<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with neoconvservativism</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/neoconvservativism</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'neoconvservativism' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:35:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:35:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>How The Left Has Won</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/124960/How%2DThe%2DLeft%2DHas%2DWon</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://jacobin.webfactional.com/2012/08/how-the-left-has-won/&quot;&gt;Or, why is there still socialism in the United States?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;Why, then, would we look for evidence of socialism only where a state seized by radicals of the Left inaugurates a dictatorship of the proletariat? Or, to lower the rhetorical volume and evidentiary stakes, why would we expect to find socialism only where avowed socialists or labor parties contend for state power? We should instead assume that socialism, like capitalism, is a cross-class cultural construction, to which even the bourgeoisie has already made significant contributions&#8200;&#8211;&#8200;just as the proletariat has long made significant contributions to the cross-class construction we know as capitalism. What follows?&lt;/blockquote&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2013:site.124960</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:35:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adamsmith</category>
		<category>bourgeoisie</category>
		<category>capitalism</category>
		<category>catholicchurch</category>
		<category>civilsociety</category>
		<category>feudalism</category>
		<category>gramsci</category>
		<category>greatsociety</category>
		<category>imperialism</category>
		<category>jacobin</category>
		<category>jacobinmagazine</category>
		<category>karlmarx</category>
		<category>labourparty</category>
		<category>left</category>
		<category>leftist</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>liberalism</category>
		<category>marx</category>
		<category>neoconservative</category>
		<category>neoconvservativism</category>
		<category>neoliberal</category>
		<category>neoliberalism</category>
		<category>newdeal</category>
		<category>newleft</category>
		<category>progressive</category>
		<category>progressives</category>
		<category>progressivism</category>
		<category>proletariat</category>
		<category>radical</category>
		<category>radicalism</category>
		<category>smith</category>
		<category>socialdemocracy</category>
		<category>socialdemocratic</category>
		<category>socialism</category>
		<category>socialist</category>
		<category>statism</category>
		<category>tradeunion</category>
		<category>volunteerarmy</category>
		<category>warofposition</category>
		<category>welfarestate</category>
		<dc:creator>the man of twists and turns</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


