<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nutrition and fat</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nutrition+fat</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nutrition' and 'fat' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:46:01 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:46:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Doritos, that counts as a cheese, right?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30936/Doritos%2Dthat%2Dcounts%2Das%2Da%2Dcheese%2Dright</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.fritolay.com/nutrition/default.shtml"&gt;The food pyramid has been updated again, apparently.&lt;/a&gt; According to Frito-Lay, your major food groups now consist of fruits, vegetables, protein, dairy, and Doritos.  &lt;small&gt;(via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calpundit.com/archives/003116.html&quot; _blank&gt;Calpundit&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30936</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>diet</category>
		<category>Doritos</category>
		<category>fat</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>FoodPyramid</category>
		<category>Frito-Lay</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>promotion</category>
		<category>pyramid</category>
		<category>snacks</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Create-a-meal</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29767/Createameal</link>
		<description> &lt;strong&gt;Create-a-meal&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;[note: &lt;em&gt;flash&lt;/em&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; ... comes in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calorieking.com/createameal/?menu=4&quot;&gt;mcdonalds&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calorieking.com/createameal/?menu=2&quot;&gt;subway&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calorieking.com/createameal/?menu=4&quot;&gt;barbeque&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calorieking.com/createameal/?menu=3&quot;&gt;pizza hut&lt;/a&gt; flavors.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29767</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:08:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>barbeque</category>
		<category>calories</category>
		<category>Create-a-meal</category>
		<category>fat</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>mcdonalds</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>pizza</category>
		<category>pizzahut</category>
		<category>subway</category>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fat of the land</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26996/Fat%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dland</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56152-2003Jul14.html?nav=hptoc_h"&gt;What&apos;s on the menu?&lt;/a&gt; Perhaps fat and calories. &lt;i&gt;&quot;Five states have taken up similar bills this year, with none being passed so far.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; Will bills like these ever get passed? Will we ever see nutrition facts on fast food wrappers? Will consumers ever bother to read them?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26996</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:26:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>calories</category>
		<category>fastfood</category>
		<category>fat</category>
		<category>labels</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>nutritionlabels</category>
		<dc:creator>sharksandwich</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>you&apos;re my butterfly, sugar baby</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25329/youre%2Dmy%2Dbutterfly%2Dsugar%2Dbaby</link>
		<description> Yesterday the World Health Organization launched a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.who.int/mediacentre/releases/2003/pr32/en/&quot; _new&gt;report on diet and nutrition&lt;/a&gt;, saying that sugar should be restricted to 10% of caloric intake. Predictably, the sugar industry (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sugar.org/newsroom/releases.html&quot; _new&gt;press releases&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,3604,942354,00.html&quot; _new&gt;threw fits&lt;/a&gt; and called on their cronies in Congress to cut off WHO funding. Apparently they&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,940287,00.html&quot; _new&gt;fighting and clawing&lt;/a&gt; even more than the tobacco industry in similar circusmtances, and WHO fears that lobbyists have more power with the Bush administration. The SA believes that inactivity, not our increased sugar consumption, is the primary cause of the obesity epidemic. Are we in for another few years of declarations of junk science and endless gov&apos;t investigations into what seems obvious, &lt;i&gt;a la&lt;/i&gt; most environmental and health concerns?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25329</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:03:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BigSugar</category>
		<category>carbohydrates</category>
		<category>diet</category>
		<category>fat</category>
		<category>lobby</category>
		<category>lobbyists</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>PublicHealth</category>
		<category>sugar</category>
		<category>tobacco</category>
		<category>WHO</category>
		<category>WorldHealthOrganization</category>
		<dc:creator>fotzepolitic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


