<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with newspapers and Iraq</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/newspapers+Iraq</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'newspapers' and 'Iraq' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:19:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:19:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Unpopular premier slams popular press</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/62007/Unpopular%2Dpremier%2Dslams%2Dpopular%2Dpress</link>
		<description> The UK media is like a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6744261.stm&quot;&gt;&quot;Feral Beast&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, and is undermining Britain, says Tony Blair. Simon Kelner, editor of The Independent, &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,2101196,00.html&quot;&gt;responds&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/gallery/2007/jun/12/1?picture=330015020&quot;&gt;Some reasons why Blair might not be too keen on the press&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.62007</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:19:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Blair</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Feral</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Media</category>
		<category>Newspapers</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>TonyBlair</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who do the troops support?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56065/Who%2Ddo%2Dthe%2Dtroops%2Dsupport</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/110406Z.shtml"&gt;US Military Papers open fire on Rummy.&lt;/a&gt; Tomorrow, the Army Times -- and all other Military Times papers, including Navy and Air Force Times -- will run an editorial calling for Donald Rumsfeld to tender his resignation or be fired, due to his gross incompetence in handling the Iraq quagmire.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56065</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:01:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>lazaruslong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US Army Used Reporters for Own Ends in Iraq War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28150/US%2DArmy%2DUsed%2DReporters%2Dfor%2DOwn%2DEnds%2Din%2DIraq%2DWar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=industryNews&amp;amp;storyID=3396575"&gt;U.S. Army Used Media Cover in Iraq for Own Ends&lt;/a&gt; which sounds like a big old bowl of yellow journalism but isn&apos;t really, at least I don&apos;t think so. It was more to refute the Iraqi Minister of Lies talking about the whooping the Iraqi war machine was delivering to the coalition forces.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The main issue that the reporters had was that they were only getting the one side of the story and not the Iraqi perspective. 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But it raises some questions about the supposed objectivity of the media. Is this a proper use of them? To help achieve military goals? Or to try to avoid more unnecessary deaths?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28150</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:51:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>USArmy</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<dc:creator>fenriq</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraqi newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25983/Iraqi%2Dnewspapers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.almuajaha.com/"&gt;Al-Muajaha, &quot;The Iraqi Witness,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; is a new &lt;a href=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/05/24/iraq_news/index.html&gt;independent newspaper&lt;/a&gt; in Baghdad that&apos;s also published online.  In fact, &lt;a href=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,5944-685972,00.html&gt;new newspapers are appearing&lt;/a&gt; in Iraq almost every day, though many are mouthpieces for political parties.  I find this proliferation of information to be a good sign.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25983</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2003 11:24:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


