<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with opensource and microsoft</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/opensource+microsoft</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'opensource' and 'microsoft' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:53:09 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:53:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Je me souviens ... l&apos;accord de partage de l&apos;utilisateur</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74463/Je%2Dme%2Dsouviens%2Dlaccord%2Dde%2Dpartage%2Dde%2Dlutilisateur</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://facil.qc.ca/en&quot;&gt;Facil&lt;/a&gt;, an open-source community based in Qu&amp;#0233;bec, is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/08/27/tech-quebec.html&quot;&gt;suing the Qu&amp;#0233;bec government for buying Microsoft software&lt;/a&gt; when free alternatives are available. Facil&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://facil.qc.ca/en/media/20080828-facil-contests-the-quebec-government-purchasing-methods-for-software&quot;&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt; says, in part, &quot;From February to June 2008, FACIL has noticed sales of proprietary software for more than 25 million dollars. These purchases were made for products offered by large multinational enterprises, with no regard to suppliers in Quebec. ... While most of the developed countries have started, a few years back, migrating their technological infrastructures to Free Software, Quebec&apos;s public administration is far behind.&quot; Some &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.itworldcanada.com/insights/2008/08/28/facil-launches-lawsuit-against-quebec-government-to-close-loophole/&quot;&gt;applaud&lt;/a&gt; Facil&apos;s move. Others, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10027897-16.html&quot;&gt;not so much&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74463</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:53:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>facil</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>quebec</category>
		<dc:creator>Marisa Stole the Precious Thing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>All Your Kernals Are Belong to Us</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56366/All%2DYour%2DKernals%2DAre%2DBelong%2Dto%2DUs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9005171&amp;amp;intsrc=hm_list"&gt;Ballmer: Linux Users Owe Microsoft.&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer stated at the Professional Association for SQL Server (PASS) conference in Seattle yesterday, that Linux infringes upon his company&apos;s intellectual property.  Does this signal preparations for all out war against the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux&quot;&gt;open source community&lt;/a&gt;?   Microsoft&apos;s recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9005011&quot;&gt;acquisition of Novell&lt;/a&gt; was seen as an ominous sign.  Or perhaps it&apos;s a sign that user friendly versions of linux such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubuntu.com/&quot;&gt;Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt; threaten sales of Microsoft&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/03/24/76795_HNvistaprobsworse_1.html&quot;&gt;problematic&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=102&amp;threadID=203131&amp;messageID=2115517&quot;&gt;new&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/Study+No+Vista+for+majority+of+European+businesses/2100-1016_3-6135429.html&quot;&gt;VISTA&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT8288296398.html&quot;&gt;OS&lt;/a&gt;, scheduled for release Nov. 30th for businesses and Jan. 30, 2007 for consumers?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56366</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:00:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ballmer</category>
		<category>FUD</category>
		<category>IBM</category>
		<category>IntellectualProperty</category>
		<category>JawdroppingArrogance</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>Novell</category>
		<category>OpenSource</category>
		<category>patent</category>
		<category>SCO</category>
		<category>SUSE</category>
		<category>Ubuntu</category>
		<category>Vista</category>
		<dc:creator>Skygazer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Uncool: Chill, Bill. Technorati: Awake!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33945/Uncool%2DChill%2DBill%2DTechnorati%2DAwake</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/cgi-bin/blog/2004/06"&gt;Think tanks attack Open Source&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The Alexis de Tocqueville Institute&#8217;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adti.net/&quot;&gt;attack on Linux&lt;/a&gt; is just the latest in a series of attacks on Open Source by think tanks.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was able to detect a common theme to all their criticism. They all seem to be funded by Microsoft. &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33945</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:36:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>gpl</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>lobbying</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>thinktank</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>MS + SCO + Linux...oh my...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31566/MS%2DSCO%2DLinuxoh%2Dmy</link>
		<description> It comes as no surprise that Microsoft seems to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html&quot;&gt;paying&lt;/a&gt; SCO to fight the fight. &lt;small&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;irc://irc.freenode.net/joiito&quot;&gt;#joiito&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31566</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:43:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>BSD</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>SCO</category>
		<dc:creator>yonderboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The CEO of Ernie Ball talks about how his company left Microsoft for Linux after a licensing fiasco.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30137/The%2DCEO%2Dof%2DErnie%2DBall%2Dtalks%2Dabout%2Dhow%2Dhis%2Dcompany%2Dleft%2DMicrosoft%2Dfor%2DLinux%2Dafter%2Da%2Dlicensing%2Dfiasco</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2008-1082_3-5065859.html?tag=lh"&gt;The CEO of Ernie Ball talks about how his company left Microsoft for Linux after a licensing fiasco.&lt;/a&gt; Sterling Ball: It&apos;s just software. You have to figure out what you need to do within your organization and then get the right stuff for that. And we&apos;re not a backwards organization. We&apos;re progressive; we&apos;ve won communications and design awards...The fact that I&apos;m not sending my e-mail through Outlook doesn&apos;t hinder us. It&apos;s just kind of funny. I&apos;m speaking to a standing-room-only audience at a major technology show because I use a different piece of software--that&apos;s hysterical.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30137</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:55:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ernieball</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>redhat</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19781/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://paknews.com/top.php?id=1&amp;amp;date1=2002-09-06"&gt;Pakistan government may replace pirated Windows-based systems with Linux&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The Microsoft Corporation has already offered over 90 per cent discount to the government but we want to press for more cuts in prices.&quot; Is the Linux announcement a bargaining strategy or a serious sign? This June O&apos;Reilly story provides some context, noting a &lt;a href=&quot;http://linux.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2002/07/16/linux_in_govt.html&quot;&gt;sudden spiking popularity of open source software within the U.S. government&lt;/a&gt;, which &quot;actually lags behind other major governments&quot; who are &quot;gravitating toward open source software for a variety of reasons.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19781</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:46:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>pakistan</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>mediareport</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16838/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gnu.org.pe/resmseng.html"&gt;Peru goes GNU.&lt;/a&gt; And I quote: &lt;i&gt; &quot;You may have heard about this if you watch the free software news, but I just want to repeat it for anyone who hasn&apos;t.  The Peruvian government has introduced legislation requiring government offices to use free software; Microsoft is unhappy; and a member of the Peruvian Congress has written a response which I highly recommend reading, in which he explains in strong terms why it&apos;s out of the question for the government of a democratic nation to use proprietary software.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16838</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 11:43:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Congress</category>
		<category>FreeAsInBeer</category>
		<category>FreeAsInSpeech</category>
		<category>FreeSoftware</category>
		<category>GNU</category>
		<category>GPL</category>
		<category>Legislation</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>OpenSource</category>
		<category>Peru</category>
		<dc:creator>BGM</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11580/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/hosted?netname=MICROSOFT,131.107.0.0,131.107.255.255"&gt;What OS is Micro$oft running?&lt;/a&gt; A poll of what OS&apos; run in Microsoft&apos;s netblock, and their rank by uptime.  Besides the fact that Hotmail was on FreeBSD for awhile [before M$ took them over], this was surprising.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11580</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2001 21:09:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computer</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>tech</category>
		<dc:creator>plemeljr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8752/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010702/tc/ms_attacks_open_source_1.html"&gt;Microsoft bans use of Open Source&lt;/a&gt; with its wireless internet tools.  Will this be a huge PR blunder, or will people accept MS&apos; hardline stance against this so-called &quot;potentially viral&quot; software?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8752</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2001 13:49:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>ms</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>wifi</category>
		<category>wireless</category>
		<dc:creator>moz</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7444/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/03/technology/03SOFT.html"&gt;MS VP Challenges GPL on Moral Grounds In Speech&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Admitting that the company is feeling pressure from open source, free alternatives, Microsoft&apos;s Craig Mundie, lecturing at NYU, will speak out against G.P.L., which he considers impractical, dangerous and morally wrong. Stallman is quoted as saying something ludicrously funny about the American revolution.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7444</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2001 13:57:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>freeware</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>shareware</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<dc:creator>rschram</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


