay%2DYahoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_45/b3958089.htm"&gt;&quot;They use my lines for free -- and that&apos;s bull.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; The CEO of SBC Communications Inc. Ed Whitacre launched this criticism at the likes of Vonage, Google,Yahoo and MSN. Meanwhile Google is &lt;a href=&quot;http://today.reuters.com/business/newsArticle.aspx?type=media&amp;storyID=nN13349148&quot;&gt;
seeking &lt;/a&gt; some &lt;a hef=&#8221;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,69271,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_5&quot; &quot;&gt;alternative&lt;/a&gt;
paths to&lt;a href=&quot;http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=171202569&quot;&gt;  the Internet.&lt;/a&gt;Perhaps SBC should head the old adage from John Gilmore &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/accidentalsuperhighway.htm&quot;&gt;&quot;the net treats censorship as a defect and routes around it&#8221;&lt;/a&gt;Or perhaps these companies need to pay the proverbial Internet plumbers; myself, I prefer more competition;&lt;a href=&quot;http://assets.wharton.upenn.edu/~faulhabe/732/InternetKilledPhone.html&quot;&gt;my  phone bill has never been lower! &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46292</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:30:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BPL</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>FTTH</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>SBC</category>
		<category>WIFI</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Search Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36935/Search%2DWars</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4003193.stm"&gt;Search Wars&lt;/a&gt; The BBC reviews five search engines, including Google and the new MSN beta  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36935</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:34:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>searchengines</category>
		<category>web</category>
		<category>websearches</category>
		<dc:creator>Mwongozi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Biz Stratergy MS uses</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27141/Biz%2DStratergy%2DMS%2Duses</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2085668/"&gt;Google: the God that failed?&lt;/a&gt; is the title of the article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/&quot;&gt;MSN Slate&lt;/a&gt;. All of us know Microsoft is working on a new search engine technology. Till date everyone considers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; to be &lt;em&gt;the Guru&lt;/em&gt;. MS obviously doesn&apos;t like that, so what it is doing? Well, the same thing it always does - to survive competition, eliminate it.
The reasons being given by the article are pretty silly and more aimed at &apos;faming down&apos; Google.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27141</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:17:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>competition</category>
		<category>engine</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>slate</category>
		<dc:creator>jayantk</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/3553/</link>
		<description> I don&apos;t recall having heard from anybody that &lt;a href=&quot;http://radioshack.qsigroup.com/pr/msn.html&quot;&gt;the consumer experience of getting online&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;required&lt;/i&gt; redefinition.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.3553</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2000 07:27:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>MSN</category>
		<category>Radioshack</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>baylink</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/504/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://computingcentral.msn.com/topics/bandwidth/speedtest50.asp"&gt;The bandwidth speed test over at MSN&lt;/a&gt; seems to be the most accurate one I&apos;ve used so far. It gave out statistics that are very close to what I expected, and didn&apos;t choke just because I&apos;m on a T3. (thanks &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.sonoma.edu/people/dinkins/blogger.html&apos;&gt;blogblog&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.504</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:42:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bandwidth</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>msn</category>
		<category>speedometer</category>
		<category>throughput</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


