<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with olpcnews</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/olpcnews</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'olpcnews' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:43:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:43:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Et tu, Intel? Then fall, OLPC.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68114/Et%2Dtu%2DIntel%2DThen%2Dfall%2DOLPC</link>
		<description> Wondering why OLPCNews.com &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.olpcnews.com/sales_talk/intel/is_nicholas_negroponte_mad.html&quot;&gt;disparages&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laptop.org/&quot;&gt;OLPC project&lt;/a&gt; so much? Curious as to the site&apos;s apparent emphasis on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.olpcnews.com/software/operating_system/windows_to_the_end_of_sugar.html&quot;&gt;bad news&lt;/a&gt; about the project? It could just be a coincidence. Or it could be because OLPCNews.com&apos;s chief contributor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wayan.com/&quot;&gt;Wayan Vota&lt;/a&gt; works on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geekcorps.org/&quot;&gt;project&lt;/a&gt; that&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geekcorps.org/partners/&quot;&gt;partnered with Intel&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Desktops-and-Notebooks/OLPC-Intel-Contributed-Little-to-the-Project/&quot;&gt;former OLPC partner&lt;/a&gt; turned competitor. Does Intel&apos;s back-stabbing extend beyond &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/0,1000000091,39291975,00.htm&quot;&gt;pre-sales&lt;/a&gt; and into public relations? The efficacy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/15547/GiveWell-or-Give-em-Hell&quot;&gt;GiveWell-style astro-turfing&lt;/a&gt; depends on not getting caught. But it&apos;s not clear the damage from a stealth smear campaign can be undone even after the perpetrator is exposed. Just what &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the opposite of &quot;astro-turfing,&quot; anyway? And why is a simple tech philanthropy project beset by so much drama? As OLPC insider &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=252&quot;&gt;Christopher Blizzard said&lt;/a&gt; before Christmas, this probably isn&apos;t a conspiracy, but it certainly smells funny. &lt;small&gt;Yes, this is my first post in the Blue, but I&apos;d appreciate any and all criticism of this effort.&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68114</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:43:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astroturfing</category>
		<category>intel</category>
		<category>negroponte</category>
		<category>olpc</category>
		<category>olpcnews</category>
		<category>olpcnewsnews</category>
		<dc:creator>sdodd</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


