<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with palladium</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/palladium</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'palladium' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 13:27:24 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 13:27:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>All your content are belong to us</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42355/All%2Dyour%2Dcontent%2Dare%2Dbelong%2Dto%2Dus</link>
		<description> Think you&apos;re in full control of your computer? 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitmag.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=4915&quot;&gt;Think again. &lt;/a&gt;
Intel has just quietly added one of the necessary components of Microsoft&apos;s (and the TCG/TCPA&apos;s) 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html&quot;&gt;DRM
technology&lt;/a&gt;, Palladium, to the PC platform. Some say this is a move against 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/ITFacts/index.php?id=P762&quot;&gt;rampant Chinese software piracy&lt;/a&gt;,
others think it&apos;s a power grab by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.disney.com&quot;&gt;content producers.&lt;/a&gt; Left unchecked, content and software producers will
have the final say in how you use your computer, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use&quot;&gt;fair use&lt;/a&gt; be damned.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42355</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 13:27:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>computing</category>
		<category>drm</category>
		<category>fair</category>
		<category>intel</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>palladium</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>tcg</category>
		<category>tcpa</category>
		<category>use</category>
		<dc:creator>id</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19872/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/253/business/Intel_chip_to_include_antipiracy_features+.shtml"&gt;Its the end of Online anonimity as we know it.&lt;/a&gt; Intel announces that its next generation of CPUs will have Digital Rights Management hardwired onboard the chip. See also Microsoft&apos;s Palladium, an OS-level identity and rights management scheme. 

&lt;small&gt;(is this Wintel&apos;s idea of how to jump start anemic computer sales?)&lt;/small&gt;
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19872</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:15:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DRM</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>MicrosoftPalladium</category>
		<category>palladium</category>
		<dc:creator>BentPenguin</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18050/</link>
		<description> Microsoft unleashes Palladium, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/770511.asp&quot;&gt;an intrusive doozy&lt;/a&gt; of a feature involving specially secure AMD/Intel computer chips and cryptology provided by Microsoft.  Newsweek&apos;s head-bobbing Steven Levy, the first to get the story, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/770511.asp&quot;&gt;remains taciturn&lt;/a&gt;, failing to call into question Microsoft&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.com.com/2100-1001-808010.html?legacy=cnet&quot;&gt;security sins of the past&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itworld.com/Sec/2052/020625palladiumconcerns/&quot; target=&quot;first_window&quot;&gt;Geeks run scared&lt;/a&gt; while &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25891.html&quot; target=&quot;first_window&quot;&gt;digital rights and GPL concerns&lt;/a&gt; are wholly ignored by the mainstream media.  Is this yet another example of a malcontent media that will never possess the balls to actually question a new feature put out by Microsoft?  Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,53466,00.html&quot; target=&quot;first_window&quot;&gt;Wired&lt;/a&gt; can&apos;t seem to read between the lines of a technology that &quot;stemmed from early work by engineers to deliver digital movies that couldn&apos;t be pirated.&quot;

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18050</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlinks</category>
		<category>cryptology</category>
		<category>digitalrights</category>
		<category>geeks</category>
		<category>intrusion</category>
		<category>intrusive</category>
		<category>malcontent</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>newsweek</category>
		<category>palladium</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>wired</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


