<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nycmap</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nycmap</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nycmap' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:26:58 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:26:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Notes from underground</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47528/Notes%2Dfrom%2Dunderground</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.onnyturf.com/subwaymap.php"&gt;Google Map NYC Subway Hack!&lt;/a&gt; Like most New Yorkers, I do most of my intra-city travel via subway.  Back when &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com&quot; _blank&gt;Google Maps&lt;/a&gt; debuted, I sent in a request to have subway info added to the NYC maps.  

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://mta.info/nyct/maps/submap.htm&quot; _blank&gt;MTA&apos;s subway map&lt;/a&gt; focuses on the train lines, with very little street info.  But you need a map that shows both subway and street data to figure out which train(s) to take to a given destination... and while you can buy printed maps of this kind, I&apos;ve never found one online -- until now.

Something called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/transit&quot; _blank&gt;Google Transit&lt;/a&gt; is in the works, but it only seems to cover Portland, OR at the moment.  Thankfully, OnNYTurf has stepped into the breach with a beautiful, practical &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onnyturf.com/subwaymap.php&quot; _blank&gt;Google Maps hack&lt;/a&gt;.  Cool!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47528</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:26:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>googlehacks</category>
		<category>googlemaps</category>
		<category>nyc</category>
		<category>nycmap</category>
		<category>subways</category>
		<dc:creator>Artifice_Eternity</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19157/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0233/baard.php"&gt;There&apos;s a guy&lt;/a&gt; with an &quot;immensely detailed, three-dimensional, interactive, constantly updated map of New York City,&quot; which &quot;could provide the DNA for a re-created city&quot; if something happened to destroy New York.  Besides the nitpicking (do you want to recreate every awning and kiosk?), there&apos;s the big question: does it make sense to try to recreate in detail something that&apos;s gone?  Or as the article puts it, &quot;At what point do we accept the reality of loss?&quot;  And if a city were destroyed so utterly it couldn&apos;t be recreated, would its surviving inhabitants wander the world endlessly, keeping their lost home alive in their hearts and customs, like R.A. Lafferty&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scifi.com/scifiction/classics/classics_archive/lafferty2/lafferty21.html&quot;&gt;Angelenos&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19157</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:45:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>lafferty</category>
		<category>Leidner</category>
		<category>loss</category>
		<category>maps</category>
		<category>NewYork</category>
		<category>newyorkcity</category>
		<category>NYCMap</category>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


