<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nuclearprograms</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nuclearprograms</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nuclearprograms' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:26:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:26:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>How to Deal With North Korea &amp;amp; Q&amp;amp;A: Should U.S. Launch Direct Talks with N. Korea?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24422/How%2Dto%2DDeal%2DWith%2DNorth%2DKorea%2Dand%2DQampA%2DShould%2DUS%2DLaunch%2DDirect%2DTalks%2Dwith%2DN%2DKorea</link>
		<description> Here are two thoughtful pieces on the North Korean Crisis.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
From Foreign Affairs comes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20030301faessay10336/james-t-laney-jason-t-shaplen/how-to-deal-with-north-korea.html&quot; title=&quot;SUMMARY - Pyongyang&apos;s belligerent behavior should not obscure other dramatic conciliatory steps North Korea has taken in recent years--steps suggesting that, even now, a solution lies within reach. The trick is to craft a plan that does not reward the North for its misdeeds. In such a plan, all major outside powers should guarantee the security of the entire Korean Peninsula first. This will remove Pyongyang&apos;s excuse for nuclear proliferation--and break the deadlock on the world&apos;s last Cold War frontier.&quot;&gt;How to Deal With North Korea&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From the New York Times comes&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/cfr/international/mustreads031003.html?pagewanted=print&amp;position=top&quot; title=&quot;Donald Gregg, U.S. ambassador to South Korea in the first Bush administration, says the situation with North Korea is &apos;&apos;quite dangerous&apos;&apos; and that immediate direct talks between Washington and Pyongyang are necessary to stem North Korea&apos;s development of nuclear weapons.&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Q&amp;A: Should U.S. Launch Direct Talks with North Korea?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here, by the way, is the fourth footnote from &lt;i&gt;How to Deal With North Korea &lt;/i&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Had the Agreed Framework not been signed in 1994, the North&apos;s plutonium-based program would by today have produced enough plutonium for up to 30 nuclear weapons. Critics of the accord should not ignore this fact.&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24422</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 01:26:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>NorthKorea</category>
		<category>nuclearprograms</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>nukes</category>
		<category>plutonium</category>
		<category>UnitedStates</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


