<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nytimes and law</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nytimes+law</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nytimes' and 'law' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:33:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:33:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Europeans: Do you want a total war on piracy?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29055/Europeans%2DDo%2Dyou%2Dwant%2Da%2Dtotal%2Dwar%2Don%2Dpiracy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/20/business/worldbusiness/20lobby.html?ex=1067227200&amp;amp;en=8ec9a2bb65c245c9&amp;amp;ei=5062&amp;amp;partner=GOOGLE"&gt;Europe&apos;s not-too-modest anti-piracy proposal.&lt;/a&gt; If accepted, it means that &quot;not only could a teenager who downloaded a music file be sent to jail under it; so too could managers of the Internet service provider that the teenager happened to use, whether they knew what the teenager was doing or not.&quot; The proposal is being spearheaded by French parliamentarian Janelly Fourtou. Coincidentally enough, her husband is the chief executive of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vivendiuniversal.com/vu/en/home/index.cfm&quot; title=&quot;One of the world&apos;s largest record companies&quot;&gt;Vivendi Universal&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29055</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:33:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>EU</category>
		<category>Europe</category>
		<category>JanellyFourtou</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>VivendiUniversal</category>
		<dc:creator>Ljubljana</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18359/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/08/opinion/08WILE.html"&gt;Scalia&lt;/a&gt; gives divinity school students a peek at what his activism is really about.  I can&apos;t say it any better than he does so I&apos;ll quote: &quot;The reaction of people of faith to this tendency of democracy to obscure the divine authority behind government should not be resignation to it, but the resolution to combat it as effectively as possible.&quot;

Of course we knew Scalia detested democracy on 12/12/2000 with his decision that infamous day but now he admits favoritism to theocracy.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18359</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>Scalia</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18198/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/02/national/02SAUD.html?todaysheadlines"&gt;Ah, the law in Florida. (NYT)&lt;/a&gt; The rich princess pushed her maid down a flight of stairs, but will be allowed to plead no contest to a misdemeanor charge of battery without having to appear in court, pay a $1,000 fine and give a judge a letter of regret about injuries to her Indonesian maid in the incident.
All this because the maid cannot be in court. After she went home to Jakarta in May for her mother&apos;s funeral, the United States Embassy there denied her a visa to return to Florida and testify on the grounds that she might try to stay in this country illegally. The maid is also the primary witness in a federal investigation of the princess for possibly employing Ms. Soryono under conditions of involuntary servitude, the Justice Department said. After the court hearing in Orlando, this federal investigation appears likely to end without charges.



 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18198</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:08:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>maid</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Orlando</category>
		<category>princess</category>
		<category>royalty</category>
		<category>Saudi</category>
		<category>SaudiArabia</category>
		<dc:creator>semmi</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17496/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/30/politics/30SPY.html"&gt;Government Will Ease Limits on Domestic Spying by F.B.I.&lt;/a&gt; (NY Times link) &lt;i&gt;As part of a sweeping effort to transform the F.B.I. into a domestic terrorism prevention agency, Attorney General John Ashcroft has decided to relax restrictions on the bureau&apos;s ability to conduct domestic spying in counterterrorism operations, senior government officials said today.&lt;/i&gt; 

Here&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30427-2002May29.html&quot;&gt;Wash. Post&apos;s &lt;/a&gt;take on the story.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17496</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2002 09:29:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ashcroft</category>
		<category>AttorneyGeneral</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>counterterrorism</category>
		<category>domestic</category>
		<category>FBI</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>JohnAshcroft</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16933/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Attacks-Indictment.html"&gt;Judge declares terrorism detainments unconstitutional&lt;/a&gt; (NYTimes link)  -  A federal judge in NY has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/courtweb/pdf/D02NYSC/02-04170.PDF&quot;&gt;ruled&lt;/a&gt; that the Justice Department abused the material witness statute when it imprisoned a Jordanian college student living in San Diego.  The Justice Dept is, of course, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Attacks-Indictment.html&quot;&gt;appealing&lt;/a&gt; the ruling.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16933</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 10:44:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>detainment</category>
		<category>jordan</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>newyork</category>
		<category>ny</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>ruling</category>
		<category>sandiego</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>Irontom</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14635/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/09/opinion/09HOLL.html"&gt;Senator Hollings makes the case for a special council to look into the Enron affair.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;(NY Times link). &lt;/b&gt;San Antonio columnist &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.mysanantonio.com/story.cfm?xla=saen&amp;xlb=1055&amp;xlc=602461&amp;xld=1055&quot;&gt;Jan Jarboe Russell&lt;/a&gt; argues for the same. Here&apos;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/enron/story/0,11337,645134,00.html&quot;&gt;Guardian &lt;/a&gt; article on the situation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14635</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2002 11:40:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>Enron</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>Hollings</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>senator</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14148/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/24/politics/24CND-CAMP.html"&gt;Is this a real chance at campaign finance reform&lt;/a&gt; or are we just in for more partisan back and forth that in the end won&apos;t change much of anything? (NY Times link) And how long will the &quot;Enron effect&quot; last?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14148</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:47:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>campaign</category>
		<category>CampaignFinance</category>
		<category>CampaignFinanceReform</category>
		<category>campaigns</category>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>willrich</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9356/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/30/opinion/30LESS.html"&gt;This NYT article&lt;/a&gt; on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), written by Prof. Lawrence Lessig (author of an excellent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465039138/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;book&lt;/a&gt; on copyright law and policy in the digital age), raises concerns that were academic prior to the recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/st/010718/28048.html&quot;&gt;arrest &lt;/a&gt;of a Russian software programmer at a Las Vegas computer security convention for violation of the act&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/ip/DMCA/hr2281_dmca_law_19981020_pl105-304.html&quot;&gt; Sec. 1201(a)(1)(A)&apos;s anticircumvention provision&lt;/a&gt;.

Is Lessig right that Sec. 1201 essentially makes coders (and their employers) into &lt;i&gt;de facto &lt;/i&gt;lawmakers and, if so, is this a bad thing?  If Sec. 1201 is bad policy, are there any more reasonable alternatives for effectively protecting access to software and/or providing negative incentives for the unauthorized use of software? (NYT article, registration required)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9356</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2001 07:19:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arrest</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>DefCon</category>
		<category>DMCA</category>
		<category>DmitrySklyarov</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>LawrenceLessig</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<dc:creator>estopped</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7383/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/02/national/02LAB.html"&gt;question your science professional&lt;/a&gt; MD, PhD, specialist. I&apos;ve always thought you should seriously question their input on all their advise but most ppl don&apos;t.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7383</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 22:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>experts</category>
		<category>forensics</category>
		<category>JoyceGilchrist</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>greyscale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


