<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with opinionpolls</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/opinionpolls</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'opinionpolls' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:11 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>New Poll: Public Would Significantly Alter Administration&apos;s Budget</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40281/New%2DPoll%2DPublic%2DWould%2DSignificantly%2DAlter%2DAdministrations%2DBudget</link>
		<description> A new poll finds that the American public would significantly alter the Bush administration&#8217;s recently proposed federal budget. Presented a breakdown of the major areas of the proposed discretionary budget and given the opportunity to redistribute it, respondents made major changes. The most dramatic changes were deep cuts in defense spending, a significant reallocation toward deficit reduction, and increases in spending on education, job training, reducing reliance on oil, and veterans. These changes were favored by both Republicans and Democrats, though the changes were generally greater for Democrats.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/budget/030705/html/more_03_07_05.html#1&quot; title=&quot;The American public as a whole takes a fairly coherent position. They favor redirecting a portion of defense spending to deficit reduction and social spending and look for savings by cutting spending on large-scale Cold War style capabilities--not unlike Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld&#8212;and sizing capabilities on the assumption that the US will be acting together with allies, not on its own.&quot;&gt;What America Gets  Right&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/budget/030705/Report03_07_05.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;) via &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gadflyer.com/flytrap/index.php?Week=200510#1584&quot;&gt;The Gadflyer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40281</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>budgets</category>
		<category>opinionpolls</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>publicopinion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USbudget</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bush vs. Kerry: Dead Heat or Blowout?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34518/Bush%2Dvs%2DKerry%2DDead%2DHeat%2Dor%2DBlowout</link>
		<description> According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/bush_vs_kerry_hth.html&quot;&gt;multiple recent nationwide polls&lt;/a&gt;, the
presidential race is a dead heat, with the spread
within the margin of error.  Some have Bush by a
couple points, some say Kerry by a couple.  But take a look at the way the race is represented by
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoral-vote.com/jul/jul00.html&quot;&gt;www.electoral-vote.com&lt;/a&gt;, which tracks polls state-by-state and
takes electoral votes into account.  Suddenly, the tally is Kerry 332, Bush 195.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34518</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 01:00:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>kerry</category>
		<category>opinionpolls</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<dc:creator>msacheson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


