<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with pentagon and government</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/pentagon+government</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'pentagon' and 'government' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 13:01:47 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 13:01:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The First Casualty of War? Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61102/The%2DFirst%2DCasualty%2Dof%2DWar%2DTruth</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prwatch.org/node/6034"&gt;War vs. Democracy: Untold Stories from the Lynch / Tillman Hearing&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;i&gt;...U.S. soldiers whose injuries or deaths remain mired in secrecy. Pat Tillman&apos;s brother and fellow Army Ranger Kevin Tillman advocated strongly for other families still waiting for answers. ... &quot;The family was told, it was -- quote -- &apos;an ambush by insurgents.&apos; Two years later, they found out that those -- quote -- &apos;insurgents&apos; happened to be the same Iraqi troops that he was training. Before his death, he told his chain of command that these same troops that he was training were trying to kill him and his team. He was told to keep his mouth shut.&quot; ...&lt;/i&gt; Thorough and eye-opening examination of the many ways the military spun, lied, withheld information on soldier deaths and injuries for propaganda purposes (and even delayed action until cameras were present in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,82923,00.html&quot;&gt;Jessica Lynch&lt;/a&gt; rescue).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61102</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 13:01:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>heroes</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>often using &#8220;truth-based&#8221; information &#8212; to borrow from the vernacular of the military specialists who deal in the manipulation of words and images &#8212; as a substitute for truth.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51318/often%2Dusing%2D%3Ftruthbased%3F%2Dinformation%2Dto%2Dborrow%2Dfrom%2Dthe%2Dvernacular%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dmilitary%2Dspecialists%2Dwho%2Ddeal%2Din%2Dthe%2Dmanipulation%2Dof%2Dwords%2Dand%2Dimages%2Das%2Da%2Dsubstitute%2Dfor%2Dtruth</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cjr.org/issues/2006/3/schulman.asp"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Their view is that psyops can be directed toward global transregional audiences.&lt;/a&gt; My view is that that&#8217;s not possible because it directs psyops against our own friends and allies and even at our own public. ...&lt;/i&gt; In Mind Games, Columbia Journalism Review thoroughly examines the disintegrating lines between Public Affairs, Psy-Ops, IO, the public, and the truth. Some old friends are mentioned too: the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47118&quot;&gt; Lincoln Group&lt;/a&gt;, the&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46819&quot;&gt; Rendon Group, &lt;/a&gt; the Pentagon, our own media, and others. &lt;i&gt;If truth is our greatest weapon, as Rumsfeld has said, how can the administration hope to prevail in an information war when it is not honest with itself?&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51318</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:53:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>fact</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>opinion</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>press</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>psyops</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>truth</category>
		<category>truthiness</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Pravda</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30355/Pravda</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slate.msn.com/id/2092950/"&gt;Who&apos;s Afraid of a Little Propaganda?&lt;/a&gt; The Pentagon decides to bypass the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ap.org/&quot;&gt;filter&lt;/a&gt; and give Americans &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.agitproperties.com/osc/eshop/images/AGT003r.jpg&quot;&gt;direct news access&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30355</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:04:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<dc:creator>the fire you left me</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Not SO Willing And The Not So Able Plus Postwar Window Closing in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27091/The%2DNot%2DSO%2DWilling%2DAnd%2DThe%2DNot%2DSo%2DAble%2DPlus%2DPostwar%2DWindow%2DClosing%2Din%2DIraq</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://publicbroadcasting.net/wnyc/news.newsmain?action=printarticle&amp;ARTICLE_ID=523426&quot; title=&quot;On March 1, Turkey upended Washington&apos;s battle plan by denying the use of Turkish land as a staging area for a northern front. That allowed an escape route for Hussein sympathizers to their traditional strongholds north of Baghdad, where the resistance since the war has been the worst. And on March 5, France, Russia and Germany pledged to oppose a U.N. resolution supporting the war, thwarting the administration&apos;s diplomatic plans. Until then, U.S. strategy was still based on winning U.N. endorsement to act against Iraq -- so the international community would play a larger role both during and after the war. Only days before the assault began, the United States realized it would have only a handful of allies to help it run postwar Iraq.&quot;&gt;Preparing for War, Stumbling to Peace&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;The Bush administration planned well and won the war with minimal allied casualties. Now, according to interviews with dozens of administration officials, military leaders and independent analysts, missteps in the planning for the subsequent peace could threaten the lives of soldiers and drain U.S. resources indefinitely and cloud the victory itself.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/18/international/18CND-GORDON.html?ex=1059192000&amp;en=4596e1cf9e7c2aee&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE&quot; title=&quot;When the administration decided to invade Iraq to remove the Saddam Hussein regime, it adopted a new approach toward coalition-building. The administration wanted a free hand in determining when to go to war, what the plan of attack should be and what political process should be put in place in Iraq afterward to ensure that a new government was both democratic and friendly to the United States... Rather, the current Bush administration would call the shots, and like-minded nations -- the so-called coalition of the able and the willing -- could join in. That approach had the advantage of providing the United States with the maximum flexibility in overseeing the war. But the failure to build broad international backing for the effort also meant that there were relatively few allied forces to help shoulder the military and financial burdens of enforcing the peace. There is a long list of nations that may send forces, but many of the promised foreign deployments are small and largely symbolic. Now that the United States is involved in a messy occupation in Iraq, it has discovered that it is lonely at the top.&quot;&gt;Lonely At The Top&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said last week that he hoped to enlist as many as 30,000 troops from 49 nations. The problem, however, is that many of the recruits the Pentagon has tried to line up so far appear to fall into two categories: the not so willing and the not that able.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://reuters.com/printerFriendlyPopup.jhtml?type=topNews&amp;storyID=3105268&quot; title=&quot;About 146,000 U.S. troops are serving in postwar Iraq amid mounting security threats. The U.S. death toll of 147 combat deaths has now equaled the number killed in the 1991 Gulf War. National Guard soldiers would likely not be deployed until March or April after they complete two or three months of training, the paper said. Their lengths of service could last 12 to 16 months each including training.&quot;&gt;Report: U.S. May Call National Guard for Iraq Duty&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;The Pentagon could start a call-up of as many as 10,000 U.S. National Guard soldiers by this winter to bolster forces in Iraq and offset a lack of troops from allies, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8445-2003Jul17.html?nav=hptop_ts&amp;nav=hptop_ts&quot; title=&quot;While measured in tone and focused on 32 recommendations for rapidly improving conditions in Iraq, the report represents, in many respects, a critical assessment of the Bush administration&apos;s postwar plan. It implicitly faulted the administration for failing to adequately involve the international community and the United Nations in reconstruction activities. &apos;&apos;The scope of the challenges, the financial requirements, and rising anti-Americanism in parts of Iraq argue for a new coalition that includes countries and organizations beyond the original war fighting coalition,&apos;&apos; the report said. The report also noted that the administration, by vesting virtually all reconstruction authority in the Pentagon, chose a new model for postwar management that cut out many agencies more experienced in the field and relied on the Defense Department&apos;s &apos;&apos;relatively untested capacities.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;Postwar Window Closing in Iraq, Study Says&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;A team of outside experts dispatched by the Pentagon to assess security and reconstruction operations in Iraq reported yesterday that the window of opportunity for achieving postwar success is closing and requires immediate and dramatic action by U.S. military and civilian personnel.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.well.com/user/eob/poetry/The_Second_Coming.html&quot; title=&quot;Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all convictions, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. &quot;&gt;Turning and turning in the widening gyre...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27091</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:05:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>nationalguard</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9794/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Guardian/0,4029,543821,00.html"&gt;Filmmakers let the Pentagon edit their scripts&lt;/a&gt; in exchange for rights to use government land and military equipment. Great article complete with hilarious &quot;military mind&quot; quotes.  Need more government/pop culture collusion? N&apos;SYNC is getting $800,000 in tax payer&apos;s money for an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hightimes.com/News/2001_08/sync.tpl&quot;&gt;anti-drug campaign.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9794</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>films</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>scripts</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9297/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/27/politics/27MISS.html"&gt;M.I.T. Physicist Says Pentagon Is Trying To Silence Him.&lt;/a&gt; (NYTimes, registration required) So, it appears that the Pentagon commissions a panel to &quot;review&quot; (&quot;refute&quot;?) a contrary assessment of antimissile technology, but when an unintended byproduct of that review is &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; criticism of said technology, they pull this little snow job? I guess we&apos;ve heard this song before, but it&apos;s still laughable. Interesting comment from the Brass: &quot;just because it is made public doesn&apos;t mean it&apos;s declassified.&quot; I guess he must mean &quot;authorized&quot;, because for my money, that&apos;s &lt;i&gt;exactly&lt;/i&gt; what it means.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9297</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2001 01:06:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>criticism</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>missile</category>
		<category>MIT</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>shield</category>
		<category>TheodorePostol</category>
		<dc:creator>topolino</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/5906/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/articles/hn/xml/01/02/19/010219hnnsa.xml?p=br&amp;amp;s=7"&gt;NSA has lost the techno war. It says.&lt;/a&gt; But do we believe them? Or is this merely intended to lull us into complacency?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.5906</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>it</category>
		<category>nsa</category>
		<category>pentagon</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>Steven Den Beste</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


