<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with overpriced</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/overpriced</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'overpriced' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:39:19 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:39:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>We&apos;ll throw in the doghouse for only &amp;#0163;100,000 extra... deal?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/57999/Well%2Dthrow%2Din%2Dthe%2Ddoghouse%2Dfor%2Donly%2D0163100000%2Dextra%2Ddeal</link>
		<description> Wow. And I thought California property was &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003536872_flat23.html&quot;&gt;expensive&lt;/a&gt;. Lordy.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.57999</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:39:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>expensive</category>
		<category>insanity</category>
		<category>london</category>
		<category>overpriced</category>
		<category>property</category>
		<category>realty</category>
		<category>wtf</category>
		<dc:creator>miss lynnster</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


