<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with os and operatingsystems</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/os+operatingsystems</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'os' and 'operatingsystems' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2002 06:46:45 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2002 06:46:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17654/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/25608.html"&gt;Ancient OS may be the best weapon against hackers.&lt;/a&gt; I thought this was great, aging Operating Systems such as Solaris and older versions of Mac Os are becoming valuable tools against electronic attacks, simply because they *are* older. (Anyone got the full set of floppies for System 7?)

&lt;small&gt;Link from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.robotwisdom.com&quot;&gt; RobotWisdom &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17654</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2002 06:46:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hackers</category>
		<category>mac</category>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>solaris</category>
		<dc:creator>jeremias</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7550/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/desktop/ws_features.html"&gt;VMware.&lt;/a&gt; Run the Operating Systems You Need, All at Once, on the One Machine. 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7550</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2001 16:58:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>vmware</category>
		<dc:creator>Zool</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6909/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.scripting.com/specials/gatesLetter/text.html"&gt;Bill Gates created MacOS X?&lt;/a&gt; I came across this memo written by Bill Gates on July 29, 1985 to John Sculley, then president of Apple Computer. In the memo, Gates writes about the possibility of licensing the Macintosh operating system to third party companies. Here&apos;s where it get wierd, Bill suggests that Apple talk to AT&amp;T about migrating the MacOS as a GUI layer on top of their UNIX. Makes me wonder who had the idea first, Steve Jobs or Bill Gates?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6909</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:24:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apple</category>
		<category>billgates</category>
		<category>johnsculley</category>
		<category>macos</category>
		<category>macosx</category>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>osx</category>
		<category>stevejobs</category>
		<dc:creator>Brilliantcrank</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4820/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.codeweavers.com/home.html"&gt;Codeweavers, Windows software on Linux.&lt;/a&gt; I think the average consumer might be very interested in Linux, if they could run their current Windows programs on it. Another step closer to the end of Bill Gates&apos; evil rule.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4820</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:20:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>codeweavers</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>windows</category>
		<dc:creator>Zool</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2563/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www-4.ibm.com/software/is/mp/linux/audio/ibm_linux-02.avi"&gt;IBM&apos;s Linux commercial.&lt;/a&gt; Part of their Avery Brooks &quot;serious software&quot; ad campaign, which I like a lot, I have to say.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2563</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2000 14:41:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>commercials</category>
		<category>ibm</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>os</category>
		<category>software</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>dan_of_brainlog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/593/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.herring.com/insider/2000/0127/news-sunupdate012700.html"&gt;Now that Sun&apos;s Solaris 8 OS is going to be free,&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.be.com/products/freebeos/&quot;&gt;the BeOS too&lt;/a&gt;, I wonder if it&apos;s too little, too late. Will we see jumps in their respective shares of the OS market? Or is this a last ditch attempt to compete with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linux.com/&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.593</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2000 02:24:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BeOS</category>
		<category>linux</category>
		<category>opensource</category>
		<category>operatingsystems</category>
		<category>OS</category>
		<category>solaris</category>
		<category>solaris8</category>
		<category>Sun</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


