Join 3,415 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)

5 posts tagged with newyorktimes by Postroad.
Displaying 1 through 5 of 5.

Related tags:
+ (94)
+ (85)
+ (29)
+ (21)
+ (19)
+ (15)
+ (14)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (12)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (11)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (10)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (9)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (8)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (7)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (6)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (5)
+ (4)
+ (4)
+ (4)


Users that often use this tag:
Fizz (9)
rschram (7)
semmi (7)
y2karl (6)
digaman (5)
Postroad (5)
adrober (5)
Joe Beese (5)
Blake (4)
MiguelCardoso (4)
palegirl (4)
the man of twists ... (4)
Rustic Etruscan (4)
magullo (3)
ParisParamus (3)
sudama (3)
alms (3)
ericb (3)
zarq (3)
BitterOldPunk (3)
specialk420 (3)
oneswellfoop (3)
ocherdraco (3)
Potomac Avenue (3)
Diablevert (3)
Scoop (2)
hippybear (2)
not_the_water (2)
The Whelk (2)
SkylitDrawl (2)
crossoverman (2)
cashman (2)
jason's_planet (2)
storybored (2)
Weebot (2)
goodnewsfortheinsane (2)
OmieWise (2)
blahblahblah (2)
mcgraw (2)
box (2)
Plunge (2)
gottabefunky (2)
PrinceValium (2)
gsteff (2)
lilboo (2)
gen (2)
Gilbert (2)
Neale (2)
kirkaracha (2)
PeteyStock (2)
pardonyou? (2)
arco (2)
Oxydude (2)
msacheson (2)
dogmatic (2)
darren (2)
subpixel (2)
skallas (2)
tiaka (2)
netbros (2)

More On Anti-Semitism at Columbia

More On Anti-Semitism at Columbia My interest in this story is primarily about how the New York Times, considered one of the great newspapers world-wide, in fact sucks!---"A week ago, Deacon and the Trunk posted on the release of a report by Columbia University on its investigation of students' charges of anti-semitic conduct by several of the university's professors. The report mostly exonerated the professors, while, at the same time, recording behavior by them which was appalling. One of the points we noted was the craven behavior of the New York Times, which said that it agreed not to report the viewpoint of the complaining students in exchange for early access to Columbia's report. The Trunk wrote: But what about the New York Times? Is it conceivable that the Times would enter into an agreement not to talk to the subjects of a report in exchange for being given access to the report a few hours before it is made available to the public? [The Times admits it!]
posted by Postroad on Apr 6, 2005 - 50 comments

The Emperor's New Hump

The Emperor's New Hump In the weeks leading up to the November 2 election, the New York Times was abuzz with excitement. Besides the election itself, the paper’s reporters were hard at work on two hot investigative projects, each of which could have a major impact on the outcome of the tight presidential race. One week before Election Day, the Times (10/25/04) ran a hard-hitting and controversial exposé of the Al-Qaqaa ammunition dump—identified by U.N. inspectors before the war as containing 400 tons of special high-density explosives useful for aircraft bombings and as triggers for nuclear devices, but left unguarded and available to insurgents by U.S. forces after the invasion. On Thursday, just three days after that first exposé, the paper was set to run a second, perhaps more explosive piece, exposing how George W. Bush had worn an electronic cueing device in his ear and probably cheated during the presidential debates.
posted by Postroad on Feb 5, 2005 - 121 comments

The Pastiche of a Presidency, Imitating a Life, in 957 Pages

The Pastiche of a Presidency, Imitating a Life, in 957 Pages This is a very bad review of the Clinton book, soon to be released. My question: why has the New York Times placed a book review on its front page? Would they have done this if the book were given a good review? Is the "paper of record" making a clear-cut statement about its feelings about Clinton? Has any other book review made the front page of the NY Times? I for one plan to read the book. I recall that Edmund Wilson once said: always stick to primary sources rather relying upon what some scholar or reviewer has to say about a book. Finally, Clinton is out of office (alas). How much longer will small and jealous puppies chase after The Big Dog?
posted by Postroad on Jun 20, 2004 - 33 comments

Pentagon Plans a Computer System That Would Peek at Personal Data of Americans

Pentagon Plans a Computer System That Would Peek at Personal Data of Americans And this is justified because of National Security. We will lose much that is personal, private, but in turn we will be protefted against the bad guys. Or will we? When NASA and CIA claim they need to spy domestically, and computers gather all data on Americans, what is left that is not what Orwell had suggested might our future be like?Or, as Morth Sahl once labelled a comic record: TheFuture Lies Ahead."
posted by Postroad on Nov 9, 2002 - 97 comments

Paid ad placements on web sites.

Paid ad placements on web sites. Why not? They are just about everywhere else.
posted by Postroad on Jun 4, 2001 - 13 comments

Page: 1