<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nationalrail</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nationalrail</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nationalrail' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:02:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:02:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>London to Brighton. Are our attention spans getting shorter?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55197/London%2Dto%2DBrighton%2DAre%2Dour%2Dattention%2Dspans%2Dgetting%2Dshorter</link>
		<description> &lt;strong&gt;London to Brighton in Two Minutes&lt;/strong&gt; (2006) &lt;small&gt;[HI &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lobsterpictures.tv/webcom/lonbri.php&quot;&gt;Apple Quicktime&lt;/a&gt;, LO &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzDqzq0WDXc&quot;&gt;Adobe Flash&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; preceeded by &lt;strong&gt;London to Brighton in Three-and-a-Half Minutes&lt;/strong&gt; (1983) &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tv-ark.org.uk/misc/main/londontobrighton1983.rm&quot;&gt;RealMedia&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tv-ark.org.uk/misc/miscbbcp2-new.html&quot;&gt;context&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt; preceeded by &lt;strong&gt;London to Brighton in Four Minutes &lt;/strong&gt;(1953) &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/lb4mins.ram&quot;&gt;RealMedia&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/history/interludes.htm&quot;&gt;context&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55197</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:02:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>Brighton</category>
		<category>BritishBroadcastingCorporation</category>
		<category>BritishRail</category>
		<category>chugga</category>
		<category>London</category>
		<category>NationalRail</category>
		<category>NetworkRail</category>
		<category>railroad</category>
		<category>railroads</category>
		<category>railway</category>
		<category>railways</category>
		<category>timelapse</category>
		<category>train</category>
		<category>trains</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>riotgrrl69</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18080/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/11/21/amtrak/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;No national railway of a developed country has ever run a profit.&lt;/a&gt;  They&apos;re not supposed to. The correlative economic and social benefits they throw off -- bringing commuters to taxpaying corporations daily, for one thing -- more than offset any net loss they suffer.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;small&gt; [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://camworld.org/&quot;&gt;camworld&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

You don&apos;t run your home&apos;s central heating, air conditioning or plumbing at a profit, so why should a country try to run its infrastructure that way, be it rail, health service, water, ...? Is it forced on us because nationalised services always seem to become fantastically inefficient and bureaucratic?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18080</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2002 19:16:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>amtrak</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>infrastructure</category>
		<category>nationalrail</category>
		<category>railroads</category>
		<dc:creator>southisup</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


