<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with newyorker and gladwell</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/newyorker+gladwell</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'newyorker' and 'gladwell' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:56:04 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:56:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The First 10,000 Hours...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/115462/The%2DFirst%2D10000%2DHours</link>
		<description> Long before he became a staff writer for &lt;em&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; and the bestselling author of &lt;em&gt;The Tipping Point&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Blink&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Outliers&lt;/em&gt;, Malcolm Gladwell began his career writing for a politically conservative monthly magazine. Some of &lt;a href=&quot;http://spectator.org/archives/1986/02/01/chuck-colson-vs-the-fundamenta&quot;&gt;his early work for &lt;em&gt;The American Spectator&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is now available online.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2012:site.115462</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:56:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<dc:creator>pjdoland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gladwell for Dummies</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/86425/Gladwell%2Dfor%2DDummies</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;Such are the contradictions that seem to riddle not just Gladwell&apos;s thinking but the thinking on Gladwell&apos;s thinking, and perhaps even the thinking on thinking on that, and it is precisely these slippery but substantive contradictions that have allowed Gladwell to tout his revolutionary &quot;big ideas&quot; without couching them in anything so mundane as a logical, well-supported or otherwise sound argument.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20091123/tkacik/single&quot;&gt;Gladwell for Dummies&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.86425</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:46:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blink</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>malcolmgladwell</category>
		<category>maureentkacik</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>outliers</category>
		<category>thenation</category>
		<category>tippingpoint</category>
		<category>tkacik</category>
		<category>whatthedogsaw</category>
		<dc:creator>defenestration</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Folsomism vs. Activism</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84022/Folsomism%2Dvs%2DActivism</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/08/10/090810fa_fact_gladwell?printable=true&quot;&gt;Atticus Finch and the limits of Southern liberalism.&lt;/a&gt;  An essay in the latest &lt;em&gt;The New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; by Malcolm Gladwell.  &quot;Atticus Finch is faced with jurors who have one set of standards for white people like the Ewells and another set for black folk like Tom Robinson. His response is to adopt one set of standards for respectable whites like Boo Radley and another for white trash like Bob Ewell. A book that we thought instructed us about the world tells us, instead, about the limitations of Jim Crow liberalism in Maycomb, Alabama.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84022</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:15:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atticus</category>
		<category>atticusfinch</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>malcolmgladwell</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>tokillamockingbird</category>
		<dc:creator>billysumday</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Gladwell gets a blog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49462/Gladwell%2Dgets%2Da%2Dblog</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gladwell.typepad.com/"&gt;Will Malcolm Gladwell&apos;s blog&lt;/a&gt; be as good as his &lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; articles and books?  Will it be better?  I&apos;m always fascinated when &quot;big name&quot; people start blogging.  Will he be interesting and personal, dry and professional, or will the blog crash and burn?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49462</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:47:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<dc:creator>cmaxmagee</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>How to think about prescription drugs.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/36652/How%2Dto%2Dthink%2Dabout%2Dprescription%2Ddrugs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://newyorker.com/critics/atlarge/?041025crat_atlarge"&gt;How to think about prescription drugs.&lt;/a&gt; Malcolm Gladwell&apos;s latest piece in&lt;i&gt; The New Yorker&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;The emphasis of the prescription-drug debate is all wrong. We&apos;ve been focussed on the drug manufacturers. But decisions about prevalence, therapeutic mix, and intensity aren&apos;t made by the producers of drugs. They&#8217;re made by the consumers of drugs.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.36652</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:03:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigpharma</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>pharmaceuticals</category>
		<category>prescription</category>
		<dc:creator>trharlan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16408/</link>
		<description> Malcom Gladwell&apos;s got a new one in the New Yorker about a guy whose investment strategy positions him to profit from unlikely and scary random catastrophes like 9/11. Its&apos; not on newyorker.com, but the story&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://pw1.netcom.com/~ntaleb/&quot;&gt;subject &lt;/a&gt;was kind enough to scan it and &lt;a href=&quot;http://pw1.netcom.com/~ntaleb/newyorker.pdf&quot;&gt;post it&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16408</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:48:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blackswan</category>
		<category>gladwell</category>
		<category>investing</category>
		<category>investments</category>
		<category>malcolmgladwell</category>
		<category>nassimtaleb</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>stockmarket</category>
		<category>taleb</category>
		<dc:creator>luser</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


