<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with os and linux</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/os+linux</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'os' and 'linux' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:09:41 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:09:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Wubi: Ubuntu the easy way</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68368/Wubi%2DUbuntu%2Dthe%2Deasy%2Dway</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubuntu.com/&quot;&gt;Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt; has quickly become the number one &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution&quot;&gt;Linux distro&lt;/a&gt; for the desktop. Not only is it free, but it has also made Linux easier to use than ever. Now, &lt;a href=&quot;http://wubi-installer.org/&quot;&gt;Wubi&lt;/a&gt; enables &lt;strong&gt;Windows users&lt;/strong&gt; to install Ubuntu just like any other application, so you no longer have to mess around with partitions, burning CDs, etc. Be advised that Wubi is just an installer, i.e. it still has to download Ubuntu, ca 700 MB in size,  from the web.  The software is still beta.

Interesting info from &lt;a href=&quot;http://wubi-installer.org/faq.php&quot;&gt;the Wubi FAQ&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;What are the system requirements?&lt;/strong&gt;
256 MB RAM and an 1 GHz or faster Intel/AMD processor is recommended for optimal performance, though Xubuntu might work on less. As for disk space, the installation requires a minimum of 4GB. This space is mostly used by the virtual hard disk file. Most computers purchased within the last 3 years should be able to run Ubuntu fine, and Xubuntu is suitable for older computers.


&lt;strong&gt;What platforms are supported?&lt;/strong&gt;
Wubi will run on on all Windows versions from Windows 98 to Windows Vista, more platforms to come soon. 64-bit builds are possible but not yet available. Linux/*nix/*BSD are supported through Lubi (download location and guide), and Mac OSX will eventually be supported through Mubi (developers still needed).


&lt;strong&gt;How does Wubi work?&lt;/strong&gt;
Wubi adds an entry to the Windows boot menu which allows you to run Linux. Ubuntu is installed within a file in the windows file system (c:\wubi\disks\system.virtual.disk), this file is seen by Linux as a real hard disk.


&lt;strong&gt;Is this running Ubuntu within a virtual environment or something similar?&lt;/strong&gt;
No. This is a real installation, the only difference is that Ubuntu is installed within a file as opposed to being installed within its own partition. Thus we spare you the trouble to create a free partition for Ubuntu. And we spare you the trouble to have to burn a CD-Rom.


&lt;strong&gt;What flavor of Ubuntu will I get?&lt;/strong&gt;
Most flavors, including Ubuntu (default, with GNOME), Kubuntu (with KDE), Xubuntu (with XFCE for older computers), Edubuntu (good for schools and younger users) and UbuntuStudio (for multimedia workstations). Contact us if you would like your own flavor to be available for installation via Wubi.


&lt;strong&gt;How do I run Ubuntu?&lt;/strong&gt;
You have to reboot and choose &quot;Ubuntu&quot;.


&lt;strong&gt;How do I run Windows?&lt;/strong&gt;
You have to reboot and choose &quot;Windows&quot;.


&lt;strong&gt;How do I uninstall it?&lt;/strong&gt;
You uninstall it as any other applications. In windows go to the control panel and select &quot;Add or Remove Programs&quot;, then select Wubi and uninstall it. You can also use the uninstaller that you find in C:\wubi\uninstaller.exe.
&lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68368</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:09:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>applications</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>distro</category>
		<category>foss</category>
		<category>freesoftware</category>
		<category>it</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>operatingsystem</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>ubuntu</category>
		<category>wubi</category>
		<dc:creator>Foci for Analysis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Whizzkid develops Linux application for Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32418/Whizzkid%2Ddevelops%2DLinux%2Dapplication%2Dfor%2DWindows</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/414290.html"&gt;Whizzkid develops Linux application for Windows&lt;/a&gt; [...]The significance of the development is that Linux and Windows are able to work in parallel on the same computer or server. To[sic] now, the computer world is divided into systems that operate either with Windows or with Linux. [...]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32418</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:42:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>application</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>cooperative</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>Microsoft</category>
		<category>operatingsystem</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>Windows</category>
		<dc:creator>Postroad</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>SCO wants GPL declared unconstitutional.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29304/SCO%2Dwants%2DGPL%2Ddeclared%2Dunconstitutional</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,520034525,00.html"&gt;SCO is at it again&lt;/a&gt; ... this time they&apos;ve asked a federal judge to declare that Linux&apos;s general public license &amp;mdash; a backbone of the free software movement &amp;mdash; unconstitutional.

Let&apos;s hope the judge has more sense than SCO.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29304</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:48:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>gpl</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>litigation</category>
		<category>operatingsystem</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>sco</category>
		<dc:creator>silusGROK</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A columnist resigns</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28995/A%2Dcolumnist%2Dresigns</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blosxom.cgi/2003/Oct/12#parting"&gt;Why was I still writing for these clowns?&lt;/a&gt; Charlie Stross wrote the Linux column in UK magazine &apos;Computer Shopper&apos; for over sixty months, until a regime change started to impinge on his editorial freedom.  The last straw came when he submitted a column regarding weblogging tools for the Linux platform only for it to be bounced because the tools weren&apos;t actually part of the operating system ... so he produced this column for himself and emailed his resignation.  Part of his decision was based on declining quality and sales.  Does anyone still actively buy computer magazines anymore? [thanks &lt;a href=&quot;http://soreeyes.org/&quot;&gt;Sore Eyes&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28995</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:47:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CharlieStross</category>
		<category>ComputerShopper</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>magazine</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>tools</category>
		<category>weblogging</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15238/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/03/01/1555254&amp;amp;mode=thread"&gt;What Linux Really Needs:&lt;/a&gt; Non profit, public service announcements by a foundation formed expressly for that purpose.  Whether you keep up with the OS fray or not, what a neat idea really.  &lt;font size=1&gt;Trolls:  Slashdot is burning!  You&apos;re needed over there.&lt;/font&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15238</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2002 23:00:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>OpEd</category>
		<category>OpenSource</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>platform</category>
		<dc:creator>crasspastor</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14417/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://radioqualia.va.com.au/freeradiolinux/"&gt;Free Radio Linux&lt;/a&gt; is about to go online, reading the entire Linux kernel over the internet using the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/index.html&quot;&gt;Ogg Vorbis&lt;/a&gt; codec.  Free as in beer.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14417</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2002 04:42:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>FreeRadioLinux</category>
		<category>kernel</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>SpokenWord</category>
		<dc:creator>j.edwards</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7723/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-202-5939697.html"&gt;Can Linux be anything more &lt;/a&gt;  than a Server/Developer OS without something like Eazel?  Will the open-source community be able to do anything productive with its &lt;a href=&quot;http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2001-May/msg00203.html&quot;&gt;code&lt;/a&gt;?  Or have we just reached a point where the OS is superfluous?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7723</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2001 06:57:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>easel</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>Nautilus</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>venturecapital</category>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6945/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.itworld.com/Comp/2384/LWD010410maccomments/"&gt;Linus doesn&apos;t hate Mac OS X after all.&lt;/a&gt; Contrary to what you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/6830&quot;&gt;may have heard&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/torvalds/&quot;&gt;Linus Torvalds&lt;/a&gt; has said in an interview with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itworld.com/Comp/2384/LinuxWorld/&quot;&gt;LinuxWorld&lt;/a&gt; that he actually has nothing against Mac OS X--as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/6830#66306&quot;&gt;some people here suspected&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.news.yahoo.com/010406/152/bir12.html&quot;&gt;original article&lt;/a&gt; seems to have been more aimed at creating controversy than at conveying information.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6945</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2001 19:03:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>linustorvalds</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>mac</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<dc:creator>moss</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4820/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/home.html"&gt;Codeweavers, Windows software on Linux.&lt;/a&gt; I think the average consumer might be very interested in Linux, if they could run their current Windows programs on it. Another step closer to the end of Bill Gates&apos; evil rule.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4820</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:20:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>codeweavers</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<dc:creator>Zool</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2563/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www-4.ibm.com/software/is/mp/linux/audio/ibm_linux-02.avi"&gt;IBM&apos;s Linux commercial.&lt;/a&gt; Part of their Avery Brooks &quot;serious software&quot; ad campaign, which I like a lot, I have to say.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2563</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2000 14:41:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>commercials</category>
		<category>ibm</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>dan_of_brainlog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1443/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.lwn.net/daily/rh-piranha.html"&gt;RedHat Linux security problem uncovered.&lt;/a&gt; Today, apparently it was discovered that if you install the Piranha package with RedHat 6.2 (ostensibly part of the default installation, but there&apos;s controversy over this), a default password is installed that would give anyone access to the Piranha configuration package; from there, it is apparently trivial to execute any command on the box that you want.&lt;br&gt;
I find it very interesting that the fact that Microsoft had a &quot;backdoor password&quot; in a DLL made &lt;b&gt;huge&lt;/b&gt; news (and it turned out to be patently false), yet this has gotten almost &lt;b&gt;no&lt;/b&gt; press.  I&apos;d like to think otherwise, but I know it&apos;s because people hate Microsoft, and thus are eager to deride it... and yet here&apos;s proof that even the mighty Linux is susceptible to the same exact problems.&lt;br&gt;
Next time you reach for the keyboard to cry out &quot;nyah nyah!&quot; at the discovery of some problem with Windows, remember this...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1443</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2000 21:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>Linux</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>Pirahna</category>
		<category>RedHat</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<dc:creator>delfuego</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/593/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.herring.com/insider/2000/0127/news-sunupdate012700.html"&gt;Now that Sun&apos;s Solaris 8 OS is going to be free,&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.be.com/products/freebeos/&quot;&gt;the BeOS too&lt;/a&gt;, I wonder if it&apos;s too little, too late. Will we see jumps in their respective shares of the OS market? Or is this a last ditch attempt to compete with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linux.com/&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.593</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2000 02:24:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BeOS</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>solaris</category>
		<category>solaris8</category>
		<category>Sun</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


