<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with nytimes and sex</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/nytimes+sex</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'nytimes' and 'sex' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:22:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:22:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Susie Bright on Stalagim</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/64471/Susie%2DBright%2Don%2DStalagim</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&apos;http://susiebright.blogs.com/susie_brights_journal_/2007/09/debbie-nathan-w.html&apos;&gt;Susie Bright&lt;/a&gt; comments on the recent &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/world/middleeast/06stalags.html?ex=1346817600&amp;en=b8c106c737bec67c&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink&apos;&gt;NYT piece&lt;/a&gt; about Israeli Nazi-themed porn. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&apos;http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/IsraelII.html&apos;&gt;Andrea Dworkin&lt;/a&gt; wrote about this genre almost 20 years ago. There&apos;s a new &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&amp;Board=news_history&amp;Number=295692765&amp;view=collapsed&amp;sb=5&amp;o=21&amp;part=&apos;&gt;film&lt;/a&gt; on the topic, which is what inspired the NY Times article.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.64471</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:22:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>documentary</category>
		<category>feminist</category>
		<category>israel</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexuality</category>
		<category>susiebright</category>
		<dc:creator>serazin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stickam is for Porn!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63586/Stickam%2Dis%2Dfor%2DPorn</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/technology/11video.html?ex=1341806400&amp;amp;en=fb801cfddc87d9f4&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss"&gt;onoes! teenz on teh pr0n webs!&lt;/a&gt; It&apos;s been a year since I posted about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/53718/Cam-Whoring-20&quot;&gt;Stickam&lt;/a&gt;, and in that time, one would be na&amp;#0239;ve to think that a community of unmoderated videos broadcast live from the private and semi-anonymous bedrooms of the world would not result in &lt;a href=&quot;http://img.420chan.org/st/&quot;&gt;epic lulz&lt;/a&gt; (nsfw). To no one&apos;s surprise, disgruntled Stickam ex-VP Alex Becker says &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2007/07/11/ex_worker_says_teen_website_has_ties_to_big_porn_enterprise/&quot;&gt;Stickam shares office space, staff, and equipment with live pornographic video providers&lt;/a&gt; -- this via &lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/just-how-icky-is-stickam/&quot;&gt;NYT tech writer Brad Stone&lt;/a&gt;. Cue the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/11/stickam-would-you-let-you-children-use-a-service-owned-by-pornographers/&quot;&gt;&quot;think of&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9742500-7.html&quot;&gt;the CHILDRUNZ!&quot;&lt;/a&gt; moral &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_panic&quot;&gt;panic&lt;/a&gt;. But popular websites being related to or backed up by prurient interest are nothing new: Wikipeda predecessor &lt;a href=&quot;http://bomis.com&quot;&gt;Bomis&lt;/a&gt; was once accused of having &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/news/2829/bomis-denuded-erotic-content&quot;&gt;&quot;softore porn&quot; in its &quot;Babes&quot; section&lt;/a&gt;, and of course everyone knows &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.law.indiana.edu/fclj/pubs/v49/no1/johnson.html&quot;&gt;porn drives technology&lt;/a&gt;. What do you think the internet is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/48269/The-Internet-is-for-Porn&quot;&gt;for&lt;/a&gt;? But if you use Stickam and this bothers you, the burgeoning field of live embeddable Flash-based webcam video streaming is rife with alternatives: &lt;a href=&quot;http://ustream.tv&quot;&gt;uStream.tv&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://justin.tv&quot;&gt;Justin.tv&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogtv.com/&quot;&gt;BlogTV&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://mogulus.com/&quot;&gt;Mogulus&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://operator11.com/&quot;&gt;Operator11&lt;/a&gt;, just to name some -- but there&apos;ll be naked girls on those too. I guarantee it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63586</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:18:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alexbecker</category>
		<category>blogtv</category>
		<category>bradstone</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>flash</category>
		<category>forthelulz</category>
		<category>justin.tv</category>
		<category>mogulus</category>
		<category>moralpanic</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>operator11</category>
		<category>porn</category>
		<category>pornography</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>stickam</category>
		<category>streaming</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<category>ustream</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<category>webcam</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sexual Predators on the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50650/Sexual%2DPredators%2Don%2Dthe%2DInternet</link>
		<description> Sexual Predators on the Internet:

Today we heard testimony about sexual exploitation of children on the Internet &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/05/washington/05porn.html/partner/rssnyt&quot;&gt;during a Congressional hearing&lt;/a&gt;. 

Tonight a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12159118/&quot;&gt;Homeland Security official is held &lt;/a&gt;for soliciting for a child on Internet.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50650</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 21:04:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BrianDoyle</category>
		<category>childpornography</category>
		<category>Congree</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>JustinBerry</category>
		<category>kiddyporn</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>sexualpredators</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Prostitute? or Sex Slave?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30929/Prostitute%2Dor%2DSex%2DSlave</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/25/magazine/25SEXTRAFFIC.html?pagewanted=1"&gt;The Making of a Sex Slave&lt;/a&gt; (NY Times; reg. req) The next time you seek comfort in the arms of a working girl, ask yourself if she&apos;s lying down with you because she likes the money or sex, of if she&apos;s doing it because she&apos;s been kidnapped, beaten, raped, taken to a foreign country where she doesn&apos;t speak the language, and told that the corrupt local police will murder a member of her family if she tries to escape.  Prostitution might be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/27859&quot;&gt;victimless crime&lt;/a&gt;, but the horrors described here certainly aren&apos;t; the problem is, how&apos;s a john with a conscience going to tell the difference?  A (much) longer report, terrifying in its thoroughness, on a topic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/30865&quot;&gt;lightly touched on&lt;/a&gt; here.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30929</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:33:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>prostitution</category>
		<category>rape</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>slavery</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<dc:creator>hhc5</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Christianity and a piece of rubber.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29856/Christianity%2Dand%2Da%2Dpiece%2Dof%2Drubber</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://nytimes.com/2003/11/26/opinion/26KRIS.html"&gt;The value of disobedience.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[note: nytimes]&lt;/small&gt; &quot;Ignoring the reactionary policies of the Vatican, some local priests and nuns quietly do what they can to save parishioners from AIDS.&quot; So: when and why do people choose to quietly disobey, rather than leave and promote change from outside their social institutions...or vice versa? Should dissenters just leave, or stay and fight? Anecdotes from Republicans and NRA members are especially welcome ;-)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29856</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:52:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AIDS</category>
		<category>Catholic</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>condoms</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>HIV</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>Vatican</category>
		<dc:creator>stonerose</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8832/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/06/arts/06BAIS.html"&gt;The movie censored in France opens in the US this week.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Base-Moi&lt;/i&gt; is being translated by the newspapers as &quot;Rape Me&quot; but a better translation would be &quot;Fuck Me,&quot; which better indicates that sexual power that the main female characters have. They use sex as a weapon, as the gateway firearm to murders and massacre. Violent, bloody, aggressively sexual, even pornographic, filled with &quot;chic amoralism,&quot; as the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; says, and perhaps difficult to redeem. Gratuitous everything.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8832</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 07:34:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BaiseMoi</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>France</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>Mo Nickels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8758/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/01/arts/01HOHE.html?0701inside"&gt;As the expression goes: &lt;i&gt;what one person finds sexy is vulgar to another&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; This piece form the NY Times (you&apos;ll need $#%$#% password!) explores films that contain explicit sex, but have merit beyond their sex appeal.  I think it&#8217;s refreshing that these directors are not afraid to unapologetically use sex as part of artistic filmmaking and interesting story telling.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8758</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2001 22:22:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>Bag Man</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8448/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/20/technology/19CND-ONLINE.html?todaysheadlines"&gt;Studies Show That Children Are Solicited Online&lt;/a&gt; (from the NY Times, free registration required) -- &quot;One in five children who regularly go online is approached by strangers for sex, according to a new study.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8448</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>newyorktimes</category>
		<category>nytimes</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>pedophilia</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>solicitation</category>
		<dc:creator>shauna</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4987/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/28/national/28SEX.html"&gt;Government gives money only to Sex Ed programs that teach not to have sex at all.&lt;/a&gt; Very disturbing article. Basically the teachers teach abstinence. No words about STDs or even contraception; or they&apos;ll lose their money.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4987</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2000 11:20:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abstinence</category>
		<category>AbstinenceOnly</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>schools</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>SexEd</category>
		<category>SexEducation</category>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


