<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with philosophy and mind</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/philosophy+mind</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'philosophy' and 'mind' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:25:20 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:25:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>X-Phi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/79706/XPhi</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10638"&gt;Philosophy&#8217;s great experiment.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Philosophers used to combine conceptual reflections with practical experiment. The trendiest new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unc.edu/~knobe/ExperimentalPhilosophy.html&quot;&gt;branch&lt;/a&gt; of the discipline, known as &lt;a href=&quot;http://experimentalphilosophy.typepad.com/&quot;&gt;x-phi&lt;/a&gt;, wants to return to those days. Some philosophers don&#8217;t like it.&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.79706</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AppliedEthics</category>
		<category>Determinism</category>
		<category>Dualism</category>
		<category>Empiricism</category>
		<category>Ethics</category>
		<category>ExperimentalPhilosophy</category>
		<category>FreeWill</category>
		<category>Intuition</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>TrolleyOlogy</category>
		<category>XPhi</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Extending the Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78320/Extending%2Dthe%2DMind</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2009/feb/15-how-google-is-making-us-smarter"&gt;How Google Is Making Us Smarter:&lt;/a&gt; Humans are &quot;natural-born cyborgs,&quot; and the Internet is our giant &lt;a href=&quot;http://consc.net/papers/extended.html&quot;&gt;&quot;extended mind.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78320</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:50:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Cognition</category>
		<category>Cyborg</category>
		<category>Evolution</category>
		<category>ExtendedMind</category>
		<category>Google</category>
		<category>Information</category>
		<category>Internet</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I Contain Multitudes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75965/I%2DContain%2DMultitudes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200811/multiple-personalities"&gt;First Person Plural.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;An evolving approach to the science of pleasure suggests that each of us contains multiple selves&#8212;all with different desires, and all fighting for control. If this is right, the pursuit of happiness becomes even trickier. Can one self bind another self if the two want different things? Are you always better off when a Good Self wins? And should outsiders, such as employers and policy makers, get into the fray?&quot; &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://buddhism.about.com/b/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75965</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Ego</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Personality</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Pleasure</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>Self</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dopamine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74066/Dopamine</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/08/a_new_state_of_mind.php"&gt;A New State of Mind.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;New research is linking &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine&quot;&gt;dopamine&lt;/a&gt; to complex social phenomena&lt;/a&gt; and changing neuroscience in the process.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74066</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:30:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Addiction</category>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Chemistry</category>
		<category>Cognition</category>
		<category>Dopamine</category>
		<category>Evolution</category>
		<category>fMRI</category>
		<category>Hyper-scanning</category>
		<category>Ideas</category>
		<category>Learning</category>
		<category>Loins</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neurons</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Neurotransmitters</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Prediction</category>
		<category>Psychology</category>
		<category>Rewards</category>
		<category>Smoking</category>
		<category>Society</category>
		<category>StockMarket</category>
		<category>TDRL</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nicod Lectures</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65975/Nicod%2DLectures</link>
		<description> Since 1993, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.institutnicod.org/index.html&quot;&gt;Institut Jean Nicod&lt;/a&gt; has awarded the annual &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Nicod_Prize&quot;&gt;Jean Nicod&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.institutnicod.org/conf.htm&quot;&gt;Prize&lt;/a&gt; to a leading philosopher or cognitive scientist for his or her work in the interdisciplinary study of the mind.  The recipient is expected to deliver a series of lectures.  The lecture series of this past year&apos;s winner, philosopher &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~stich/&quot;&gt;Stephen Stich&lt;/a&gt;, is entitled &lt;a href=&quot;http://semioweb.msh-paris.fr/AAR/974/liste_conf.asp&quot;&gt;&quot;Moral Theory Meets Cognitive Science: How Cognitive Science Can Transform Traditional Debates&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, and is now available online in video form.  Also available is the lecture series of the previous year&apos;s winner, evolutionary anthropologist &lt;a href=&quot;http://email.eva.mpg.de/~tomas/&quot;&gt;Michael Tomasello&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://semioweb.msh-paris.fr/AAR/686/liste_conf.asp?id=686&quot;&gt;&quot;Origins of Human Communication&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. The first Tomasello video is not of high quality, but the rest are fine.  Other talks associated with the Institut Jean Nicod are &lt;a href=&quot;http://semioweb.msh-paris.fr/AAR/174/liste_conf.asp?id=174&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://semioweb.msh-paris.fr/AAR/365/liste_conf.asp?id=365&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  The site hosting the Nicod lectures has a number of other interesting videos; the directory of lectures in English is &lt;a href=&quot;http://semioweb.msh-paris.fr/AAR/FR/EventsLanguage.asp?slang=en&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  (Lots of lectures on semiotics, it seems.) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65975</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:05:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cognitive</category>
		<category>cognitivescience</category>
		<category>cogsci</category>
		<category>jeannicod</category>
		<category>lectures</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>nicod</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>stich</category>
		<category>tomasello</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>To Read or Not to Read</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65863/To%2DRead%2Dor%2DNot%2Dto%2DRead</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://consc.net/mindpapers"&gt;MindPapers&lt;/a&gt; - David Chalmers organizes, streamlines and expands his &lt;a href=&quot;http://consc.net/online/&quot;&gt;collection of papers&lt;/a&gt; related to mind and neuroscience.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65863</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:11:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>resource</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Philosophy and Neuroscience</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65306/Philosophy%2Dand%2DNeuroscience</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.petemandik.com/philosophy/papers/brookmandik.pdf"&gt;The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement&lt;/a&gt; (PDF).  A paper by &lt;a href=&quot;http://http-server.carleton.ca/~abrook/&quot;&gt;Andrew Brook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petemandik.com/&quot;&gt;Pete Mandik&lt;/a&gt; on the relationship between neuroscience and philosophy.  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot;&gt;MindHacks&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;ABSTRACT: A movement dedicated to applying neuroscience to traditional philosophical problems and using philosophical methods to illuminate issues in neuroscience began about twenty-five years ago. Results in neuroscience have affected how we see traditional areas of philosophical concern such as perception, belief-formation, and consciousness. There is an interesting interaction between some of the distinctive features of neuroscience and important general issues in the philosophy of science. And recent neuroscience has thrown up a few conceptual issues that philosophers are perhaps best trained to deal with. After sketching the history of the movement, we explore the relationships between neuroscience and philosophy and introduce some of the specific issues that have arisen.&lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65306</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:05:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Victim of The Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60191/Victim%2Dof%2DThe%2DBrain</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/url?docid=8576072297424860224&amp;amp;esrc=sr3&amp;amp;ev=v&amp;amp;q=hofstadter&amp;amp;vidurl=http://video.google.com/videoplay%3Fdocid%3D8576072297424860224%26q%3Dhofstadter&amp;amp;usg=AL29H23QfEYjd60hmbjduaa8IvX"&gt;Victim of the Brain&lt;/a&gt; A &apos;docudrama&apos; about &lt;a href=&quot;http://geb.stenius.org/&quot;&gt;Godel, Escher and Bach&lt;/a&gt; author, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Hofstadter&quot;&gt;Douglas Hofstadter&lt;/a&gt;, and philosopher &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Dennett&quot;&gt;Dan Dennett&lt;/a&gt; produced in 1988.  I&apos;m not sure how to describe it, other than incredibly strange and fascinating.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60191</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:44:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>artificialintelligence</category>
		<category>bach</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>escher</category>
		<category>godel</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<dc:creator>empath</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nullity and Perspex Machines</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56810/Nullity%2Dand%2DPerspex%2DMachines</link>
		<description> Dr James Anderson, from the University of Reading&apos;s computer science department, claims to have defined what it means to divide by zero.  It&apos;s so simple, he claims, that he&apos;s even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2006/12/06/divide_zero_feature.shtml&quot;&gt;taught it to high school students&lt;/a&gt; [via Digg].   You just have to work with a new number he calls &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/features/divide_zero_sum.ram&quot;&gt;Nullity&lt;/a&gt; (RealPlayer video).   According to Anderson&apos;s site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookofparagon.com/ &quot;&gt;The Book of Paragon&lt;/a&gt;, the creation, innovation, or discovery of nullity is a step toward describing a &quot;perspective simplex, or  perspex [ . . . ]  a simple physical thing that is both a mind and a body.&quot;  Anderson claims that Nullity permits the definition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookofparagon.com/Mathematics/PerspexMachineVIII.pdf&quot;&gt;transreal arithmetic&lt;/a&gt; (pdf), a &quot;total arithmetic . . . with no arithmetical exceptions,&quot; thus removing what the fictional dialogue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bookofparagon.com/News/News_00002.htm&quot;&gt;No Zombies, Only Feelies?&lt;/a&gt; identifies as the &quot;homunculus problem&quot; in mathematics: the need for human intervention to sort out &quot;corner cases&quot; which are not defined.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56810</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:07:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>artificialintelligence</category>
		<category>batshitinsane</category>
		<category>divisionbyzero</category>
		<category>jamesanderson</category>
		<category>math</category>
		<category>mathematics</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>nullity</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>philosophyofmind</category>
		<category>zero</category>
		<dc:creator>treepour</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Would the Algorithm of Fugue end with A B C?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50810/Would%2Dthe%2DAlgorithm%2Dof%2DFugue%2Dend%2Dwith%2DA%2DB%2DC</link>
		<description> Douglas Hofstadter &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unc.edu/~mumukshu/gandhi/gandhi/hofstadter.htm&quot;&gt;says&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;&lt;i&gt;What troubles me is the notion that things that touch me at my deepest core -- pieces of music most of all, which I have always taken as direct soul-to-soul messages -- might be effectively produced by mechanisms thousands if not millions of times simpler than the intricate biological machinery that gives rise to a human soul.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;. That was prompted by his reception to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://arts.ucsc.edu/faculty/cope/mp3page.htm&quot;&gt;output&lt;/a&gt; of David Cope&apos;s project &lt;a href=&quot;http://arts.ucsc.edu/faculty/cope/experiments.htm&quot;&gt;Experiments in Musical Intelligence&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50810</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 04:35:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aesthetics</category>
		<category>AI</category>
		<category>classicalmusic</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>logic</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>pattern</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The concept of the Transhuman: human, the self, consciousness and their effects on the law</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47580/The%2Dconcept%2Dof%2Dthe%2DTranshuman%2Dhuman%2Dthe%2Dself%2Dconsciousness%2Dand%2Dtheir%2Deffects%2Don%2Dthe%2Dlaw</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.transhumanlaw.org/index.html"&gt;The first Transhuman Conference On the Law of Transhuman Persons:&lt;/a&gt; Whether or not you believe humans are set to evolve into gods, or AI is destined to achieve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.transhumanist.com/volume1/moravec.htm&quot;&gt;self-awareness&lt;/a&gt; the idea of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhuman&quot;&gt;Transhuman&lt;/a&gt; is a thought provoking concept. Philosophers have debated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/texts.html&quot;&gt;the nature of the self&lt;/a&gt;, of the human for millennia. Is it time to start drafting new laws to govern &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; possible sentient beings on this planet? or is it all just a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/jstrout/uploading/MUHomePage.html&quot;&gt;science&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=505&quot;&gt;fiction&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.granta.com/books/chapters/979&quot;&gt;a comfortable  humanist illusion&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47580</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:43:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>awareness</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>existence</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>humanism</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>reference</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>scifi sf</category>
		<category>self</category>
		<category>sf</category>
		<category>singularity</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>transhuman</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Online papers on consciousness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40125/Online%2Dpapers%2Don%2Dconsciousness</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://consc.net/online.html"&gt;Online papers on consciousness&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lccs.edu/~jsennett/iceman.htm&quot;&gt;androids&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scar.utoronto.ca/~seager/zombie.html&quot;&gt;zombies&lt;/a&gt;, compiled by &lt;a href=&quot;http://fragments.consc.net/&quot;&gt;David Chalmers&lt;/a&gt;.  Need a primer before you jump into the heavy stuff?  See his &lt;a href=&quot;http://consc.net/guide.html&quot;&gt;Guide to the Philosophy of Mind&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;[via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidchess.com/words/log.html&quot;&gt;The Curvature of the Earth is Overwhelmed by Local Noise&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40125</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:28:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bibliography</category>
		<category>chalmers</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>davidchalmers</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<dc:creator>DevilsAdvocate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Semantic web : Lost in Translation</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29450/Semantic%2Dweb%2DLost%2Din%2DTranslation</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.shirky.com/writings/semantic_syllogism.html"&gt;Clay Shirky smacks syllogism around.&lt;/a&gt; Nice criticism of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3c.org/2001/sw/&quot;&gt;semantic web&lt;/a&gt; and the present (and increasing) hype of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2000/01/ala2349/all&quot;&gt;&quot;semantic web revolution&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. The most damning part of the essay is the part about languages and categories being deeply intertwined with worldview and with culture&#8212;if there&apos;s no good definition for the word &lt;i&gt;&quot;bachelor&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.d.umn.edu/~dcole/bachelor.htm&quot;&gt;see&lt;/a&gt;), how can there be an encoding of &lt;i&gt;&quot;friend&quot;&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;&quot;lover&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (see article for the classic AI example of &lt;i&gt;&quot;John loves Mary&quot;&lt;/i&gt;) or anything else that isn&apos;t zipcode?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29450</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 06:59:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>linguistics</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>semantics</category>
		<category>semanticweb</category>
		<dc:creator>zpousman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Mind &amp;amp; Body: Antonio Damasio on Descartes and Spinoza</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25229/Mind%2Dand%2DBody%2DAntonio%2DDamasio%2Don%2DDescartes%2Dand%2DSpinoza</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/19/arts/19EMOT.html?ei=5062&amp;en=b979059d9665d5cb&amp;ex=1051329600&amp;partner=GOOGLE&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot; title=&quot;But by the early 20th century, science had fallen sway to behaviorism and affect was off limits. Human beings, it was thought, could be understood purely by observing what they did. Internal mental states were dismissed as irrelevant. As Dr. Damasio put it, &apos;&apos;Neuroscience gave the cold shoulder to emotion.&apos;&apos; Feelings, he said, were considered &apos;&apos;elusive, indescribable, too subjective.&apos;&apos; When Dr. Damasio began to study affect in the late 1980&apos;s, it was by accident, not design. Dr. Damasio and his wife, Hanna Damasio, also a neurologist, became professors at the University of Iowa, where he acquired a reputation as an authority on language, memory and Alzheimer&apos;s disease. But it was his work with brain-damaged patients with impaired decision-making skills that led him to wonder about emotions.&apos;&apos;I was forced to think about emotions because of those patients with frontal lobe damage,&apos;&apos; Dr. Damasio said. &apos;&apos;They had incredible problems with social behavior that had normally been attributed only to cognitive disturbances. I was very struck by the fact that they had clear disturbances of emotion. I started thinking that emotions might play a role in making decisions and choices in a normal way.&apos;&apos;&quot;&gt;I Feel, Therefore I Am&lt;/a&gt;. Consider the work of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~philos/MindDict/damasio.html&quot; title=&quot;Antonio Damasio: Dictionary of Philosophy of Mind entry&quot;&gt;Dr.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://hcs.harvard.edu/~husn/BRAIN/vol8-spring2001/damasio.htm&quot; title=&quot;An Interview with Antonio R. Damasio&quot;&gt;Antonio&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://realserver.bu.edu:8080/ramgen/w/b/wbur/connection/audio/2000/10/con_1012b.rm&quot; title=&quot;From NPR&apos;s The Connection, a recording of Antonio Damasio on Consciousness and Emotion: Exploring the role of emotion and subjectivity in consciousness&quot;&gt;Damasio&lt;/a&gt;, humanist and neuroscientist, who has turned the &lt;a href=&quot;http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/writing/mind-top.html&quot; title=&quot;The Mind Body Problem&quot;&gt;Mind and Body&lt;/a&gt; debate between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philosophypages.com/ph/desc.htm#links&quot; title=&quot;After receiving a sound education in mathematics, classics, and law at La Fl&amp;#0232;che and Poitiers, Ren&amp;#0233; Descartes embarked on a brief career in military service with Prince Maurice in Holland and Bavaria. Unsatisfied with scholastic philosophy and troubled by skepticism of the sort expounded by Montaigne, Descartes soon conceived a comprehensive plan for applying mathematical methods in order to achieve perfect certainty in human knowledge. During a twenty-year period of secluded life in Holland, he produced the body of work that secured his philosophical reputation. Descartes moved to Sweden in 1649, but did not survive his first winter.&quot;&gt;Ren&amp;#0233;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exhibitions/Mind/Descartes.html&quot; title=&quot;Mind and Body: Ren&amp;#0233; Descartes to William James&quot;&gt;Descartes&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://rwmeijer.ws/spinoza&quot; title=&quot;The Philosophy of Benedictus de Spinoza (1632-1677)&quot;&gt;Benedictus &lt;a href=&quot;http://home.pi.be/~pin86315/spinoza/essay2.htm&quot; title=&quot;Spinoza&#8217;s Ethica A systematical presentation of the emotions (affectus)&quot;&gt;de&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trinity.edu/cbrown/modern/litrev/Spinoza-mindbody.html&quot; title=&quot;Spinoza on Mind and Body - Rachel Florence&quot;&gt;Spinoza&lt;/a&gt; upon its head--or at least the heads of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deakin.edu.au/hbs/GAGEPAGE/Pgstory.htm&quot; title=&quot;Phineas Gage&#8217;s Story&quot;&gt;Phineas Gage&lt;/a&gt; and one &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gustavus.edu/oncampus/academics/philosophy/kaaren.html&quot; title=&quot;Emotions and Social Intelligence: Jane Braaten and Antonio Damasio&quot;&gt;Elliott&lt;/a&gt;--via his research and writings such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-10-mosca.html&quot; title=&quot;A Review Essay on Antonio Damasio&apos;s The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness.&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cix.co.uk/~acampbell/bookreviews/r/damasio.html&quot; title=&quot;Anthony Campbell reviews Antonio Damasio Descartes Error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Descartes&apos; Error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.curledup.com/spinoza.htm&quot; title=&quot;Of the tremendous scientific revolutions in the past hundred years, in understanding the physical structure of reality, the genetic basis of humanity, and the history of the universe, understanding how the mind rules us is only now coming to the fore. Dr. Antonio Damasio, Professor and head of the department of neurology at the University of Iowa Medical Center, has published the third in his series of books that attempts to popularize key parts of that breakthrough. Looking for Spinoza continues his exposition of the overwhelming role of emotion in life and, exploiting the intuitive understandings of the seventeenth-century philosopher named in the title, hypothesizes how biology might link to ethics and a desirable lifestyle. &quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. He&apos;s influenced writers like &lt;a href=&quot;http://query.nytimes.com/search/full-page?res=9405E5D81231F933A25750C0A9649C8B63&quot; title=&quot;Atonement - Ian McEwan&quot;&gt;Ian&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4257871,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Only love and then oblivion. Love was all they had to set against their murderers &quot;&gt;McEwan&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4537260,00.html&quot; title=&quot;Sense and sensibility - David Lodge&quot;&gt;David Lodge&lt;/a&gt;, and via his thoughts on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.music-cog.ohio-state.edu/Music829D/Notes/Descartes.html&quot; title=&quot;Music and Emotion - Notes on Antonio Damasio&quot;&gt;perception of music&lt;/a&gt;, inspired &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proarte.org/notes/adolphe.htm&quot; title=&quot;Body Loops, for piano and orchestra By Bruce Adolphe &quot;&gt;a composition&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;i&gt;(More Inside)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25229</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:25:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antoniodamasio</category>
		<category>benedictusdespinoza</category>
		<category>body</category>
		<category>damasio</category>
		<category>descartes</category>
		<category>emotion</category>
		<category>feelings</category>
		<category>gage</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>mindbodyproblem</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>phineasgage</category>
		<category>renedescartes</category>
		<category>spinoza</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


