, also called the "morning after pill" is an emergency contraceptive
. Some pharmacists have refused
to stock and fill the prescription, citing ethical reservations, causing the AMA to affirmatively state its support for the contraceptive
and urge pharmacists to sell it and for the FDA to allow over-the-counter distribution. A partial victory was achieved in 2006
to allow OTC dispensing without a doctor's note for those over 18 years of age.
However, some pharmacists continued
to refuse to fill the prescription, including the owners of Ralph's Thriftway pharmacy chain in Washington State in 2006, causing some to boycott the chain
. Ralph's was later found
by the Washington State Board of Pharmacy to have violated the state pharmacy code in so doing. Ralph's lawsuit to block the ruling
reached the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which has now ruled against the pharmacy chain, saying ALL pharmacists must stock and dispense the contraceptive. [more inside]
A new Texas bill
seeks to give pharmacists the right to object to dispensing emergency contraceptives. The bill was spurred by over a year's worth of debate about an incident in Denton
where a rape victim was denied a morning-after pill by a pharmacist at Eckerd's. Supporters say that pharmacists should be able to opt out of dispensing drugs that are used for abortions, but the opposition points out that the bill's definition of emergency contraceptives can be construed to include all birth control. Should pharmacists be allowed to morally object, or is this an anti-birth-control boondoggle?