<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with online and community</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/online+community</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'online' and 'community' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:11:04 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:11:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>&quot;...for the scientific community, the most critical organ of the incentive system is the cycle of credit.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/84759/for%2Dthe%2Dscientific%2Dcommunity%2Dthe%2Dmost%2Dcritical%2Dorgan%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dincentive%2Dsystem%2Dis%2Dthe%2Dcycle%2Dof%2Dcredit</link>
		<description> Just how credible is &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Credibility&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;? While some have tested this &lt;a href=&quot;http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1413/1331&quot;&gt;empirically&lt;/a&gt;, others have chosen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frozennorth.org/C2011481421/E652809545/index.html&quot;&gt;more dubious methodology&lt;/a&gt;. For a site that gives no credit to its post authors, one wonders, &lt;a href=&quot;http://66.102.1.104/scholar?q=cache:yyiyaKSiQfYJ:scholar.google.com/&amp;hl=en&quot;&gt;why even bother?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.84759</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:11:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>communities</category>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>credibility</category>
		<category>credit</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>incentive</category>
		<category>meta</category>
		<category>methodology</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>study</category>
		<category>wiki</category>
		<category>wikipedia</category>
		<dc:creator>iamkimiam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Before everything, there was PLATO</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/81204/Before%2Deverything%2Dthere%2Dwas%2DPLATO</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science.uva.nl/museum/PLATO.html&quot;&gt;Touch screen&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.platopeople.com/about.html&quot;&gt;Awesome graphics.&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkofit.com/plato/dwplato.htm&quot;&gt;Online community.&lt;/a&gt;  No, I&apos;m not talking about the latest handheld device to hit the market, I&apos;m talking about Control Data&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/09/07/control-data-plato-computer-system/&quot;&gt;PLATO&lt;/a&gt; system. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.platopeople.com/index.html&quot;&gt;PLATO People.&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cyber1.org/&quot;&gt;Preservation efforts.&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.daleske.com/plato/empire.php&quot;&gt;Empire.&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.81204</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:29:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>awesome</category>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>computer</category>
		<category>controldata</category>
		<category>empire</category>
		<category>games</category>
		<category>HAL</category>
		<category>instruction</category>
		<category>learning</category>
		<category>lotusnotes</category>
		<category>netrek</category>
		<category>networking</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>plato</category>
		<category>retro</category>
		<category>videogames</category>
		<dc:creator>WolfDaddy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Collective (with a wierd asterisk)</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22829/Collective%2Dwith%2Da%2Dwierd%2Dasterisk</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/collective/"&gt;Collective*&lt;/a&gt; is the BBC&apos;s attempt to build an online community (or have a go at a simpler version of h2g2).  Actually seems like an online version of The Guardian&apos;s &apos;The Guide&apos; (mini what&apos;s on section which appears every Saturday).  Overall it does feel a bit too processed.  Should these things be so structured, or is it better that they develop naturally?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22829</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:34:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BBC</category>
		<category>Collective</category>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9587/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2001JulSep/0699.html"&gt;In defense of flamewars&lt;/a&gt; Bravest thing I&#8217;ve read all year. &#8216;Rules against &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; flaming favor politicians and passive-aggressives. These people are experts at sticking the knife in subtly. When the victim yells out in pain, the politician/passive-aggressive feigns innocence and claims he/she is the victim and the true victim is the aggressor.... &amp;#182; Rules against all flaming discriminate against those whose communication skills are less developed. A brilliant writer can pillory an opponent without seeming to. A less-skilled victim of such an assault knows that he/she is being attacked, but can&amp;#8217;t muster the same subtlety in response.... &amp;#182;&amp;#160;The worst thing you can do is to post something like &amp;#8220;Please take your flames off list&amp;#8221;... People flame on list because they feel that their reputations have been sullied publicly. Telling them to take it off list is just like telling them to shut up and take it&amp;#8217;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9587</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 06:38:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>flamewars</category>
		<category>guidelines</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6566/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/globe/magazine/3-25/currents.shtml"&gt;&quot;Ah, the vibrant interaction of electronic conversation. Isn&apos;t it beautiful? In a word: No.&quot; &lt;/a&gt; A pessimistic take on &quot;community.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6566</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:57:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>weblogs</category>
		<dc:creator>maura</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4319/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.contenu.nu/nublog.html#communiblogger"&gt;Blogger is the answer.&lt;/a&gt;   Portals suck.  &quot;Community sites&quot; suck.  The always-excellent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.contenu.nu/nublog.html&quot;&gt;NUblog&lt;/a&gt; crew think Pyra has the answer -- communities of Bloggers focused on specific subject areas.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4319</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:59:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>community</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>portals</category>
		<category>pyra</category>
		<category>weblogs</category>
		<dc:creator>lbergstr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


