<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with operative</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/operative</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'operative' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:34:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:34:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Payback?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27051/Payback</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&amp;amp;pid=823"&gt;Payback?&lt;/a&gt; How did Bush officials get back at Ambassador Joseph Wilson for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0706-02.htm&quot;&gt;talking publicly&lt;/a&gt; two weeks ago about his trip to Niger to investigate claims of an Iraqi uranium deal?  By &lt;a href=&quot;http://thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&amp;pid=823&quot;&gt;outing his wife as an undercover CIA operative&lt;/a&gt;.  As David Corn of The Nation says, &lt;i&gt;&quot;...the Bush administration has screwed one of its own top-secret operatives in order to punish Wilson or to send a message to others who might challenge it..... a pair of top Bush officials told a reporter the name of a CIA operative who apparently has worked under what&apos;s known as &apos;nonofficial cover&apos; and who has had the dicey and difficult mission of tracking parties trying to buy or sell weapons of mass destruction or WMD material. If Wilson&apos;s wife is such a person--and the CIA is unlikely to have many employees like her--her career has been destroyed by the Bush administration.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; The exposure of an undercover CIA agent is in fact a federal crime.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27051</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:34:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>bushadministration</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>dickcheney</category>
		<category>exposure</category>
		<category>josephwilson</category>
		<category>libby</category>
		<category>operative</category>
		<category>payback</category>
		<category>robertnovak</category>
		<category>scooterlibby</category>
		<category>undercover</category>
		<category>valerieplame</category>
		<dc:creator>Artifice_Eternity</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16199/</link>
		<description> David Brock&apos;s book &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0812930991/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Blinded by the Right&lt;/a&gt;&quot; chronicles the laundry list of illegality he took part in as a part of the conservative machine, smearing both Anita Hill and Bill Clinton during the 1990&apos;s. He claims &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/04/02/column.billpress/&quot;&gt;all the ridiculous things you&apos;ve heard about &quot;vast right-wing conspiracies&quot; were true&lt;/a&gt;, and that it&apos;s time the truth come out. Is this guy for real, or blowing smoke up our collective asses?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16199</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2002 22:17:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Amazon</category>
		<category>AmericanSpectator</category>
		<category>AnitaHill</category>
		<category>BillClinton</category>
		<category>BlindedByTheRight</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>Conspiracy</category>
		<category>DavidBrock</category>
		<category>operative</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>VastRightWingConspiracy</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


