<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with perle</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/perle</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'perle' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:27:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:27:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Blaming Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56026/Blaming%2DBush</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/12/neocons200612?printable=true&amp;amp;currentPage=all"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Now&lt;/i&gt; they tell us.&lt;/a&gt; Neocon hindsight is 20/20. War architect &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Perle&quot;&gt;Richard Perle&lt;/a&gt; on invading Iraq, 2002: &quot;We have no time to lose, and I think the president understands that and it&apos;s probably taken too long already, but I don&apos;t think it&apos;ll be much longer... Support for Saddam, including within his military organization, will collapse at the first whiff of gunpowder.... Now, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/printable/transcript_saddam.html&quot;&gt;it isn&apos;t going to be over in 24 hours, but it isn&apos;t going to be months either&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; Four years later: &quot;If I had been delphic, and had seen where we are today, and people had said, &apos;Should we go into Iraq?,&apos; I think now I probably would have said, &apos;No, let&apos;s consider other strategies&apos;... Could we have managed that threat by means other than a direct military intervention? Well, maybe we could have.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56026</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:27:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>neocon</category>
		<category>Perle</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>Saddam</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>VanityFair</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>richard perle</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30050/richard%2Dperle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&amp;amp;c=StoryFT&amp;amp;cid=1069493745090&amp;amp;p=1012571727088"&gt;richard perle&lt;/a&gt; has been discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/24661&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/24180&quot;&gt;before&lt;/a&gt;, finds himself caught in his own web again. should this &lt;a href=&quot;http://info.jpost.com/C002/Supplements/Intifada/pics/pic_per.jpg&quot;&gt;man&lt;/a&gt; be allowed to remain on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Policy_Board_Advisory_Committee&quot;&gt;defense policy board&lt;/a&gt; arguably one of the most influential bodies of unelected citizens in the world?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30050</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 22:29:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>Perle</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RichardPerle</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Richard Perle resigns the Defense Policy Board chairmanship.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24661/Richard%2DPerle%2Dresigns%2Dthe%2DDefense%2DPolicy%2DBoard%2Dchairmanship</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/dailybriefing/story/0,12965,924728,00.html"&gt;Richard Perle resigns the Defense Policy Board chairmanship.&lt;/a&gt; Richard Perle, after being accused of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,918742,00.html&quot;&gt;profiteering&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://newyorker.com/printable/?fact/030317fa_fact&quot;&gt;conflict of interest&lt;/a&gt;, has resigned as chairman of the Defense Policy Board. Was this the real reason he resigned, or is the administration distancing itself from Perle due to his claims the Iraqis would be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benadorassociates.com/article/7&quot;&gt;&quot;dancing in the streets&quot;&lt;/a&gt; after a US invasion, his links to &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2069119/&quot;&gt;an advocate for invading Saudi Arabia&lt;/a&gt;, or perhaps his call in the British press to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,918764,00.html&quot;&gt;get rid of the UN&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;br&gt;
Don&apos;t start missing him yet, however. Perle will still remain on the Defense Policy board at Donald Rumsfeld&apos;s request.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24661</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:20:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>georgewbush</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>perle</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>richardperle</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>insomnia_lj</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


