<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with oped and georgewbush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/oped+georgewbush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'oped' and 'georgewbush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:06:35 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:06:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A Bush win and its likely consequensces.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35579/A%2DBush%2Dwin%2Dand%2Dits%2Dlikely%2Dconsequensces</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0409.bushforum.html"&gt;What If Bush Wins?&lt;/a&gt; Sixteen writers ,right and left,  predict the likely consequences of a second term for President Bush.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35579</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 23:06:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>election2004</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>pundits</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Idiot Prince will have his war</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24391/The%2DIdiot%2DPrince%2Dwill%2Dhave%2Dhis%2Dwar</link>
		<description> Stan Goff puts it best in his anti-war article entitled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/031703_rolling_start.html&quot;&gt;The Idiot Prince will have his war&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, outlining many of the logistical issues involved with waging war in Iraq, pointing a finger at a problem facing the United States that runs far deeper than the need for oil or the opposition of the United Nations.

A fascinating and very chilling read.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24391</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 23:31:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>FromTheWilderness</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>OpEd</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>PWA_BadBoy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20932/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/10/18/iraq.usa.actor.reut/"&gt;Sean Penn totally disses President Bush in the Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; but because he did it in a full page ad and not an op/ed column it is totally unlinkable to those of use on the web, and therefore dies on the vine.

Two questions: How can one find the full transcript to Penn&apos;s advertisment, and why is it that only Republican movie stars are allowed have their voices heard in political discussions?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20932</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:30:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ad</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWBush</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<category>SeanPenn</category>
		<dc:creator>tsarfan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19634/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/01/opinion/01BRZE.html"&gt;&quot;Any further strikes against Americans will thus be a painful reminder that the war has not been won.&lt;/a&gt; Sadly, a main reason will be America&apos;s reluctance to focus on the political roots of the terrorist atrocity of Sept. 11.&quot;

opinions on this piece from the original sponsor of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mujahideen.fsnet.co.uk/speech/bin-laden-10nov2001.htm&quot;&gt;Mujahideen&lt;/a&gt;?
username: metafilter46 password: metafilter

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19634</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:38:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>Brzezinski</category>
		<category>extremism</category>
		<category>geopolitics</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWOT</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>OpEd</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>ZbigniewBrzezinski</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6924/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,248-112300,00.html"&gt;Bush is no idiot&lt;/a&gt; - or so claims this opinion piece from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thetimes.co.uk/&quot;&gt;The London Times&lt;/a&gt;. &quot;What a pity that President Bush&#8217;s critics haven&#8217;t learnt to leave the playground, and its insults, behind.&quot; What Bush has done is &quot;show that a conservative isn&#8217;t just a leftwinger with better table manners but an honest defender of superior principles.&quot;
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6924</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2001 05:57:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<dc:creator>revbrian</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4357/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.observer.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,399690,00.html"&gt;&quot;The rules of this game were set by the people, underwritten by the people, financed or not.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Yet another opportunity for the British &lt;i&gt;Observer&lt;/i&gt; to put the US newspapers to shame, with an closely-argued, even-handed reflection on the fun in Florida. &quot;The system, full of inefficiencies and coagulations, may stink, but it is also a system which belongs to the voters who now complain so shrilly about it.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4357</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2000 01:01:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>ballots</category>
		<category>Britain</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>democracy</category>
		<category>Election2000</category>
		<category>fairness</category>
		<category>Florida</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>MarginOfError</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<category>TheGuardian</category>
		<category>TheObserver</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<category>USPresident</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


