<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with pharmacists</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/pharmacists</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'pharmacists' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:17:49 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:17:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>9th Circuit says Plan B is AOK</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83180/9th%2DCircuit%2Dsays%2DPlan%2DB%2Dis%2DAOK</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.go2planb.com/&quot;&gt;Plan B&lt;/a&gt;, also called the &quot;morning after pill&quot; is an &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_contraception&quot;&gt;emergency contraceptive&lt;/a&gt;.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/33413/Can-a-Pharmacist-Refuse-To-Dispense-Birth-Control&quot;&gt;Some pharmacists have refused&lt;/a&gt; to stock and fill the prescription, citing ethical reservations, causing the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/54202/No-Need-for-a-Plan-B-for-Plan-B&quot;&gt;AMA to affirmatively state its support for the contraceptive&lt;/a&gt; and urge pharmacists to sell it and for the FDA to allow over-the-counter distribution.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/54202/No-Need-for-a-Plan-B-for-Plan-B&quot;&gt;A partial victory was achieved in 2006&lt;/a&gt; to allow OTC dispensing without a doctor&apos;s note for those over 18 years of age.

However, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seattlepi.com/local/283106_planb30.html&quot;&gt;some pharmacists continued&lt;/a&gt; to refuse to fill the prescription, including the owners of Ralph&apos;s Thriftway pharmacy chain in Washington State in 2006, causing some to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.olywip.org/site/page/article/2006/08/02.html&quot;&gt;boycott the chain&lt;/a&gt;.  Ralph&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://olyblog.net/ralphs-pharmacy-found-violate-statute&quot;&gt;was later found&lt;/a&gt; by the Washington State Board of Pharmacy to have violated the state pharmacy code in so doing.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/78247.php&quot;&gt;Ralph&apos;s lawsuit to block the ruling&lt;/a&gt; reached the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which has now ruled against the pharmacy chain, saying &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-pill-ruling9-2009jul09,0,6469894.story&quot;&gt;ALL pharmacists must stock and dispense the contraceptive.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2009/07/08/07-36039.pdf&quot;&gt;From the ruling&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Any refusal to dispense -- regardless of whether it is motivated by religion, morals, conscience, ethics, discriminatory prejudices, or personal distaste for a patient -- violates the rules,&quot; the panel said.&lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83180</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:17:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>contraceptives</category>
		<category>emergencycontraception</category>
		<category>medicalethics</category>
		<category>pharmacists</category>
		<category>PlanB</category>
		<category>reproductiverights</category>
		<dc:creator>darkstar</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Moral boon or immoral boondoggle?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41169/Moral%2Dboon%2Dor%2Dimmoral%2Dboondoggle</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/79R/billtext/HB00016I.HTM"&gt;A new Texas bill&lt;/a&gt; seeks to give pharmacists the right to object to dispensing emergency contraceptives. The bill was spurred by over a year&apos;s worth of debate about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/02/03/pharmacy.protest.ap/&quot;&gt; an incident in Denton&lt;/a&gt; where a rape victim was denied a morning-after pill by a pharmacist at Eckerd&apos;s. Supporters say that pharmacists should be able to opt out of dispensing drugs that are used for abortions, but the opposition points out that the bill&apos;s definition of emergency contraceptives can be construed to include all birth control. Should pharmacists be allowed to morally object, or is this an anti-birth-control boondoggle?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41169</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:21:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>abortion</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>contraception</category>
		<category>contraceptives</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>pharmacists</category>
		<category>Texas</category>
		<dc:creator>rush</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


