<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nasa and moonlanding</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nasa+moonlanding</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nasa' and 'moonlanding' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Happy 40th anniversary, mankind.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82966/Happy%2D40th%2Danniversary%2Dmankind</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/110442/WORLD-EXCLUSIVE-NASA-finds-missing-moon-landing-tapes"&gt;Moon Landing Tapes Found!&lt;/a&gt; All the videos you&apos;ve seen of the first moon landing are crap.  Remember, back in the day, video cameras and recorders were two different things.  So it went like this: camera on moon sends footage to Australia, where it&apos;s recorded on tape (and then those tapes were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/561/nasa-loses-moon-landing-tapes&quot;&gt;lost&lt;/a&gt;), then downsized onto a smaller monitor, which is filmed by another video camera, uploaded to satellite, and disseminated around the world.  America watches it on TV, cheers.  Some of this footage is filmed off of a television onto 16mm film. This is what goes into the national archives.  Crap.

So, the original tapes have been found (spoiler: they never left Australia). So what, right? How good could they be, recorded back in the late 60&apos;s and all? Pretty darn good, apparently...seems recording heads were much better than the output available at the time (like playing a Blu-Ray disc on a B&amp;amp;W TV), and several &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/80307/I-could-not-morally-get-rid-of-this-stuff&quot;&gt;recent&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/81321/Thats-no-Moon-Or-a-McDonalds-WTF&quot;&gt;projects&lt;/a&gt; have shown that it&apos;s possible to extract very high resolution data from these old analog tapes.  How hi-rez? &lt;a href=&quot;http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap081118.html&quot;&gt;High enough to see Neil Armstrong&apos;s nipples get hard.&lt;/a&gt; (be sure to click on that picture)

So when can we see this amazing footage? Probably &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1770718/nasa_prepares_to_celebrate_moon_landings.html?cat=15&quot;&gt;soon.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82966</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:01:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apollo</category>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>earth</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapes</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapesfound</category>
		<category>moonlandingtapeslost</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>NeilArmstrong</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>satellite</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>spacetravel</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>sexyrobot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Why does Rice play Texas?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53162/Why%2Ddoes%2DRice%2Dplay%2DTexas</link>
		<description> &lt;i&gt;&#8220;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maniacworld.com/Apollo_11.htm&quot;&gt;That&apos;s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.&lt;/a&gt;&#8221;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;[Audio]&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2635000/2635845.stm&quot;&gt;On 21 July 1969&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/history/apollo/apollo-11/apollo-11.htm&quot;&gt;four days after taking&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://history.nasa.gov/ap11-35ann/goodwill/Apollo_11_material.pdf&quot;&gt;off from Cape Canaveral&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://history.nasa.gov/ap11-35ann/FirstLunarLanding/cover.html&quot;&gt;and six and a half hours after&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.astronautix.com/flights/apollo11.htm&quot;&gt;landing Apollo 11 on the Sea of Tranquility&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/a11.crew.html&quot;&gt;Neil Armstrong&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://history.nasa.gov/ap11-35ann/pressconf.htm&quot;&gt;became the &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/lunartimeline.html&quot;&gt;first human&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://history.nasa.gov/ap11-35ann/interviewspdf/congrec.pdf&quot;&gt;to step foot on the moon.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/apollo11/index.html&quot;&gt;Without a doubt&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/history/apollo/apollo11/&quot;&gt;the moon landing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/apollo11/&quot;&gt;is one of the&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panoramas.dk/fullscreen3/f29.html&quot;&gt;greatest accomplishments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasm.si.edu/exhibitions/gal100/apollo11.html&quot;&gt;of mankind.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_37_5437.gif&quot;&gt;For those who were&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_37_5445.gif&quot;&gt;alive thirty-seven&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_37_5458.gif&quot;&gt;years ago,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_40_5875.gif&quot;&gt;the sight&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_37_5545.gif&quot;&gt;of Armstrong&#8217;s&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_40_5878.gif&quot;&gt;&#8220;small step&#8221;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_40_5863.gif&quot;&gt;is one of the&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_40_5868.gif&quot;&gt;most iconic&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_40_5880.gif&quot;&gt;images of&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/a11_h_40_5886.gif&quot;&gt;their lifetime.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53162</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:15:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Aldrin</category>
		<category>Apollo11</category>
		<category>Armstrong</category>
		<category>Collins</category>
		<category>MoonLanding</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<dc:creator>NotMyselfRightNow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Did NASA fake the moon landings?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35323/Did%2DNASA%2Dfake%2Dthe%2Dmoon%2Dlandings</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.brainsluice.com/miscellanea/misc/moonlanding.html"&gt;Did NASA fake the moon landings?&lt;/a&gt; I&apos;m convinced!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35323</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:26:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fake</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<dc:creator>glenwood</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Apollo Lunar Surface Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24171/Apollo%2DLunar%2DSurface%2DJournal</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/frame.html"&gt;The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal.&lt;/a&gt; Journals, records and some images from the Apollo lunar missions.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24171</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apollo</category>
		<category>ApolloLunarSurfaceJournal</category>
		<category>ApolloProgram</category>
		<category>astronauts</category>
		<category>astronomy</category>
		<category>journals</category>
		<category>LunarSurface</category>
		<category>moon</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>plep</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21456/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2410431.stm"&gt;NASA Challenges Moon Hoax Conspiracy&lt;/a&gt; After decades of almost ignoring claims that the Apollo missions were hoaxed, NASA commissioned aerospace writer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jamesoberg.com/&quot;&gt;James Olberg&lt;/a&gt; to write an official rebuttle.  Perhaps a bit more reasonable than the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasastooge.fsnet.co.uk/&quot;&gt;NASA Stooge&lt;/a&gt;, the book is aimed at the general public.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21456</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:25:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Apollo</category>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>ConspiracyTheory</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>JamesOberg</category>
		<category>Luna</category>
		<category>LunarLanding</category>
		<category>Moon</category>
		<category>MoonLanding</category>
		<category>NASA</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<dc:creator>KirkJobSluder</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6556/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html"&gt;Conspiracy or not?&lt;/a&gt; Convinced to sit and watch FOX&apos;s show on whether we landed on the moon, I found myself wondering why &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/02/19/nasa.moon/index.html&quot;&gt; there was no evidence&lt;/a&gt; against the hoax presented.   Is this is clearly &lt;a href=&quot;http://science.krishna.org/Articles/2000/12/00227.html&quot;&gt; another &lt;/a&gt; feed on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.empusa.clara.net/lunar/lunar1.htm&quot;&gt;conspiracy theories&lt;/a&gt; surrounding JFK&apos;s administration?  Or was it just another &quot;When cars attack?&quot;  (If so, I didn&apos;t find this as funny)



 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6556</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2001 06:39:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apollo</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>FOX</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>moonlanding</category>
		<category>nasa</category>
		<category>space</category>
		<category>spaceflight</category>
		<dc:creator>samsara</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


