<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nicotine</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nicotine</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nicotine' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:54:58 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:54:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>junkification</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82391/junkification</link>
		<description> Are US tobacco companies conspiring to make &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090110085918.htm&quot;&gt;tobacco more addictive&lt;/a&gt; through additives or &lt;a href=&quot;http://senate.ucsf.edu/tobacco/executives1994congress.html&quot;&gt;aren&apos;t they&lt;/a&gt;? Ever since the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tobacco_additives:_Cigarette_engineering_and_nicotine_addiction&quot;&gt;first reports&lt;/a&gt; published in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ash.org.uk/ash_l8bjwmun.htm&quot;&gt;1999&lt;/a&gt;, this has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/393075.stm&quot;&gt;debated&lt;/a&gt; off and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1437399/The-tobacco-additives-that-keep-you-hooked.html&quot;&gt;on&lt;/a&gt; for years as the tobacco lobby defended itself against allegations of racketeering and outright lies. Recently&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/05/23-2&quot;&gt; they lost the case&lt;/a&gt;. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://whyfiles.org/183smoking/2.html&quot;&gt;the question&lt;/a&gt; of American cigarettes being &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/61061.php&quot;&gt;more addictive&lt;/a&gt; than others &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/sci_tech/features/health/tobaccotrial/inacigarette.htm&quot;&gt;still remains&lt;/a&gt; unsettled.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.82391</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:54:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>addiction</category>
		<category>additive</category>
		<category>cigarette</category>
		<category>cigarettes</category>
		<category>fag</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<category>smoke</category>
		<category>smoking</category>
		<category>tobacco</category>
		<dc:creator>infini</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Can iDrag be far behind?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73398/Can%2DiDrag%2Dbe%2Dfar%2Dbehind</link>
		<description> It looks like a cigarette. It smokes like a cigarette. But it&apos;s actually the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSSP23039020070509&quot;&gt;e-cigarette&lt;/a&gt;, and it might be the future of smoking. Insert a cartridge containing a mixture of nicotine and propylene glycol. When you inhale, a microprocessor senses the air flow and activates an atomizer, which vaporizes the nicotine mixture. It&apos;s tarless, it&apos;s smokeless, and it&apos;s just so... future-y!

Of course, nicotine &lt;a href=&quot;http://health.howstuffworks.com/nicotine7.htm&quot;&gt;isn&apos;t exactly health food&lt;/a&gt; in and of itself.

You can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/&quot;&gt;join the throng,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electronic-cigarettes.net/&quot;&gt;learn&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.njoy.com/faq.php&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt; about the technology, and, of course, read the inevitable &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.e-cig.org/&quot;&gt;blog.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73398</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:18:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ecig</category>
		<category>ecigarette</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<category>smoking</category>
		<category>tar</category>
		<category>tobacco</category>
		<dc:creator>showbiz_liz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Warnings</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51685/Warnings</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.smoke-free.ca/warnings/Australia-warnings.htm"&gt;The Australian cigarette health warnings&lt;/a&gt; have pretty much filtered down to every retail packet that&apos;s bought now. &lt;b&gt;They&apos;re pretty gruesome&lt;/b&gt; and some smoking acquaintances cover them up with stickers. I thought I&apos;d have a look around and see what other countries warnings were like. None of them were pulling any punches except for Uruguay.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51685</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 19:21:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>addiction</category>
		<category>amputation</category>
		<category>australia</category>
		<category>blindness</category>
		<category>cancer</category>
		<category>cigarettes</category>
		<category>cloggedarteries</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>emphysema</category>
		<category>gangrene</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>heartdisease</category>
		<category>impotency</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<category>quit</category>
		<category>smoking</category>
		<category>stroke</category>
		<category>vasculardisease</category>
		<category>warning</category>
		<dc:creator>tellurian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>foxxy!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51384/foxxy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&amp;amp;storyid=2006-05-04T021922Z_01_N03199061_RTRUKOC_0_US-MEXICO-DRUGS.xml"&gt;Fox pussies out.&lt;/a&gt; Recently a bill passed in mexico &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/29/world/americas/29mexico.html&quot;&gt;legalizing &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; drugs&lt;/a&gt; under certain specified quantities.  The bill was promoted By Vincente Fox&apos;s party, and came from his offices.  However he decided not to sign it under U.S. pressure.  
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
There go my vacation plans.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51384</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 01:06:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alcohol</category>
		<category>caffeine</category>
		<category>cocaine</category>
		<category>DMT</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>ecstasy</category>
		<category>ethanol</category>
		<category>heroin</category>
		<category>ketamine</category>
		<category>LSD</category>
		<category>marijuana</category>
		<category>mercury</category>
		<category>methamphetamine</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<category>PCP</category>
		<category>pot</category>
		<category>quaaludes</category>
		<category>shrooms</category>
		<category>tijuana</category>
		<category>viagra</category>
		<category>wii</category>
		<dc:creator>Paris Hilton</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Meta Smoking - who needs a filter!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42790/Meta%2DSmoking%2Dwho%2Dneeds%2Da%2Dfilter</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050611.wxchina0611/BNStory/International"&gt;What&apos;s China Smoking?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42790</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:50:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>beliefs</category>
		<category>china</category>
		<category>cigarettes</category>
		<category>dissonance</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<category>profits</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>smoking</category>
		<category>tobacco</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>People who drink to excess also tend to be chronic smokers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37927/People%2Dwho%2Ddrink%2Dto%2Dexcess%2Dalso%2Dtend%2Dto%2Dbe%2Dchronic%2Dsmokers</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/37896&quot;&gt;Speaking Of&lt;/a&gt; weight loss and exercise... Those who like their booze also like their nicotine.  People who drink to excess also tend to be chronic smokers, and a new report suggests the combination of the two might prove more toxic than either one alone.  a small study found chronic smoking + alcohol dependence = increased severity of brain damage. The frontal lobes (short-term storage sites) turn out to be the most damaged. A separate study used rats to show that alcoholism and excessive food intake may share the same chemical pathways in the brain.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/health/feeds/hscout/2004/12/15/hscout522893.html&quot;&gt;Forbes&lt;/a&gt; has the HealthDayNews report that focuses mainly on the smokes, &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6693599/&quot;&gt;MSNBC&lt;/a&gt; looks more at the eats. They also have an interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3152832/&quot;&gt;Addictions Sections&lt;/a&gt;. Could it be that some folks are just prone to addictions and everyone settles on something different?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37927</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:35:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>addiction</category>
		<category>addictions</category>
		<category>alcohol</category>
		<category>booze</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>braindamage</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>drinking</category>
		<category>forbes</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<category>smoking</category>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19166/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/14/health/14TOBA.html"&gt;Another smoking gun.&lt;/a&gt; Tobacco companies fought the marketing of anti-smoking products in the 1980s and &apos;90s, by exerting financial pressure on companies that make nicotine gum and patches--like Dow Chemical. (NYT, reg req&apos;d - CBS News version &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/national/main518608.shtml&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19166</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:34:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>cigarettes</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<category>NYtimes</category>
		<category>smoking</category>
		<category>tobacco</category>
		<dc:creator>gottabefunky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16267/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/HEALTH/04/10/nicotine.lollipops/index.html"&gt;FDA stops nicotine lollipop, lip balm sales&lt;/a&gt; As a follow up to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/16046&quot;&gt;This Thread&lt;/a&gt;, kiss your pops good bye...
CNN Says The Food and Drug Administration warned three pharmacies Wednesday to stop selling nicotine lollipops and nicotine lip balm on the Internet, calling the products &quot;illegal.&quot; They said said the lollipops and lip balm are &quot;unapproved drugs&quot; that need, but do not have, FDA approval. And the pops are &quot;candy-like products present a risk of accidental use by children.&quot; 



 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16267</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2002 04:39:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>FDA</category>
		<category>lollipops</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16046/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nicotinelollipops.com/"&gt;Nicotine Lollipops:&lt;/a&gt; Next up on the list of products to help you quit smoking but not the addiction. NicoStop, NicoPop and Likatine are some of the brand names these laced suckers carry, but the interesting thing here is that it&apos;s not a giant pharmaceutical company making them -- it&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thecompounder.com/html/nicotine_lollipop.html&quot;&gt;your&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nucara.com/nicolollipops/&quot;&gt;neighborhood&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hooksrx.com/nicotine.html&quot;&gt;pharmacy&lt;/a&gt;, and they&apos;re doing it below the radar of the FDA. &lt;i&gt;(more inside.)&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16046</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:35:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fda</category>
		<category>lollipops</category>
		<category>nicotine</category>
		<dc:creator>me3dia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


