<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with obstruction</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/obstruction</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'obstruction' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:43:45 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:43:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Obstructacular.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63112/Obstructacular</link>
		<description> &quot;If this pace of blocking legislation continues, this 110th Congress will be on track to roughly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/18218.html&quot;&gt;triple the previous record&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.  Ah, for the halcyon days of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005&quot;&gt;yore&lt;/a&gt;, when obstuctionism was so obviously unconstitutional that it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/legislative_issues/federal_issues/hot_issues_in_congress/confirmation_watch/nuclear_option.htm&quot;&gt;required a nuclear response&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63112</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:43:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>filibuster</category>
		<category>hypocrisy</category>
		<category>nuclearoption</category>
		<category>obstruction</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>republican</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<dc:creator>Flunkie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15580/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/agenda/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=1043706"&gt;Farewell Arthur Andersen&lt;/a&gt;  - I guess having one &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.enron.com/corp/&quot;&gt;corporate basket case&lt;/a&gt; is a misfortune but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globalcrossing.com/xml/index.xml&quot;&gt;two&lt;/a&gt; starts to look like carelessness.   With tens of thousands of employees and pensions holders across the world, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30050-2002Mar14.html&quot;&gt;it&apos;s a disaster&lt;/a&gt;, for staff, pension holders and clients.  Is this tough treatment &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,47979,00.html#top&quot;&gt;&quot;a gross abuse of government power&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; or a fitting reward for crooked practice?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15580</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2002 06:34:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>accountants</category>
		<category>accounting</category>
		<category>ArthurAndersen</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Enron</category>
		<category>indictment</category>
		<category>obstruction</category>
		<category>scandal</category>
		<dc:creator>grahamwell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


