<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with pearlharbor</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/pearlharbor</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'pearlharbor' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:44:43 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:44:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>History Repeats and Hollywood Remakes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78031/History%2DRepeats%2Dand%2DHollywood%2DRemakes</link>
		<description> You know the trouble with Historically-Based Movies? Unless you&apos;re an uneducated, ignorant moran, you know how they&apos;re gonna end. At least that&apos;s the argument of this &lt;em&gt;Premiere&lt;/em&gt; article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.premiere.com/List/10-Movie-Endings-Spoiled-By-History&quot;&gt;10 Movie Endings Spoiled By History&lt;/a&gt;. Of course there are ways to avoid that problem, as Cracked.com&apos;s (yeah, them) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cracked.com/article_15014_11-movies-saved-by-historical-inaccuracy.html&quot;&gt;11 Movies &lt;em&gt;Saved&lt;/em&gt; by Historical Inaccuracy&lt;/a&gt; declares. Books have been written about &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.southcoasttoday.com/daily/02-00/02-12-00/b03li072.htm&quot;&gt;Historical Movies&apos; accuracy or inaccuracy&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.filmcrave.com/list_genre_movie.php?genre=Historical&quot;&gt;everybody has an opinion&lt;/a&gt; on what &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historyplace.com/films/index.html&quot;&gt;the Best Historical Movies are&lt;/a&gt;, but if you want your History purely entertaining, there&apos;s only one &lt;strike&gt;man&lt;/strike&gt;dog you can count on: here are Mr. Peabody, Sherman and the &lt;em&gt;original&lt;/em&gt; Wayback Machine dropping in on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbESbvcjMhc&quot;&gt;Cristopher Columbus&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiKlk_90rPg&quot;&gt;Pancho Villa&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMQQea_2Q68&quot;&gt;Francisco Pizarro and the Incas&lt;/a&gt; (sorry, no USA History episodes on YouTube). Notes: &quot;300&quot; is the only movie on both the &apos;Spoiled by History&apos; and &apos;Saved by Historical Inaccuracy&apos; lists. But it was the inclusion of the &lt;strong&gt;Star Wars Prequels&lt;/strong&gt; on Premiere&apos;s &apos;History&apos; list that motivated me to make this post. What The Frak?!?

And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YunO4Wc8E28&quot;&gt;the first episode of Peabody&apos;s Improbable History&lt;/a&gt; is less about history and more about adoption issues that are still relevant today. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78031</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:44:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2001</category>
		<category>300</category>
		<category>amadeus</category>
		<category>braveheart</category>
		<category>coldmountain</category>
		<category>frostnixon</category>
		<category>gladiator</category>
		<category>historicalmovies</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>improbablehistory</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>passionofthechrist</category>
		<category>peabody</category>
		<category>pearlharbor</category>
		<category>sherman</category>
		<category>starwars</category>
		<category>titanic</category>
		<category>united93</category>
		<category>valkyrie</category>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dirty, dangerous, and detailed.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56799/Dirty%2Ddangerous%2Dand%2Ddetailed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/events/wwii-pac/pearlhbr/ph-salv.htm"&gt;Pearl Harbor ship salvage&lt;/a&gt; began &lt;a href=&quot;http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2001/Nov/23/ln/ln04a.html&quot;&gt;immediately&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.homeofheroes.com/pearlharbor/pearl_7ashes.html&quot;&gt;after&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href=&quot;http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/specials/pearlharbor60/chapter2.html&quot;&gt;attack&lt;/a&gt; and continued until 1944. It was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h63000/h63919.jpg&quot;&gt;dirty&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/memory/22-2527a.gif&quot;&gt;dangerous&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/memory/22-2528a.gif&quot;&gt;detailed&lt;/a&gt;, (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youth.net/memories/hypermail/0358.html&quot;&gt;discouraging&lt;/a&gt;) work for U.S. Navy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/memory/22-2543a.gif&quot;&gt;salvors&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0891415890/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;divers&lt;/a&gt;, but their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/memory/22-2523a.gif&quot;&gt;impressive&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/memory/22-2540a.gif&quot;&gt;repairs&lt;/a&gt; eventually returned &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pastfoundation.org/Arizona/Salvage.htm&quot;&gt;eighteen sunken and damaged ships&lt;/a&gt; to wartime service. Only &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pastfoundation.org/Arizona/ArizonaHistory.htm&quot;&gt;one&lt;/a&gt; was left &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.submerged.co.uk/arizona3big.jpg&quot;&gt;where she fell&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;[More in the book &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1557504881/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Resurrection: Salvaging the Battle Fleet at Pearl Harbor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56799</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 01:35:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>divers</category>
		<category>PearlHarbor</category>
		<category>salvage</category>
		<category>ships</category>
		<category>ussarizona</category>
		<dc:creator>cenoxo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A date which will live in infamy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47347/A%2Ddate%2Dwhich%2Dwill%2Dlive%2Din%2Dinfamy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://americanrhetoric.com/speeches/fdrpearlharbor.htm"&gt;December seventh, nineteen forty one.&lt;/a&gt; 64 Years ago today, 2,471 people were killed in the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. In response, one of our greatest leaders made one of his greatest speeches. And you can listen to it here.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47347</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:09:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fdr</category>
		<category>leadership</category>
		<category>pearlharbor</category>
		<dc:creator>Mayor Curley</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13938/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.unitedstates.com/news/farticle/740136?20020116224038"&gt;Jerry Bruckheimer Presents: Sept. 11, the movie&lt;/a&gt; He&apos;s done Pearl Harbor, which I guess makes this a natural next step. But will he wait until the earth cools at Ground Zero? And who&apos;ll play Osama? (Link via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.darkhorizons.com/news-n.htm&quot;&gt;Dark Horizons&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13938</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:37:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>9-11</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>jerrybruckheimer</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>pearlharbor</category>
		<category>wtc</category>
		<dc:creator>krewson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10752/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/answ-man/sho-sunday-ebert23.html"&gt;Ebert&apos;s movie answer man &lt;/a&gt; features this pretty sharp and dead-on letter from Derek Muller from Royal Oak, Michigan:

&quot;Here&apos;s an idea for a movie to be made in the year 2060: An epic about the attacks against the Twin Towers. Only let the three-hour film focus mainly on a love triangle stemming from a pair of friends as stock traders in New York and a young receptionist. When one of them is on a plane from Boston to L.A. and another is busy with a client in the Twin Towers, the men are suddenly thrust in the middle of a terrible plot where there is chaos and tragedy, but we completely disregard the 5,000 citizens dead and instead concern ourselves with the love lives of three whining yuppies. Or, we could just look at &apos;&apos;Pearl Harbor&apos;&apos; and think about how horrible it is to trivialize such a tragedy on the screen.&quot; 
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10752</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2001 13:36:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>PearlHarbor</category>
		<dc:creator>adrober</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10464/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pearlharborattacked.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard/topic.cgi?forum=26&amp;amp;topic=19"&gt;Admiral Yamamoto never said&lt;/a&gt; &quot;I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve&quot; (or something like that) after Pearl Harbor. That line came from &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://us.imdb.com/Title?0066473&quot;&gt;Tora! Tora! Tora!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; Worth noting because an innumerable number of newspaper columnists have been &quot;quoting&quot; Yamamoto in light of the WTC attack.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10464</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:52:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>pearlharbor</category>
		<category>quotes</category>
		<category>yamamoto</category>
		<dc:creator>mcwetboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8715/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://us.imdb.com/StudioBrief/#3"&gt;Oh me oh my:&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Video bootleggers have flooded the underground market with thousands of copies of a film labeled &lt;u&gt;Pearl Harbor&lt;/u&gt; that contains only five minutes of the actual movie. The rest of the video contains hard porn material featuring Caucasian and Asian actors.&lt;/i&gt; All together now: At Least It&apos;s More Interesting Than The Actual Movie. (link only good until the morning of July 2nd)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8715</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:47:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bootleg</category>
		<category>bootlegs</category>
		<category>deadlinks</category>
		<category>pearlharbor</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<dc:creator>logovisual</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8008/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://ojr.usc.edu/content/story.cfm?request=589"&gt;Whoops! Sam Donaldson Reinvents History&lt;/a&gt; More on the blurring of fantasy and reality in Pearl Harbor&apos;s promotion efforts. &quot;This is no excuse, but we were all working
against a deadline,&quot; says Donaldson.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8008</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2001 10:22:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>pearlharbor</category>
		<category>samdonaldson</category>
		<dc:creator>josholalia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


