<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with oscars</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/oscars</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'oscars' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:37:37 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:37:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Preceded by silence... followed by more silence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79448/Preceded%2Dby%2Dsilence%2Dfollowed%2Dby%2Dmore%2Dsilence</link>
		<description> When &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.variety.com/profiles/people/main/58675/Resul%20Pookutty.html?dataSet=1#Main&quot;&gt;Resul&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Tough-journey-for-sound-wizard-Resul-Pookutty/articleshow/4179878.cms&quot;&gt;Pookutty &lt;/a&gt;won the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Sound&quot;&gt;Oscar for Sound Mixing&lt;/a&gt; last weekend, it&apos;s probably the first time &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RVm2KXCJt8&quot;&gt;an Oscar acceptance speech&lt;/a&gt;, or really any U.S. network television broadcast, has mentioned the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.traditionalyogastudies.com/articles_scholarly_om.html&quot;&gt;primordial&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Om&quot;&gt;syllable&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/51593133@N00/679380823/&quot;&gt;Om&lt;/a&gt;, which is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.articlealley.com/article_130173_34.html&quot;&gt;very important&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.religionfacts.com/hinduism/symbols/aum.htm&quot;&gt;Hindus&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scribd.com/doc/2058091/Om-Jain&quot;&gt;Jains&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buddhanet.net/e-learning/history/bud_om.htm&quot;&gt;Buddhists&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79448</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:37:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>india</category>
		<category>mixing</category>
		<category>om</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>resulpookutty</category>
		<category>silence</category>
		<category>sound</category>
		<dc:creator>aught</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Colbert predicts the Oscars</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79412/Colbert%2Dpredicts%2Dthe%2DOscars</link>
		<description> Once again, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/218733/february-12-2009/the-dacolbert-code---oscar-predictions&quot;&gt;Stephen Colbert predicted the winners in all of major Academy Award categories&lt;/a&gt; ten days in advance, using an unconventional methodology.  &lt;small&gt;Well kinda... there was one category where he waffled.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79412</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:14:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academy</category>
		<category>awards</category>
		<category>colbert</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>twoleftfeet</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Silver&apos;s Picks for the Silver Screen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79314/Silvers%2DPicks%2Dfor%2Dthe%2DSilver%2DScreen</link>
		<description> He predicted a &lt;a href=&quot;http://baseballevolution.com/keith/wspecota.html&quot;&gt;losing season for the White Sox in 2007&lt;/a&gt; and foresaw that &lt;a href=&quot;http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/baseball/mlb/02/26/leap.year0303/&quot;&gt;the Tampa Bay Rays would be the best team in the American League in 2008&lt;/a&gt;, although he wrongly predicted that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bugsandcranks.com/tampa-bay-devil-rays/david-chalk/nate-silver-905-chance-devil-rays-win-it-all/&quot;&gt;the Rays would win the World Series&lt;/a&gt;.  He also predicted &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/11/04/final-projection-obama-349-mccain-189.aspx&quot;&gt;Obama&apos;s 6-point victory over McCain&lt;/a&gt;.  Now the stats guru &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nate_Silver&quot;&gt;Nate Silver&lt;/a&gt; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/movies/features/54335/&quot;&gt;picking the Oscar winners&lt;/a&gt; and predicting an upset win for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0378245/&quot;&gt;Taraji P. Henson&lt;/a&gt; in the Best Supporting Actress category.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79314</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:34:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AcademyAwards</category>
		<category>baseball</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>NateSilver</category>
		<category>Oscars</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>predictions</category>
		<category>statistics</category>
		<category>stats</category>
		<category>TarajiPHenson</category>
		<dc:creator>jonp72</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Robert Downey Jr. should (but won&apos;t) get an Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78551/Robert%2DDowney%2DJr%2Dshould%2Dbut%2Dwont%2Dget%2Dan%2DOscar</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/23/2472612.htm&quot;&gt;Heath was great &lt;/a&gt; but &lt;a href=&quot;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/files/2009/01/blackface-at-th.html&quot;&gt;Robert&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firstshowing.net/2008/10/19/robert-downey-jr-for-best-supporting-actor-in-tropic-thunder/&quot;&gt;Downey &lt;/a&gt; Jr. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zimbio.com/Heath+Ledger/articles/417/Dear+Academy+Don+t+Give+Heath+Ledger+Posthumas&quot;&gt;should win.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78551</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:41:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Dark</category>
		<category>Downey</category>
		<category>Heath</category>
		<category>Jr</category>
		<category>Knight</category>
		<category>Ledger</category>
		<category>Oscars</category>
		<category>Robert</category>
		<category>Thunder</category>
		<category>Tropic</category>
		<dc:creator>JVA</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pirating the 2009 Oscars.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78533/Pirating%2Dthe%2D2009%2DOscars</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://waxy.org/2009/01/pirating_the_2009_oscars/"&gt;Pirating the 2009 Oscars&lt;/a&gt; Metafilter&apos;s own waxpancake gives us an &lt;em&gt;exhaustive&lt;/em&gt; analysis of the current crop of Oscar nominees, and how many of their releases are available via Bittorrent.  With spreadsheets! </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78533</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:42:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bittorrent</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<dc:creator>the dief</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>And the winner is . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69301/And%2Dthe%2Dwinner%2Dis</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194803/oscars-hollywood"&gt;Oscar Night In Hollywood&lt;/a&gt; &quot;If we can huckster a President into the White House, why cannot we huckster the agonized Miss Joan Crawford or the hard and beautiful Miss Olivia de Havilland into possession of one of those golden statuettes which express the motion picture industry&apos;s frantic desire to kiss itself on the back of its neck?&quot;

The Atlantic reprints an indispensible Raymond Chandler article from 1948.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69301</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:41:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atlanticmonthly</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>raymondchandler</category>
		<dc:creator>Skot</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Oscar winning shorts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69014/Oscar%2Dwinning%2Dshorts</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=XfiTeXdVCD8&quot;&gt;Mona Lisa Descending a Staircase&lt;/a&gt; and  &lt;a href=&quot;http://m-matos.blogspot.com/2008/02/academy-award-winners-for-cartoonshort.html&quot;&gt;45 more Oscar winning animations.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69014</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:42:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>animation</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>shortfilm</category>
		<dc:creator>vronsky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>2008 Animated Short Film Oscar Noms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68733/2008%2DAnimated%2DShort%2DFilm%2DOscar%2DNoms</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ozoux.com/eclectic/archive/2008/02/01/2008-animated-shorts-nominees"&gt;The 2008 Oscar nominated animated shorts&lt;/a&gt; are online.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://notcot.org&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68733</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:31:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academyawards</category>
		<category>animated</category>
		<category>awards</category>
		<category>nominees</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>shortfilms</category>
		<category>shorts</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>My Fair Ladys are both in control and easily led</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68495/My%2DFair%2DLadys%2Dare%2Dboth%2Din%2Dcontrol%2Dand%2Deasily%2Dled</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gretachristina.typepad.com/greta_christinas_weblog/2008/01/oscarology-th-1.html"&gt;Oscarology&lt;/a&gt; is a system of astrology I invented -- excuse me, that was revealed to me in a powerful mystical experience -- based on what movie won the Best Picture Oscar for the year you were born. I have been communing with the Spirit of the Oscars and transcribing the visions it has vouchsafed to me.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68495</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:29:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astrology</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>oscarology</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>stars</category>
		<category>woowoo</category>
		<dc:creator>arcticwoman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Every time an Oscar is given out, an agent gets his wings&quot; ~ Kathy Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58941/Every%2Dtime%2Dan%2DOscar%2Dis%2Dgiven%2Dout%2Dan%2Dagent%2Dgets%2Dhis%2Dwings%2DKathy%2DBates</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eudesign.com/oscars/osc-curi.htm"&gt;Oscar Lists: Records And Curiosities.&lt;/a&gt; A plethora of fun facts to keep you entertained while you wait for the start of the 79th annual Academy Awards ceremony today/tonight. It&apos;s part of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eudesign.com/oscars/&quot;&gt;Oscar Lists: The Index&lt;/a&gt;, which is filled with almost every Oscar fact you could possibly need.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58941</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:08:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academyawards</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>amyms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Oscar the Grouch</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58479/Oscar%2Dthe%2DGrouch</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.oscarwatch.com/2007/02/oscarwatchcom.html"&gt;AMPAS ankles Oscarwatch skein&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oscars.org/&quot;&gt;Academy&lt;/a&gt; has brought the banhammer down on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://oscarwatch.com/&quot;&gt;Oscarwatch blog&lt;/a&gt;, issuing a demand that blogger Sasha Stone cease and desist from using the Oscar trademark in her domain name. Why now after 7 1/2 years of blogging under that name? Maybe because they found out about &lt;a href=&quot;http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/archives/2007/02/ampas_vs_sasha.php&quot;&gt;her whopping $20k yearly ad revenue&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58479</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:54:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academyawards</category>
		<category>AMPAS</category>
		<category>ceaseanddesist</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>oscarwatch</category>
		<dc:creator>Horace Rumpole</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I am shocked -- shocked! -- to hear the Academy doesn&apos;t always vote for quality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49984/I%2Dam%2Dshocked%2Dshocked%2Dto%2Dhear%2Dthe%2DAcademy%2Ddoesnt%2Dalways%2Dvote%2Dfor%2Dquality</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1727309,00.html"&gt;A Sour Grapes Rant:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The people connected with Brokeback Mountain, including me, hoped that, having been nominated for eight Academy awards, it would get Best Picture... We should have known conservative heffalump academy voters would have rather different ideas of what was stirring contemporary culture... Next year we can look to the awards for controversial themes on the punishment of adulterers with a branding iron in the shape of the letter A, runaway slaves, and the debate over free silver.&quot; -- E. Annie Proulx unleashes in &lt;i&gt;The Guardian&lt;/i&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49984</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:24:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BrokeBackMountain</category>
		<category>EAnnieProulx</category>
		<category>Oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>docgonzo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Oscar Roundups</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49787/Oscar%2DRoundups</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themoderatevoice.com/posts/1141634675.shtml&quot;&gt;&quot;Mixed&quot; reviews&lt;/a&gt; of John Stewart&apos;s performance last night. A reminder that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laweekly.com/deadline-hollywood/12564/how-gay-will-oscar-go/&quot;&gt;someone warned in February&lt;/a&gt; that Crash might win best picture because many Academy members were &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com&quot;&gt;unwilling to screen Brokeback Mountain&lt;/a&gt;&quot; &lt;small&gt;[permalinks broken, scroll down]&lt;/small&gt;. Marvel that YouTube &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calacanis.com/2006/03/06/youtube-gets-the-rights-to-oscar-videos-wow/&quot;&gt;somehow managed to get rights&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[cough]&lt;/small&gt; to Oscar video, at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.catwalkqueen.tv/2006/03/oscars_frock_ph.html&quot;&gt;Oscar&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.catwalkqueen.tv/2006/03/oscar_frocks_pa.html&quot;&gt;frocks&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/oscars/oscars-hangover-that-thing-on-charlize-therons-shoulder-158631.php&quot;&gt;that thing on Charlize Theron&apos;s shoulder&lt;/a&gt;, and at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsfromme.com/archives/2006_03_05.html#011082&quot;&gt;persistent myth&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content?050228ta_talk_radosh&quot;&gt;a billion people&lt;/a&gt; watched the awards.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49787</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:47:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academyawards</category>
		<category>hollywood</category>
		<category>jonstewart</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>mediareport</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Oscars moments</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49679/Oscars%2Dmoments</link>
		<description> The Oscars don&apos;t only breed argument about who should have won--but also about the speeches? 
Were they &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myvillage.com/pages/celebs-oscars-best-speeches.htm&quot;&gt;good&lt;/a&gt;? Did they &lt;a href=&quot;http://entertainment.msn.co.uk/films/features/oscarsworstspeeches/Default.asp&quot;&gt;suck&lt;/a&gt;?  What are the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/movies/oscars/speeches.htm&quot;&gt;classics&lt;/a&gt;? What&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://quotations.about.com/od/movieandtvquote/a/oscars1.htm&quot;&gt;Memorable&lt;/a&gt;? What&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Field&quot;&gt;Misquoted&lt;/a&gt;? 

How would &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ratedrookie.com/meat.html&quot;&gt;your speech&lt;/a&gt; go? Would you thank your &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/entertainment/specialreport/0001AD77-6D72-1E4A-8A1980C344F80000.htm&quot;&gt;makeup man&lt;/a&gt;&quot;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/halleberryoscarspeech.htm&quot;&gt;Oprah&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allstarz.org/%7Eseanconnery/quotes_2.htm&quot;&gt;Complain&lt;/a&gt;? Or just go &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.murphsplace.com/olivier/oscar.html&quot;&gt;crazy&lt;/a&gt;?

And here are some more top ones (&lt;a href=&quot;http://quotations.about.com/od/movieandtvquote/a/oscars2.htm&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://quotations.about.com/od/movieandtvquote/a/oscars3.htm&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://quotations.about.com/od/movieandtvquote/a/oscars4.htm&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;) and another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myvillage.com/pages/celebs-oscars-worst-speeches.htm&quot;&gt;bottom&lt;/a&gt;. And Oscar Night &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mapaubingo.com/buzzword-bingo-oscar-night.asp&quot;&gt;bingo&lt;/a&gt; in case it all gets to be too much, too boring or too damn long.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49679</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:45:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academyawards</category>
		<category>brokeback</category>
		<category>entertainment</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>game</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>speeches</category>
		<dc:creator>FeldBum</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Is Jon Stewart ready for his closeup?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49612/Is%2DJon%2DStewart%2Dready%2Dfor%2Dhis%2Dcloseup</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/27/lkl.01.html"&gt;At this Larry King interview&lt;/a&gt; and in other places, Jon Stewart is getting ready for his very big &quot;before and after&quot; moment. In one week he will go from hosting a sort of anti-establishment &quot;basic cable&quot; talk show to hosting the very establishment (of some sort at least) Oscars viewed by usually at least 40 million people. Despite what most of us me-fiers might think, Stewart is sort of unknown outside his core devotees and especially for a Oscar host -- unlike Bob Hope, Billy Crystal, Whoopi Goldberg, and even Chris Rock -- he has never been responsible for a hit movie.       Moreover, his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/politics/cablenewsratings.htm&quot;&gt;ratings&lt;/a&gt; (at 1.1 -- or about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/388148p-329167c.html&quot;&gt;two and half million&lt;/a&gt; people a night) would place him at about the sixth most seen cable news &quot;show&quot; -- behind Greta, Shepard Smith, Hannity, Larry, and, of course, the factor.  Now, that&apos;s a very wealthy, influential 2-3 million viewers that policy makers and advertisers love, so it&apos;s not chicken change but you can still understand what the Oscars might mean for fans of Jon.      For people who believe Stewart is the only effective keeper of a liberal flame, you can only hope he will continue to impress on the bigger stage.  However, some people are getting worried -- a la the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/28/movies/redcarpet/28wadler.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;NYT&lt;/a&gt;
and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w060227&amp;s=siegel022706&quot;&gt;New Republic &lt;/a&gt; which is already claiming Stewart is losing his bite in order to please Hollywood and that he might not be so funny in the first place.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49612</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:39:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>dailyshow</category>
		<category>jonsteward</category>
		<category>larryking</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>skepticallypleased</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Myrna Loy, Luminous Activist&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48852/Myrna%2DLoy%2DLuminous%2DActivist</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;&#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t you know, the kid they pick to play tramps is the only good girl in Hollywood.&#8221; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/br&gt;
Before &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=2400&quot;&gt;Myrna&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Myrna+Loy&quot;&gt;Loy&lt;/a&gt; rose to stardom with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/6302241200/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Manhattan Melodrama&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filmsite.org/thin.html&quot;&gt;The Thin Man&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(both 1934)&lt;/small&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filmbrain.com/filmbrain/2006/01/the_orientaliza.html&quot;&gt;she was often relegated to playing vamps, mistresses, and other assorted flavors of wicked women&lt;/a&gt;. Then, after 80 movies playing mostly bad girls, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myrnaloycenter.com/&quot;&gt;Montana native Loy&lt;/a&gt; became &#8220;the perfect wife.&#8221; &#8220;&lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/artsentertainment/2002079777_thinman03.html&quot;&gt;Men Must Marry Myrna Loy&lt;/a&gt;&#8221; clubs were formed around the country. She and Clark Gable, in a poll conducted by Ed Sullivan, were voted by 20 million of the nation&#8217;s moviegoers as The King and Queen of Hollywood. She was FDR&apos;s favorite actress, and John Dillinger &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.albany.edu/writers-inst/fns00n10.html&quot;&gt;died just to see her new movie&lt;/a&gt;. A staunch &lt;a href=&quot;http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Myrna+Loy&quot;&gt;anti-Nazi since the mid-Thirties&lt;/a&gt; (to MGM&apos;s dismay, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/guides/guide-display/-/1CCTFBO2DZLEL/002-9823318-2459235&quot;&gt;Hitler promptly banned her films from the lucrative German market&lt;/a&gt;), wondered aloud in the press why blacks were always given servants&apos; roles, and was the first major star to buck the studios in a contract dispute (the issue: equal pay for equal work. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1556111010/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;She was making half what William Powell was, didn&apos;t like it and quit work for nearly a year until MGM capitulated&lt;/a&gt;). When WWII broke out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reelclassics.com/Actresses/Myrna/myrna-article.htm&quot;&gt;she quit Hollywood and worked full time for the Red Cross&lt;/a&gt;, and helped run a Naval Auxilary Canteen. More inside.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48852</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:37:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AcademyAwards</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>cinema</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>Oscar</category>
		<category>Oscars</category>
		<category>WWII</category>
		<dc:creator>matteo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Oscar Noms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48736/The%2DOscar%2DNoms</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.oscar.com/nominees/print.html"&gt;78th Annual Academy Awards Nominations&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48736</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:10:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AcadamyAwards</category>
		<category>Hollywoodbullshit</category>
		<category>Oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>Hanover Phist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Decision 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48048/Decision%2D2006</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/01/05/jon-stewart-oscars-cx_gl_0105autofacescan13.html"&gt;Jon Stewart to host 2006 Academy Awards.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;As a performer, I&apos;m truly honored to be hosting the show,&apos; Stewart says. &quot;As an avid watcher of the Oscars, I can&apos;t help but be a little disappointed with the choice.&apos;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48048</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:28:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academyawards</category>
		<category>dailyshow</category>
		<category>jonstewart</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>Robot Johnny</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>FUCKING MONEY!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40049/FUCKING%2DMONEY</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nfb.ca/oscars2005/ryanchoix300.html"&gt;Ryan&lt;/a&gt; , the Oscar winner for Best Short Film, is a canadian 3d and 2d animated masterpiece.  I wish I could provide more than the material already provided by Andy Baio, but I just felt like you all should see this.  It&apos;s the true story of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.awn.com/mag/issue5.08/5.08pages/robinsonlarkin.php3&quot;&gt;Ryan Landis&lt;/a&gt;, a brilliant artist devastated by the real world.  It&apos;s also the story of his impact on the director.  That really doesn&apos;t do it justice.  Please just click.  &lt;more&gt;apology inside&lt;/more&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40049</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:06:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2d</category>
		<category>3d</category>
		<category>animation</category>
		<category>landis</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>shmegegge</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A Berry for Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39996/A%2DBerry%2Dfor%2DBerry</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.razzies.com/asp/directory/XcDirectory.asp&quot;&gt;The 25th annual Razzies&lt;/a&gt; were held this weekend, honoring the worst films of 2004.  Without a doubt, the highlight of the event was the nomination (and subsequent winning) of Halle Berry for her abysmal participation in &lt;em&gt;Catwoman&lt;/em&gt;.  Why?  Berry actually attended the ceremony to recieve her award, saying among other things &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?storyID=7748301&amp;type=entertainmentNews&quot;&gt;&quot;I want to thank Warner Brothers for casting me in this piece of shit.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39996</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:38:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Catwoman</category>
		<category>HalleBerry</category>
		<category>Movies</category>
		<category>Oscars</category>
		<category>Razzies</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Oscar Goodie bags</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39943/Oscar%2DGoodie%2Dbags</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.girlhacker.com/2005_02_01_archive.html#110895778645830377"&gt;girlhacker&apos;s 2005 Oscar Goodie bag list is out&lt;/a&gt; (here&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.girlhacker.com/2004_02_01_archive.html#107769666914063510&quot;&gt;2004&apos;s&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.girlhacker.com/2003_03_01_archive.html#200003147&quot;&gt;2003&apos;s&lt;/a&gt;) so now we can envy all the free stuff stars will be getting, even though they could easily afford to buy it all a thousand times over.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39943</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:47:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>celebrities</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Oscars for stuntmen</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39684/Oscars%2Dfor%2Dstuntmen</link>
		<description> Do Hollywood stuntmen deserve their own Oscar category? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brandxstunts.org/trailer.htm&quot;&gt;Judge for yourself&lt;/a&gt; [qt]. Major &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuntmen.com/about/history.shtml&quot;&gt;stunt&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isastunts.com/bios.html&quot;&gt;organizations &lt;/a&gt; have now &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050216/law129_1.html&quot;&gt;joined forces&lt;/a&gt; to lobby the Academy to finally create an award for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/16/movies/oscars/16stun.html?ex=1266296400&amp;en=0374ad53bbf30856&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&quot;&gt;Best Stunt Coordinator&lt;/a&gt;. Does athleticism, courage and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isastunts.com/action/brett_jones.html&quot;&gt;sheer gung-ho physicality&lt;/a&gt; deserve the same kind of recognition given to other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oscars.org/77academyawards/nomannc/index.html&quot;&gt;Oscar categories&lt;/a&gt;? Only once has the Academy officially recognized a stuntman, with an Honorary Oscar for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allmovie.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&amp;sql=B84044&quot;&gt;pioneering  stunt coordinator Yakima Canutt&lt;/a&gt; in 1967.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39684</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:49:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>hollywood</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>stuntmen</category>
		<dc:creator>mediareport</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Spurning Giamatti</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38957/Spurning%2DGiamatti</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://oscars.com/nominees/nominees.html"&gt;Nominations for 77th Annual Academy Awards:&lt;/a&gt; OK, so &lt;i&gt;Sideways&lt;/i&gt; gets nominations for &lt;a href=&quot;http://oscars.com/nominees/nom_33719.html&quot;&gt;Best Picture&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://oscars.com/nominees/nom_33978.html&quot;&gt;Best Director&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://oscars.com/nominees/nom_34173.html&quot;&gt;Best Screenplay (Adapted)&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://oscars.com/nominees/nom_33833.html&quot;&gt;Best &lt;i&gt;Supporting&lt;/i&gt; Actor&lt;/a&gt; aaaand &lt;a href=&quot;http://oscars.com/nominees/nom_33858.html&quot;&gt;Best Supporting Actress&lt;/a&gt;, but Paul Giamatti--arguably the linchpin of the whole flick--gets stiffed. (Jamie Foxx, on the other hand, gets &lt;a href=&quot;http://oscars.com/nominees/nom_33824.html&quot;&gt;nominated&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://oscars.com/nominees/nom_33836.html&quot;&gt;twice&lt;/a&gt;...not that there&apos;s anything wrong with that!)
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Travesty, or just an indication of an incredibly rich &quot;Best Actor&quot; field?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38957</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:25:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>giamatti</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<dc:creator>LairBob</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Why Gollum shouldn&apos;t win an Oscar.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30712/Why%2DGollum%2Dshouldnt%2Dwin%2Dan%2DOscar</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/answ-man/sho-sunday-ebert11.html"&gt;Why Gollum shouldn&apos;t win an Oscar.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-21912&quot;&gt;Many &lt;i&gt;Lord of the Rings&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; fans think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.serkis.com/&quot;&gt;Andy Serkis&lt;/a&gt; should be nominated for an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oscars.org/index.html&quot;&gt;Academy Award&lt;/a&gt; for his work in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lordoftherings.net/&quot;&gt;the films&lt;/a&gt;, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suntimes.com/output/answ-man/sho-sunday-ebert11.html&quot;&gt;as Roger Ebert writes&lt;/a&gt;, the actor shouldn&apos;t benefit because animators kept Gollum from falling into &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arclight.net/~pdb/glimpses/valley.html&quot;&gt;the Uncanny Valley&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30712</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:23:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>academyawards</category>
		<category>andyserkis</category>
		<category>gollum</category>
		<category>lordoftherings</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>rogerebert</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>For Your Inconsideration...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28699/For%2DYour%2DInconsideration</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/wire/2003/09/30/screener/"&gt;&quot;I aim to close every kind of hole in the dike I can find on piracy,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; and with those words, MPAA demon Jack Valenti &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2003/09/30/screener_copies_for_oscar_voting_banned/&quot;&gt;banned&lt;/a&gt; all DVD and VHS screeners of this years Oscar nominated films.  File under &quot;Throwing the baby out with the bathwater.&quot;  Next up: Valenti plans to remove everyone&apos;s eyeballs with a rusty spoon.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28699</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>filmpiracy</category>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>jackvalenti</category>
		<category>mpaa</category>
		<category>oscars</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<dc:creator>WolfDaddy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


