<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with philosophy and Ethics</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/philosophy+Ethics</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'philosophy' and 'Ethics' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:46:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:46:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>I prefer to think of it as a &apos;trolley opportunity&apos;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85413/I%2Dprefer%2Dto%2Dthink%2Dof%2Dit%2Das%2Da%2Dtrolley%2Dopportunity</link>
		<description> Michael Sandel&apos;s &quot;Justice&quot; has long been one of the most popular courses at Harvard. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/26/arts/television/26sandel.html&quot;&gt;Now for the first time the class is being broadcast online&lt;/a&gt;. The site for &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://justiceharvard.org/&quot;&gt;Justice&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; &quot;Justice&quot; is a wide-ranging introduction to issues in normative ethics and political morality that aims to work as a kind of supplementary civic education: &quot;In a way, . . . the course [tries] to model what public discourse would be like if it were more morally ambitious than it is.&quot; The video series is an ambitious (and expensive) production, using multiple cameras to capture student discussion as well as Prof. Sandel&apos;s words. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85413</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:46:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>harvard</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>moral</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>sandel</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<category>webcast</category>
		<dc:creator>grobstein</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>X-Phi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79706/XPhi</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10638"&gt;Philosophy&#8217;s great experiment.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Philosophers used to combine conceptual reflections with practical experiment. The trendiest new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unc.edu/~knobe/ExperimentalPhilosophy.html&quot;&gt;branch&lt;/a&gt; of the discipline, known as &lt;a href=&quot;http://experimentalphilosophy.typepad.com/&quot;&gt;x-phi&lt;/a&gt;, wants to return to those days. Some philosophers don&#8217;t like it.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79706</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AppliedEthics</category>
		<category>Determinism</category>
		<category>Dualism</category>
		<category>Empiricism</category>
		<category>Ethics</category>
		<category>ExperimentalPhilosophy</category>
		<category>FreeWill</category>
		<category>Intuition</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>TrolleyOlogy</category>
		<category>XPhi</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Society upto speed?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/77257/Society%2Dupto%2Dspeed</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/456702a.html"&gt;Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy&lt;/a&gt; - a commentary in Nature that says, &quot;&lt;i&gt;we call for a presumption that mentally competent adults should be able to engage in cognitive enhancement using drugs&lt;/i&gt;&quot;. Farkesque debate &lt;a href=&quot;http://network.nature.com/groups/naturenewsandopinion/forum/topics/3503&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Some earlier related FPPs:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/69851/How-else-are-we-supposed-to-grade-all-these-papers&quot;&gt;&quot;By their drugs shall ye know them.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/31594/Big-heads-wobbling-on-wee-necks&quot;&gt;Nootropics (&quot;smart&quot; drugs)&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.77257</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:59:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adderall</category>
		<category>advocacy</category>
		<category>amphetamines</category>
		<category>cognitiveenhancement</category>
		<category>commentary</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>FDA</category>
		<category>medication</category>
		<category>nootropics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>ritalin</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>daksya</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Roger Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74540/Roger%2DWilliams</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://tnr.com/booksarts/story.html?id=511ec724-6299-4bf4-adf7-38059cff16ae"&gt;The First Founder:&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/DAVREL.html?show=catalogcopy&quot;&gt;American&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bdorsey1/41docs/31-wil.html&quot;&gt;Revolution&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://users.erols.com/igoddard/roger.htm&quot;&gt;Roger Williams&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/&quot;&gt;3quarksdaily&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74540</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:20:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CivilLiberties</category>
		<category>Ethics</category>
		<category>History</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Religion</category>
		<category>Theology</category>
		<category>Tolerance</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dignity and Bioethics</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72058/Dignity%2Dand%2DBioethics</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=d8731cf4-e87b-4d88-b7e7-f5059cd0bfbd"&gt;The Stupidity of Dignity: Conservative bioethics&apos; latest, most dangerous ploy.&lt;/a&gt; Steven Pinker reviews &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/human_dignity/index.html&quot;&gt;Human Dignity and Bioethics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, the latest report from the President&apos;s Council on Bioethics. dgaicun &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/72033/Is-eating-Ben-amp-Jerry-ethical#2127810&quot;&gt;posted Pinker&apos;s article&lt;/a&gt; in the Leon Kass vs. ice-cream thread, but I think it and the report deserve their own post. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72058</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bioethics</category>
		<category>Catholicism</category>
		<category>Christianity</category>
		<category>Conservatism</category>
		<category>DanielDennett</category>
		<category>Dignity</category>
		<category>Ethics</category>
		<category>Freedom</category>
		<category>Health</category>
		<category>LeonKass</category>
		<category>MarthaNussbaum</category>
		<category>Medicine</category>
		<category>Morality</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Politics</category>
		<category>Religion</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>StevenPinker</category>
		<category>Stupidity</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What is the meaning of this post?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70394/What%2Dis%2Dthe%2Dmeaning%2Dof%2Dthis%2Dpost</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.askphilosophers.org/"&gt;Ask a Philosopher.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.askphilosophers.org/question/672&quot;&gt;Is the sentence of death really a punishment?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.askphilosophers.org/question/1723&quot;&gt;How can we discern the difference of how we authentically &quot;feel&quot; as opposed to how we &quot;think&quot; we feel? &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.askphilosophers.org/question/2051&quot;&gt;If humans didn&apos;t exist, would animals still have rights?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70394</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:47:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>discussion</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>questions</category>
		<dc:creator>desjardins</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The psychology of the moral instinct</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68132/The%2Dpsychology%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dmoral%2Dinstinct</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/13/magazine/13Psychology-t.html?_r=2&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;ref=magazine&amp;amp;pagewanted=all&amp;amp;oref=slogin"&gt;The Moral Instinct.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Evolution has endowed us with ethical impulses. Do we know what to do with them?&quot; &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mahablog.com/&quot;&gt;The Mahablog&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68132</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:31:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Ethics</category>
		<category>Evolution</category>
		<category>Morality</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Beyond &quot;Immanuel Kant was a real pissant.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/63155/Beyond%2DImmanuel%2DKant%2Dwas%2Da%2Dreal%2Dpissant</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hkbu.edu.hk/~ppp/cpr/toc.html&quot;&gt;What can I know?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://philosophy.eserver.org/kant/critique-of-practical-reaso.txt&quot;&gt;What should I do?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16j/&quot;&gt;For what may I hope?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.63155</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:45:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aesthetics</category>
		<category>critiqueofjudgment</category>
		<category>critiqueofpracticalreason</category>
		<category>critiqueofpurereason</category>
		<category>epistemology</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>immanuelkant</category>
		<category>kant</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>philosophyofhistory</category>
		<category>philosophyofscience</category>
		<dc:creator>anotherpanacea</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Tanner Lectures on Human Values online library</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60618/The%2DTanner%2DLectures%2Don%2DHuman%2DValues%2Donline%2Dlibrary</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures.html"&gt;The Tanner Lectures on Human Values&lt;/a&gt; are all online for you to peruse.  The library consists of around 180 full text PDFs by a wide variety of authors -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/volume25/korsgaard_2005.pdf&quot;&gt;Christine Korsgaard&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/scalia97.pdf&quot;&gt;Antonin Scalia&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/Diamond_01.pdf&quot;&gt;Jared Diamond&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/rawls82.pdf&quot;&gt;John Rawls&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/volume25/dawkins_2005.pdf&quot;&gt;Richard Dawkins&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/volume25/deWaal_2005.pdf&quot;&gt;Frans de Waal&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/Wilson80.pdf&quot;&gt;E.O. Wilson&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/Fukuyama98.pdf&quot;&gt;Francis Fukuyama&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/45441/Beauty&quot;&gt;previously mentioned&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/scarry00.pdf&quot;&gt;Elaine Scarry&lt;/a&gt; among them. Lots of interesting reading to be... read.  &lt;small&gt;Navigation is to the left.  The collection is sorted alphabetically by author.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60618</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:57:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>humanvalues</category>
		<category>morals</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>SCIENCE!</category>
		<category>tannerlectures</category>
		<category>termitocentrism</category>
		<dc:creator>cog_nate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>melting wax</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43376/melting%2Dwax</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenewatlantis.com/archive/8/rubin.htm"&gt;Is Civilization Decaying?&lt;/a&gt; Will technological progress be accompanied by moral progress?  Notes on a 1923 debate between J. B. S. Haldane (&lt;a href=&quot;http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/Daedalus.html&quot;&gt;Daedalus&lt;/a&gt;) and Bertrand Russell (&lt;a href=&quot;http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/Icarus.html&quot;&gt;Icarus&lt;/a&gt;).  &lt;a href=&quot;http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/future.html&quot;&gt;&quot;&lt;/a&gt;As John Brunner pointed out in an article in the New Scientist in 1993, these two books ... inspired two generations of science fiction writers.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43376</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:00:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>haldane</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>russell</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Comments open; continually revised</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38322/Comments%2Dopen%2Dcontinually%2Drevised</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/selfmod.htm"&gt;The Ethics of Deep Self-Modification.&lt;/a&gt; What will happen when machines gain the ability to modify their own psychology?  Do we have a responsibility to step in?  What happens when we have the ability to modify &lt;em&gt;ourselves&lt;/em&gt;?  Philosopher &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/hometoc.htm&quot;&gt;Peter Suber&lt;/a&gt; has dedicated himself to issues of self-modification... not just in psychology, but also in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/psa/&quot;&gt;constitutional law&lt;/a&gt;.  Small wonder that this is the guy who invented &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/NomicFaq&quot;&gt;Nomic&lt;/a&gt;.  His site is littered with great stuff; he now is primarily involved with the open access movement.  Check out his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm&quot;&gt;open access primer&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/fosblog.html&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38322</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:45:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AI</category>
		<category>artificialintelligence</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>modification</category>
		<category>nomic</category>
		<category>openaccess</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Neuroethics</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31690/Neuroethics</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.carlzimmer.com/articles/2004/articles_2004_Morality.html"&gt;Whose life would you save?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=http://www.carlzimmer.com/author.html&gt;Carl Zimmer&lt;/a&gt; takes a look at the work of philospher-neuroscientist Joshua Greene in the emerging field of the neuroscience of ethics and morality (Leon Kass, &lt;a href=http://www.corante.com/loom/archives/002341.html&gt;take note&lt;/a&gt;.)  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=http://www.dynamist.com/weblog/&gt;Dynamist Blog&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31690</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:17:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bioethics</category>
		<category>ethics</category>
		<category>LeonKass</category>
		<category>Neuroethics</category>
		<category>Neurorealism</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


