<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with pentagon and Bush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/pentagon+Bush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'pentagon' and 'Bush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:32:25 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:32:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Can you trust a television military analyst?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70988/Can%2Dyou%2Dtrust%2Da%2Dtelevision%2Dmilitary%2Danalyst</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?&amp;amp;pagewanted=all"&gt;Television military analysts are wooed, courted, and privileged by the Pentagon.&lt;/a&gt; An in-depth investigative report by the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; uncovers logrolling, shilling, touting, back-scratching, and just plain bias on the part of the experts that television networks put on the air to talk about the war. Some of them appear to be as good as owned by the Defense Department. &quot;The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air. Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70988</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:32:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>analysts</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>Mo Nickels</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Rebels in the Ranks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50755/Rebels%2Din%2Dthe%2DRanks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1181587,00.html"&gt;&quot;I&apos;ve been silent long enough...&lt;/a&gt; My sincere view is that the commitment of our forces to this fight was done with a casualness and swagger that are the special province of those who have never had to execute these missions--or bury the results.&quot; Marine Lieutenant General Greg Newbold, the Pentagon&apos;s former top operations officer, becomes the latest military insider to raise his voice against the &quot;zealots&quot; who led the US into war in Iraq. He writes in &lt;i&gt;Time&lt;/i&gt; magazine: &quot;Never again, we thought, would our military&apos;s senior leaders remain silent as American troops were marched off to an ill-considered engagement. It&apos;s 35 years later, and the judgment is in: the Who had it wrong. We have been fooled again... After 9/11, I was a witness and therefore a party to the actions that led us to the invasion of Iraq--an unnecessary war.&quot; During the Vietnam war, such discontent among soldiers sparked a massive campaign of disobedience and peace activism (as well as, more darkly, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frag_%28military%29&quot;&gt;fragging&lt;/a&gt;) within the ranks, as recounted in a new documentary called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sirnosir.com/ &quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sir! No Sir!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  Can it happen again? Ask the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sftt.org/main.cfm&quot;&gt;Soldiers for the Truth&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50755</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 09:40:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>AlQaeda</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>DefenseDepartment</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>JointChiefsofStaff</category>
		<category>Newbold</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>sir!nosir!</category>
		<category>Vietnam</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Your Hosts, Lynndie and Charles, Welcome You to the New Interrogation Facility</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49887/Your%2DHosts%2DLynndie%2Dand%2DCharles%2DWelcome%2DYou%2Dto%2Dthe%2DNew%2DInterrogation%2DFacility</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11744879/"&gt;Adieu, Abu Ghraib&lt;/a&gt; -- we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/images/2006/02/16/imagec4c6f55b-0fea-474a-a736-a07cdffe0952.jpg&quot;&gt;hardly&lt;/a&gt; knew ye (classified, ya know.)  In the wake of a damning &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1170286,00.html&quot;&gt;Amnesty International report&lt;/a&gt;, military spokesperson Keir-Kevin Curry says the &lt;a href=&quot;http://iraq-pow-abuse.tripod.com/photos/powusa.gif&quot;&gt;infamous Baghdad prison&lt;/a&gt; will be closed within three months, its occupants transferred to other facilities in Iraq, including Camp Cropper (and don&apos;t ask what&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.counterpunch.org/fisk07242003.html&quot;&gt;happening there &lt;/a&gt;, or the terrorists win.) Or is Curry&apos;s statement &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2006/20060309_4434.html&quot;&gt;premature&lt;/a&gt;?   And would the closing of Abu Ghraib represent a change of policy, or merely rebranding the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_prisoner_abuse&quot;&gt;same old same old&lt;/a&gt; to avoid &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indybay.org/uploads/ra4122848116.jpg&quot;&gt;bad associations&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49887</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:54:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AbuGhraib</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>CharlesGraner</category>
		<category>interrogation</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>LynndieEngland</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>torture</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sticker Shock and Awe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48846/Sticker%2DShock%2Dand%2DAwe</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/t01212003_t019sdstakeoutfox.html&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Then:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Q - Mr. Secretary, on Iraq, how much money do you think the Department of Defense would need to pay for a war with Iraq?

Rumsfeld - Well, the Office of Management and Budget, has come up come up with a number that&apos;s something under $50 billion for the cost. How much of that would be the U.S. burden, and how much would be other countries, is an open question.

&lt;i&gt;And now:&lt;/i&gt;
The estimated cost to US taxpayers of the Iraq war to date is &lt;a href=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2002780385_spending03.html&gt;$250 billion and rising, or $100,000 per minute.    Total cost of the Bush doctrine of spreading &quot;democracy&quot; since September 11th -- half a trillion dollars&lt;/a&gt;, or nearly the cost of the 13 years of the Vietnam War, adjusted for inflation.  What else could we have done with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&amp;b=171438&quot;&gt;that kind of money&lt;/a&gt;?  Also see &lt;a href=&quot;http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&amp;Itemid=182&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48846</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>DepartmentofDefense</category>
		<category>DoD</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Saddam</category>
		<category>taxpayers</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>Vietnam</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Stone Cold</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44513/Stone%2DCold</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050823/D8C5NH5G0.html"&gt;It&apos;s never too late to declare your support for Operation Iraqi Freedom.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44513</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:29:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>gravestones</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>OperationIraqiFreedom</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>PR</category>
		<category>publicrelations</category>
		<category>troops</category>
		<category>veterans</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bread and Circuses, 9/11 Style</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44181/Bread%2Dand%2DCircuses%2D911%2DStyle</link>
		<description> You can&apos;t make this stuff up:  Rumsfeld announces that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/story/335938p-286948c.html &quot;&gt;the Bush administration is planning to commemorate&lt;/a&gt; the fourth anniversary of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/911/911-serial.html&quot;&gt;9/11 attacks&lt;/a&gt; with an &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asyfreedomwalk.com/&quot;&gt;America Supports You freedom walk&lt;/a&gt;&quot; from the Pentagon saluting the troops   deployed in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5200741,00.html&quot;&gt;Operation Iraqi Freedom&lt;/a&gt;, followed by a show by &quot;country music superstar&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/12045303&quot;&gt;Clint Black&lt;/a&gt; at the National Mall. &lt;small&gt;(Not to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01-woiq.html&quot;&gt;imply&lt;/a&gt; that Saddam Hussein had anything to do with 9/11 or anything...)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44181</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:52:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>ClintBlack</category>
		<category>countrymusic</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>troops</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Well.  of course.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34236/Well%2Dof%2Dcourse</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/09/politics/campaign/09records.html"&gt;The dog ate my service records.&lt;/a&gt; The Pentagon has announced that the payroll records for National Guard service for three months between 1972 and 1973 have been accidentally destroyed.  These three months coincidentally cover the disputed period of George W. Bush&apos;s service in the Texas Air National Guard.  (Similar Google link &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=5627899&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/7/8/23589/81575&quot;&gt;dKos&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34236</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 05:00:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1972</category>
		<category>1973</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>coverup</category>
		<category>destroyed</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>NationalGuard</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>records</category>
		<category>service</category>
		<category>TexasAirNationalGuard</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Not SO Willing And The Not So Able Plus Postwar Window Closing in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27091/The%2DNot%2DSO%2DWilling%2DAnd%2DThe%2DNot%2DSo%2DAble%2DPlus%2DPostwar%2DWindow%2DClosing%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://publicbroadcasting.net/wnyc/news.newsmain?action=printarticle&amp;ARTICLE_ID=523426&quot; title=&quot;On March 1, Turkey upended Washington&apos;s battle plan by denying the use of Turkish land as a staging area for a northern front. That allowed an escape route for Hussein sympathizers to their traditional strongholds north of Baghdad, where the resistance since the war has been the worst. And on March 5, France, Russia and Germany pledged to oppose a U.N. resolution supporting the war, thwarting the administration&apos;s diplomatic plans. Until then, U.S. strategy was still based on winning U.N. endorsement to act against Iraq -- so the international community would play a larger role both during and after the war. Only days before the assault began, the United States realized it would have only a handful of allies to help it run postwar Iraq.&quot;&gt;Preparing for War, Stumbling to Peace&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;The Bush administration planned well and won the war with minimal allied casualties. Now, according to interviews with dozens of administration officials, military leaders and independent analysts, missteps in the planning for the subsequent peace could threaten the lives of soldiers and drain U.S. resources indefinitely and cloud the victory itself.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/18/international/18CND-GORDON.html?ex=1059192000&amp;en=4596e1cf9e7c2aee&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot; title=&quot;When the administration decided to invade Iraq to remove the Saddam Hussein regime, it adopted a new approach toward coalition-building. The administration wanted a free hand in determining when to go to war, what the plan of attack should be and what political process should be put in place in Iraq afterward to ensure that a new government was both democratic and friendly to the United States... Rather, the current Bush administration would call the shots, and like-minded nations -- the so-called coalition of the able and the willing -- could join in. That approach had the advantage of providing the United States with the maximum flexibility in overseeing the war. But the failure to build broad international backing for the effort also meant that there were relatively few allied forces to help shoulder the military and financial burdens of enforcing the peace. There is a long list of nations that may send forces, but many of the promised foreign deployments are small and largely symbolic. Now that the United States is involved in a messy occupation in Iraq, it has discovered that it is lonely at the top.&quot;&gt;Lonely At The Top&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said last week that he hoped to enlist as many as 30,000 troops from 49 nations. The problem, however, is that many of the recruits the Pentagon has tried to line up so far appear to fall into two categories: the not so willing and the not that able.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://reuters.com/printerFriendlyPopup.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=3105268&quot; title=&quot;About 146,000 U.S. troops are serving in postwar Iraq amid mounting security threats. The U.S. death toll of 147 combat deaths has now equaled the number killed in the 1991 Gulf War. National Guard soldiers would likely not be deployed until March or April after they complete two or three months of training, the paper said. Their lengths of service could last 12 to 16 months each including training.&quot;&gt;Report: U.S. May Call National Guard for Iraq Duty&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;The Pentagon could start a call-up of as many as 10,000 U.S. National Guard soldiers by this winter to bolster forces in Iraq and offset a lack of troops from allies, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8445-2003Jul17.html?nav=hptop_ts&amp;nav=hptop_ts&quot; title=&quot;While measured in tone and focused on 32 recommendations for rapidly improving conditions in Iraq, the report represents, in many respects, a critical assessment of the Bush administration&apos;s postwar plan. It implicitly faulted the administration for failing to adequately involve the international community and the United Nations in reconstruction activities. &apos;&apos;The scope of the challenges, the financial requirements, and rising anti-Americanism in parts of Iraq argue for a new coalition that includes countries and organizations beyond the original war fighting coalition,&apos;&apos; the report said. The report also noted that the administration, by vesting virtually all reconstruction authority in the Pentagon, chose a new model for postwar management that cut out many agencies more experienced in the field and relied on the Defense Department&apos;s &apos;&apos;relatively untested capacities.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;Postwar Window Closing in Iraq, Study Says&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;A team of outside experts dispatched by the Pentagon to assess security and reconstruction operations in Iraq reported yesterday that the window of opportunity for achieving postwar success is closing and requires immediate and dramatic action by U.S. military and civilian personnel.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.well.com/user/eob/poetry/The_Second_Coming.html&quot; title=&quot;Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all convictions, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. &quot;&gt;Turning and turning in the widening gyre...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27091</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>nationalguard</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14111/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/23/budget.ap/index.html"&gt;Bush Proposes to Add $48 Billion to Pentagon&apos;s Budget Next Year.&lt;/a&gt; Is this where all of this money should be going?  Personally, I would have liked to have seen Bush make good on his promise to help New York.  Besides, I&apos;ve already lived through the Eighties.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14111</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:33:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Budget</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<dc:creator>xammerboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9444/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/col/cona/2001/07/31/test/"&gt;NMD test rigged?&lt;/a&gt; Bashers, have at it...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9444</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 10:06:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>nationalmissiledefense</category>
		<category>nmd</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


