<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with oconnor</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/oconnor</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'oconnor' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:49:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:49:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Our Courts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80195/Our%2DCourts</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ourcourts.org/"&gt;Justice Sandra Day O&apos;Connor&lt;/a&gt; has a web site, about constitutional rights. Sometime this summer they&apos;re going to roll out &lt;a href=&quot;http://ourcourts.org/play-games&quot;&gt;two games&lt;/a&gt; for students to play to teach them about their rights under the Constitution.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80195</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:49:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>OConnor</category>
		<category>OurCourts</category>
		<dc:creator>Chocolate Pickle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10949/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/29/national/29SCOT.html"&gt;Justice O&apos;Connor foresees cutbacks in personal liberties.&lt;/a&gt; Sandra Day O&apos;Connor, during remarks given at the groundbreaking ceremonies for a Law School Building at NYU, cautions Americans that we may face restrictions in our personal freedoms.  No real specifics in the remarks, but intriguing in that she would be among those having the final say as to the constitutionality of any laws that arise out of the &quot;War on Terrorism&quot;.  She poses some interesting questions in her remarks.  And she is considered to be one of the moderate Justices.

    </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10949</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2001 08:19:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>america</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>freedoms</category>
		<category>liberty</category>
		<category>oconnor</category>
		<category>sandradayoconnor</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>MAYORBOB</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8510/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010621/aponline210247_000.htm"&gt;Carroll O&apos;Connor &lt;/a&gt;  dead at 76.  Once asked what he thought of his character &quot;Archie&quot; he had an interesting response : &quot;I have a great deal of sympathy for him, As James Baldwin wrote, the white man here is trapped by his own history, a history that he himself cannot comprehend and therefore what can I do but love him?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8510</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:01:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Archie</category>
		<category>CarrollOConnor</category>
		<category>Dead</category>
		<category>JamesBaldwin</category>
		<category>Obit</category>
		<category>OConnor</category>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4816/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://channel.nytimes.com/2000/12/14/politics/14THOM.html"&gt;For Comment: &quot;Does personality override politics in the Rehnquist Supreme Court?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; File under: &quot;What is the rhetorical and effective nature of constitutional interpretation and judicial review?&quot; I have always been intrigued by the ways in which the justices of the Supreme Court selectively reveal tidbits about their personality and the nature of their interactions. &quot;Scalia and Ginsburg are polar opposites, but are secretly best friends!&quot; &quot;O&apos;Connor likes Georgia O&apos;Keefe, and has several originals in her office!&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

While much of this can be explained by the media creating a story where there is none, the above comments by Thomas lead me to wonder that, if &apos;opinion&apos; is the form by which laws are reviewed, then perhaps &apos;individuality,&apos; &apos;style,&apos; or &apos;personality&apos; have an impact on how the concept of justice and constitutionality are applied.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4816</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:56:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ginsberg</category>
		<category>judiciary</category>
		<category>justices</category>
		<category>oconnor</category>
		<category>okeefe</category>
		<category>scalia</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


