<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nytimes and GeorgeWBush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nytimes+GeorgeWBush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nytimes' and 'GeorgeWBush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:24:50 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:24:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Getting MAD at Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68824/Getting%2DMAD%2Dat%2DBush</link>
		<description> In all its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccomics.com/mad/?action=timeline&quot;&gt;55 year history&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccomics.com/mad/&quot;&gt;MAD magazine&lt;/a&gt; has been known &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tdn.com/articles/2007/03/25/this_day/news01.txt&quot;&gt;much more for media satire than political satire&lt;/a&gt;... anything political was often camouflaged as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccomics.com/mad/media/downloads/fanaticfour_poster.jpg&quot;&gt;movie&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccomics.com/mad/media/downloads/zeroes_poster.jpg&quot;&gt;TV parody&lt;/a&gt; and generally &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.collectmad.com/madcoversite/mad197.html&quot;&gt;less partisan than most&lt;/a&gt;. (How can you take their politics seriously when they offered &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.collectmad.com/madcoversite/mad218.html&quot;&gt;Alfred E. Neuman&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.collectmad.com/madcoversite/mad217.html&quot;&gt;for President?&lt;/a&gt;) Another thing about MAD is how rarely it goes outside its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dccomics.com/mad/?action=idiots&quot;&gt;&quot;Usual Cast of Idiots&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://users.ipfw.edu/slaubau/madlist.htm&quot;&gt;for content&lt;/a&gt;. Well, things have changed, as the MAD editors used 10 Pulitzer Prize Winning Op/Ed Cartoonists to illustrate the incendiarilly-titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/04/business/04mad.php&quot;&gt;&#8220;Why George W. Bush Is in Favor of Global Warming&#8221;&lt;/a&gt;. The usually web-shy MAD even allowed the New York Times to put &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2008/02/03/business/0204-MAD_index.html&quot;&gt;most of the piece online in a slideshow&lt;/a&gt;. Self-derail: While looking for past political content from MAD online, I uncovered &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.collectmad.com/madcoversite/mad166.html&quot;&gt;this cover from 1974 that would probably be controversial today&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68824</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>editorialcartoonists</category>
		<category>finger</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>globalwarming</category>
		<category>mad</category>
		<category>madmagazine</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>politicalsatire</category>
		<category>satire</category>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An Executive Order Along Torture&apos;s Path</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38012/An%2DExecutive%2DOrder%2DAlong%2DTortures%2DPath</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf&quot; title=&quot;&apos;&apos;I have been told that all interrogation techniques previously authorized by the Executive Order are still on the table but that certain techniques can only be used if very high-level authority is granted.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;&lt;small&gt;Request for guidance regarding the OGC&apos;s EC regarding detainee abuse, referring to &#8220;interrogation techniques made lawful&#8221; by the &#8220;President&apos;s Executive Order.&#8221;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; comes  from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/torturefoia/released/&quot;&gt;Records Released in Response to Torture FOIA Request&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/news/NewsPrint.cfm?ID=17216&amp;c=206&quot; title=&quot;The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and &apos;&apos;sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc.&apos;&apos; The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from &apos;&apos;On Scene Commander--Baghdad&apos;&apos; to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized. &quot;&gt;Smoking Gun ?&lt;/a&gt; asks the ACLU--or just another stepping stone from &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6733558/site/newsweek/print/1/displaymode/1098/&quot; title=&quot;In a Jan. 25, 2002, memo to Bush, Gonzales said the new war on terror &apos;&apos;renders obsolete Geneva&apos;s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners.&apos;&apos; Some State Department lawyers charge that Gonzales misrepresented so many legal considerations and facts (including hard conclusions by State&apos;s Southeast Asia bureau about the nature of the Taliban) that one lawyer considers the memo to be &apos;&apos;an ethical breach.&apos;&apos; In response, a senior White House official says Gonzales&apos;s memo was only a &apos;&apos;draft&apos;&apos; and just one part of an extensive decision-making process in which all views were aired.&quot;&gt;Torture&apos;s Path&lt;/a&gt; ? As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/16/politics/16jag.html?ei=5090&amp;en=5016ee06544b6bc4&amp;ex=1260939600&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;Several former high-ranking military lawyers say they are discussing ways to oppose President Bush&apos;s nomination of Alberto Gonzales to be attorney general, asserting that Gonzales&apos;s supervision of legal memorandums that appeared to sanction harsh treatment of detainees, even torture, showed unsound legal judgment.&quot;&gt;Ex-Military Lawyers Object to Bush Cabinet Nominee&lt;/a&gt;, and in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/12/17/memo/print.html&quot; title=&quot;Renewed exposure of prisoner abuse, torture and even murder by American military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan is widening already deep divisions between the Pentagon and the intelligence community -- and creating an untenable situation for Donald Rumsfeld, the beleaguered secretary of defense. A recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &apos;&apos;marching orders&apos;&apos; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from the defense secretary himself. In recent days, a coalition of human rights groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights has brought new cases of abuse to public attention. Using the Freedom of Information Act, they have pried thousands of pages of previously secret documents from the Defense Department and other agencies.&quot;&gt;Torture begins at the top&lt;/a&gt;, Joe Conason suggests that a recently disclosed FBI memo indicates that &quot;marching orders&quot; to abandon traditional interrogation methods came from Defense Secretary Rumsfeld himself and all the while &lt;a href=&quot;http://politics.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5083701-110481,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Fresh allegations about a regime of torture and humiliation inflicted on detainees by their American captors at Guant&amp;#0225;namo Bay have been made by a Briton still held there, according to Foreign Office documents seen by the Guardian. The claims by Martin Mubanga, from London, are the latest to surface from the prison where the US holds 550 Muslim men it claims are terrorists in conditions that have sparked worldwide condemnation. &quot;&gt;Guant&amp;#0225;namo torture and humiliation still going on, says shackled Briton&lt;/a&gt;. (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38012</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:53:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>AlbertoGonzales</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>ExecutiveOrder</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformationAct</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>Interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Torture</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The phrase &apos;&apos;Banana Republican&apos;&apos; comes to mind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30617/The%2Dphrase%2DBanana%2DRepublican%2Dcomes%2Dto%2Dmind</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/07/politics/07CND-FUND.html?position=&amp;en=d19dbdf1fad7763f&amp;ex=1068267600&amp;?ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;Although the dollar&apos;s adjustment could occur gradually over an extended period, the possible global risk of a disorderly exchange rate adjustment, especially to financial markets, cannot be ignored. the International Monetary Fund warned in a new report on Washington&apos;s fiscal stance. An abrupt weakening of investor sentiment vis-a-vis the dollar could possibly lead to adverse consequences both domestically and abroad.&quot;&gt;  I.M.F. Report Says U.S. Deficits Threaten World Economy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;With its rising budget deficit and ballooning trade imbalance, the United States is running up a foreign debt of such record-breaking proportions that it threatens the financial stability of the global economy, according to a report released Wednesday by the International Monetary Fund. Prepared by a team of I.M.F. economists, the report sounded a loud alarm about the shaky fiscal foundation of the United States, questioning the wisdom of the Bush administration&apos;s tax cuts and warning that large budget deficits pose &quot;significant risks&quot; not just for the United States but for the rest of the world. The report warns that the United States&apos; net financial obligations to the rest of the world could be equal to 40 percent of its total economy within a few years--&quot;an unprecedented level of external debt for a large industrial country,&quot; according to the fund, that could play havoc with the value of the dollar and international exchange rates.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;From The Brookings Institute: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brook.edu/views/papers/orszag/20040105.htm&quot; title=&quot;The adverse consequences of sustained large budget deficits may well be far larger and occur more suddenly than traditional analysis suggests, however. Substantial deficits projected far into the future can cause a fundamental shift in market expectations and a related loss of confidence both at home and abroad. The unfavorable dynamic effects that could ensue are largely if not entirely excluded from the conventional analysis of budget deficits. This omission is understandable and appropriate in the context of deficits that are small and temporary; it is increasingly untenable, however, in an environment with deficits that are large and permanent. Substantial ongoing deficits may severely and adversely affect expectations and confidence, which in turn can generate a self-reinforcing negative cycle among the underlying fiscal deficit, financial markets, and the real economy:&quot;&gt;Sustained Budget Deficits: Longer-Run U.S. Economic Performance and the Risk of Financial and Fiscal Disarray&lt;/a&gt; (Full Report &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brook.edu/views/papers/orszag/20040105.pdf&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30617</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>deficit</category>
		<category>dollar</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>IMF</category>
		<category>InternationalMontaryFund</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>USDeficit</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Khaki and Camo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26163/Khaki%2Dand%2DCamo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/03/opinion/03KRUG.html"&gt;Paul Krugman&lt;/a&gt; writes that the Bush administration will fight a &quot;khaki election&quot; next year, taking advantage of the general good feeling after the Iraq war. The original khaki election was the British election of 1900, contested during the Boer War. Our armed forces don&apos;t really wear khaki so much anymore and I think we need a new term. I suggest calling 2004 the &quot;Camo Election.&quot; Any better suggestions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26163</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:15:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Election2004</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>khaki</category>
		<category>KhakiElection</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>PaulKrugman</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>Mekon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19634/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/01/opinion/01BRZE.html"&gt;&quot;Any further strikes against Americans will thus be a painful reminder that the war has not been won.&lt;/a&gt; Sadly, a main reason will be America&apos;s reluctance to focus on the political roots of the terrorist atrocity of Sept. 11.&quot;

opinions on this piece from the original sponsor of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mujahideen.fsnet.co.uk/speech/bin-laden-10nov2001.htm&quot;&gt;Mujahideen&lt;/a&gt;?
username: metafilter46 password: metafilter

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19634</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:38:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>Brzezinski</category>
		<category>extremism</category>
		<category>geopolitics</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>OpEd</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>ZbigniewBrzezinski</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14679/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/11/politics/11LIBR.html?todaysheadlines"&gt;The Battle Over Bush&apos;s Gov. Papers.&lt;/a&gt; What are they hiding?  Executive order blocking Presidential papers, refusing to turn over Energy Taskforce member list, and now this!  There must be something to hide.  But what?!?!?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14679</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:42:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>Governor</category>
		<category>GubernatorialPapers</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>papers</category>
		<category>Texas</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<dc:creator>bas67</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10413/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/16/international/16EURO.html"&gt;European leaders trying to bring balance to American response.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;...Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has offered Mr. Bush his full support, insisted on Friday that any retaliation &quot;must and will be based on hard evidence,&quot; and his spokesman has said that the support does not amount to a &apos;blank check.&apos; &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10413</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:47:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>retaliation</category>
		<category>tonyblair</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Brilliantcrank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


