<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with obesity and nutrition</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/obesity+nutrition</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'obesity' and 'nutrition' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:06:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:06:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>What?! No running in PE? It&#8217;s true.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/55353/What%2DNo%2Drunning%2Din%2DPE%2DIt%3Fs%2Dtrue</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://raisingsuccessfulchildren.com/feedingdreams/?p=5"&gt;No running in PE.&lt;/a&gt; I was talking to my kids about school the other day. We were discussing what they do in their different classes and the conversation came around to physical education (PE). I was shocked when they told me that their gym teacher forbids running in PE class. What?! No running in PE? It&#8217;s true.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.55353</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:06:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>exercise</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>physical_education</category>
		<dc:creator>John of Michigan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>MegaFeeders</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46725/MegaFeeders</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.csicop.org/si/2005-09/obesity.html"&gt;Obesity: Epidemic or Myth?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46725</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:43:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>eating</category>
		<category>food</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>life</category>
		<category>mortality</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>weight</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>NutritionData.com</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38759/NutritionDatacom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nutritiondata.com/index.html"&gt;NutritionData.com&lt;/a&gt; is a free and very useful website for detailed nutrition information, including the in-vogue &lt;a href=http://www.nutritiondata.com/glycemic-index.html&gt;Glycemic Index&lt;/a&gt;; their own  &lt;a href=http://www.nutritiondata.com/fullness-factor.html&gt;Fullness Factor&lt;/a&gt;, a measure of how filling foods are per calorie; and &lt;a href=http://www.nutritiondata.com/analysis-help.html&gt;others&lt;/a&gt;.  Their &lt;a href=http://www.nutritiondata.com/better-choices-diet.html&gt;Better Choices Diet&lt;/a&gt; makes use of the Fullness Factor to make &lt;a href=http://www.nutritiondata.com/dieting-weight-loss.html&gt;consuming less energy than you use&lt;/a&gt; easier to do without going hungry.

Previously mentioned in response to &lt;a href=http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/5025&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; AskMe question.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38759</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:57:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>diet</category>
		<category>fullnessfactor</category>
		<category>glycemicindex</category>
		<category>glycemicload</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>weightloss</category>
		<dc:creator>callmejay</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>you&apos;re my butterfly, sugar baby</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25329/youre%2Dmy%2Dbutterfly%2Dsugar%2Dbaby</link>
		<description> Yesterday the World Health Organization launched a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.who.int/mediacentre/releases/2003/pr32/en/&quot; _new&gt;report on diet and nutrition&lt;/a&gt;, saying that sugar should be restricted to 10% of caloric intake. Predictably, the sugar industry (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sugar.org/newsroom/releases.html&quot; _new&gt;press releases&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/leaders/story/0,3604,942354,00.html&quot; _new&gt;threw fits&lt;/a&gt; and called on their cronies in Congress to cut off WHO funding. Apparently they&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,940287,00.html&quot; _new&gt;fighting and clawing&lt;/a&gt; even more than the tobacco industry in similar circusmtances, and WHO fears that lobbyists have more power with the Bush administration. The SA believes that inactivity, not our increased sugar consumption, is the primary cause of the obesity epidemic. Are we in for another few years of declarations of junk science and endless gov&apos;t investigations into what seems obvious, &lt;i&gt;a la&lt;/i&gt; most environmental and health concerns?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25329</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:03:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BigSugar</category>
		<category>carbohydrates</category>
		<category>diet</category>
		<category>fat</category>
		<category>lobby</category>
		<category>lobbyists</category>
		<category>nutrition</category>
		<category>obesity</category>
		<category>PublicHealth</category>
		<category>sugar</category>
		<category>tobacco</category>
		<category>WHO</category>
		<category>WorldHealthOrganization</category>
		<dc:creator>fotzepolitic</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


