<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with paki</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/paki</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'paki' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:21:25 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:21:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>User may incur custodial sentence for use of non-court approved words.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27617/User%2Dmay%2Dincur%2Dcustodial%2Dsentence%2Dfor%2Duse%2Dof%2Dnoncourt%2Dapproved%2Dwords</link>
		<description> In a new twist to a theme discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/26434&quot;&gt;earlier on MeFi&lt;/a&gt;, on language censorship (but in an entirely different case) the UK might be the first country  to jail a man for using &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/3145081.stm&quot;&gt;a single court-prohibited word&lt;/a&gt; in public.
&lt;br&gt;As repellent as the defendant&apos;s behaviour was, can such a case of censorship and prohibition of freedom of speech ever be justified?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27617</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:21:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>FreedomOfSpeech</category>
		<category>jail</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>Paki</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hey, wassup [censored]?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26434/Hey%2Dwassup%2Dcensored</link>
		<description> The &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2993908.stm&quot;&gt;criminalisation&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/race/story/0,11374,978732,00.html&quot;&gt;language&lt;/a&gt;?.&lt;br&gt;
A judge rules that chanting &quot;Paki&quot; at a football match is a criminal offence. &quot;Lord Justice Auld ruled...that the word &apos;Paki&apos; was &apos;a slang expression which is racially offensive.&apos;&quot; Personally I come from a culture that finds it acceptable to say things like &quot;I&apos;m just going to the Paki shop, do you want anything?&quot;[Pakistani owned corner shop] and &quot;Anyone fancy a chinki?&quot; [Chinese food.]&lt;i&gt;I&apos;ve&lt;/i&gt; used the terms and I think racism is silly; now I&apos;m a racist criminal I guess.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26434</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:25:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>criminalisation</category>
		<category>lanuage</category>
		<category>paki</category>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


