<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with philosophy</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/philosophy/rss</link>
	<description>tag posts with philosophy</description>
		  <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:58:30 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:58:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Virtual Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73484/Virtual-Thinking</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/06/the_google_way.php"&gt;Correlative Analytics&lt;/a&gt; -- or as O&apos;Reilly might term the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_11.html#oreilly&quot;&gt;Social Graph&lt;/a&gt; -- sort of mirrors the debate on &apos;brute force&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-assisted_proof&quot;&gt;algorithmic proofs&lt;/a&gt; (that are &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cs.umaine.edu/~chaitin/summer.html&quot;&gt;true for no reason&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=25422&amp;cid=2761967&quot;&gt;cf&lt;/a&gt;.) in which &quot;computers can extract patterns in this ocean of data that no human could ever possibly detect. These patterns are correlations. They may or may not be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/thesis/&quot;&gt;causative&lt;/a&gt;, but we can learn new things. Therefore they accomplish what science does, although not in the traditional manner... In this part of science, we may get answers that work, but which we don&apos;t understand. Is this partial understanding? Or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.erasmatazz.com/library/History%20of%20Thinking/CoreArgument.html&quot;&gt;a different kind&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2003/12/Superhumanintelligence.shtml&quot;&gt;understanding&lt;/a&gt;?&quot; Of course, say some in the scientific community: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bactra.org/weblog/581.html&quot;&gt;hogwash&lt;/a&gt;; it&apos;s just a fabrication of scientifically/statistically illiterate pundits, like whilst new techniques in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-02/bu-bmp022808.php&quot;&gt;data analysis&lt;/a&gt; are being developed to help keep ahead of the deluge...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73484</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:58:30 -0800</pubDate>

<category>math</category>

<category>philosophy</category>

<category>research</category>

<category>science</category>

<dc:creator>kliuless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Word Nerds</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72304/Word-Nerds</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/andsometimesy/pastshows.html?s3-ep10&quot;&gt;Silence!&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;It&apos;s the opposite of speech. But that doesn&apos;t mean it communicates nothing.&lt;/em&gt; A show about the English language, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/andsometimesy/pastshows.html&quot;&gt;And Sometimes Y&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; was broadcast on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/radio/&quot;&gt;CBC Radio&lt;/a&gt; One through December of 2007. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbc.ca/listen/index.html#&quot;&gt;Live internet broadcast&lt;/a&gt; for: Radio One (news and features) | Radio 2 (music) </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72304</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:07:13 -0800</pubDate>

<category>wordsmith</category>

<category>linguistics</category>

<category>philosophy</category>

<dc:creator>sluglicker</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72280/Reality</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/06/the_reality_tests_1.php"&gt;The Reality Tests.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;A &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quantum.at/&quot;&gt;team of physicists&lt;/a&gt; in Vienna has devised experiments that may answer one of the enduring riddles of science: Do we create the world just by looking at it?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72280</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:40:09 -0800</pubDate>

<category>Mathematics</category>

<category>Philosophy</category>

<category>Physics</category>

<category>QuantumMechanics</category>

<category>QuantumOptics</category>

<category>Realism</category>

<category>Science</category>

<category>Solipsism</category>

<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dignity and Bioethics</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72058/Dignity-and-Bioethics</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=d8731cf4-e87b-4d88-b7e7-f5059cd0bfbd"&gt;The Stupidity of Dignity: Conservative bioethics' latest, most dangerous ploy.&lt;/a&gt; Steven Pinker reviews &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/human_dignity/index.html&quot;&gt;Human Dignity and Bioethics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, the latest report from the President&apos;s Council on Bioethics. dgaicun &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/72033/Is-eating-Ben-amp-Jerry-ethical#2127810&quot;&gt;posted Pinker&apos;s article&lt;/a&gt; in the Leon Kass vs. ice-cream thread, but I think it and the report deserve their own post. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72058</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:35:43 -0800</pubDate>

<category>Bioethics</category>

<category>Catholicism</category>

<category>Christianity</category>

<category>Conservatism</category>

<category>Dignity</category>

<category>Freedom</category>

<category>Ethics</category>

<category>Health</category>

<category>Medicine</category>

<category>Morality</category>

<category>Philosophy</category>

<category>Politics</category>

<category>Religion</category>

<category>Science</category>

<category>Stupidity</category>

<category>DanielDennett</category>

<category>LeonKass</category>

<category>MarthaNussbaum</category>

<category>StevenPinker</category>

<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71698/The-Internet-Encyclopedia-of-Philosophy</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.iep.utm.edu/"&gt;The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy&lt;/a&gt; is an excellent resource for matters philosophical. There you can be enlightened on such diverse subjects as paradoxes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/f/fict-par.htm&quot;&gt;existential&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/par-russ.htm&quot;&gt;logical&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/pyrrho.htm&quot;&gt;Greek&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/PeirceBi.htm&quot;&gt;American&lt;/a&gt; philosophers obscure to the wider world, philosophers whose names have resounded through the ages, both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/plato.htm&quot;&gt;well-attested&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/pythagor.htm&quot;&gt;possibly mythical&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/pudgalav.htm&quot;&gt;Buddhist thought&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/panpsych.htm&quot;&gt;Western mysticism&lt;/a&gt; and definitions of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/property.htm&quot;&gt;thorny&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/person-i.htm&quot;&gt;difficult&lt;/a&gt; concepts. And that&apos;s just a small sampling of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/&quot;&gt;letter P section&lt;/a&gt;. All articles are written by specialists on the subject and the editors of the IEP are all academic philosophers. The encyclopedia is far from complete, so if you think you can help out, they have a list of their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/1/desired.htm&quot;&gt;100 most desired articles&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71698</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:42:40 -0800</pubDate>

<category>philosophy</category>

<category>encyclopedia</category>

<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>}i~ek!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71598/}i~ek</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P91azQ9ofGI"&gt;"}i~ek!"&lt;/a&gt; is a feature &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zizekthemovie.com/&quot;&gt;documentary&lt;/a&gt; exploring the eccentric personality and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lacan.com/frameziz.htm&quot;&gt;esoteric work&lt;/a&gt; of the &quot;wild man of theory&quot;: the eminent Slovenian philosopher &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavoj_Zizek&quot;&gt;Slavoj&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iep.utm.edu/z/zizek.htm&quot;&gt;&#381;i&#382;ek&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuTOoSMlQNI&quot;&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ML7fX3iE3w&quot;&gt;Part 3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mTlYe3_2WM&quot;&gt;Part 4&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk3iZngXIUU&quot;&gt;Part 5&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpvpOCEXtCY&quot;&gt;Part 6&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf1YfC8FKf8&quot;&gt;Part 7&lt;/a&gt;. Democracy Now! did a two-part interview with &#381;i&#382;ek which concluded today: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/2008/3/11/everybody_in_the_world_except_us&quot;&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democracynow.org/2008/5/12/world_renowned_philosopher_slavoj_zizek_on&quot;&gt;Part 2&lt;/a&gt;.

His &lt;a href=&quot;http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/the_tls/article3800980.ece&quot;&gt;latest book&lt;/a&gt; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1844671089/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;&quot;In Defense of Lost Causes&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.

&#381;i&#382;ek was previsouly discussed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/49967/Slavoj-Zizek&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/54680/On-911-New-Yorkers-faced-the-fire-in-the-minds-of-men&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71598</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:00:20 -0800</pubDate>

<category>Capitalism</category>

<category>Culture</category>

<category>Marxism</category>

<category>Philosophy</category>

<category>Psychoanalysis</category>

<category>Sociology</category>

<category>Theory</category>

<category>Zizek</category>

<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Jerry Fodor, on Why Pigs Don&apos;t Have Wings</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71424/Jerry-Fodor-on-Why-Pigs-Dont-Have-Wings</link>
		<description>
		Rutgers professor of philosophy Jerry Fodor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n20/fodo01_.html&quot;&gt;created a bit of a stir&lt;/a&gt; last October when he wrote an article for the London Review of Books arguing that natural selection may not be such a great theory after all, and that a &quot;major revision of evolutionary theory... is in the offing.&quot; Not many fellow &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n21/letters.html#letter1&quot;&gt;philosophers&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n22/letters.html#letter6&quot;&gt;and &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/evolutionblog/2007/10/fodor_on_natural_selection.php&quot;&gt;academics &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n01/letters.html#letter5&quot;&gt;agree&lt;/a&gt;, it seems. Fodor responds to his critics &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n23/letters.html#letter3&quot;&gt;here &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n01/letters.html#letter6&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Six months later, it&apos;s still not entirely clear whether his argument is, as Justin E.H. Smith &lt;a href=&quot;http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2008/04/even-tierra-del.html&quot;&gt;put it&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;irresponsible and stupid or so subtle that none of his adversaries, defending a status quo interpretation of the theory of natural selection, have been able to get it yet.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71424</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:08:55 -0800</pubDate>

<category>evolution</category>

<category>naturalselection</category>

<category>biology</category>

<category>philosophy</category>

<category>fodor</category>

<category>darwinism</category>

<dc:creator>decoherence</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Shakespeare and philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71411/Shakespeare-and-philosophy</link>
		<description>
		Martha Nussbaum &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=e1bd6ffa-c648-4d40-8efd-40dd1b31b444&amp;p=1&quot;&gt;reviews&lt;/a&gt; three recent books on Shakespeare and philosophy.  The essay offers an excellent analysis of love in &lt;em&gt;Antony and Cleopatra&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Othello&lt;/em&gt;, and an excellent discussion of the interaction between philosophy and literature. From the essay: &lt;em&gt;&quot;To make any contribution worth caring about, a philosopher&apos;s study of Shakespeare should do three things. First and most centrally, it should really do philosophy, and not just allude to familiar philosophical ideas and positions. It should pursue tough questions and come up with something interesting and subtle--rather than just connecting Shakespeare to this or that idea from Philosophy 101. A philosopher reading Shakespeare should wonder, and ponder, in a genuinely philosophical way. Second, it should illuminate the world of the plays, attending closely enough to language and to texture that the interpretation changes the way we see the work, rather than just uses the work as grist for some argumentative mill. And finally, such a study should offer some account of why philosophical thinking needs to turn to Shakespeare&apos;s plays, or to works like them. Why must the philosopher care about these plays? Do they supply to thought something that a straightforward piece of philosophical prose cannot supply, and if so, what?&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

There is some discussion of the piece &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/nussbaum_on_philosophy_does_shakespeare/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71411</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:38:38 -0800</pubDate>

<category>shakespeare</category>

<category>philosophy</category>

<category>literature</category>

<category>literary</category>

<category>criticism</category>

<category>art</category>

<category>review</category>

<category>bookreview</category>

<category>nussbaum</category>

<category>othello</category>

<category>antony</category>

<category>cleopatra</category>

<category>cavell</category>

<dc:creator>painquale</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>We should seek the truth without hesitation!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71045/We-should-seek-the-truth-without-hesitation</link>
		<description>
		&lt;i&gt;Why do we spend so many precious hours of our lives watching films? What is it about cinema that it should occupy a place of such prominence in our lives? And why do we even need movies? It is as though we are trying to fill a gap in our lives - a void, an emptiness within ourselves. So to even begin on the path of our Truth Quest, we have to see the broader picture of how film correlates to life, and life to film. To find this higher perspective, it is helpful to look towards the other arts, as well as philosophy.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cinemaseekers.com/HOME.html&quot; title=&quot;We should seek the truth without hesitation; and, if we refuse it, we show that we value the esteem of men more than the search for truth. -- Blaise Pascal&quot;&gt;Cinema Seekers&lt;/a&gt;: Searching for truth in cinema and in life. Above excerpt from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cinemaseekers.com/Nietzsche.html&quot; title=&quot;CINEMA IN THE END TIME: MOVIES, MUSIC, PHILOSOPHY AND THE APOCALYPSE&quot;&gt;Dies Irae&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;The site is a little overwhelming.  Here&apos;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cinemaseekers.com/Hometext.html&quot; title=&quot;Cinema Seekers: text only edition&quot;&gt;text only&lt;/a&gt; version. If the Web 1.0 design doesn&apos;t bother, I recommend starting with &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cinemaseekers.com/honor_roll.html&quot; title=&quot;The Honor Roll: 400 of the World&apos;s Greatest ART Films (from a spiritual perspective)&quot;&gt;The Honor Roll: 400 of the World&apos;s Greatest ART Films (from a spiritual perspective)&lt;/a&gt;, a nice way to browse the essays on particular films and/or directors. &lt;br&gt;The Cinema Seekers, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cinemaseekers.com/return/RTL2/index.html&quot; title=&quot;About the directors...&quot;&gt;Gregory and Maria&lt;/a&gt;, are inspired by and draw their philosophy from the wisdom of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cinemaseekers.com/Christ/Abdrushin.html&quot; title=&quot;Abd-ru-shin biography&quot;&gt;Abd-ru-shin&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Ernst_Bernhardt&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia on Oskar Ernst Bernhardt AKA Abd-ru-shin&quot;&gt;Oskar Ernst Bernhardt&lt;/a&gt;), distilled in his book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.poznanie.sk/in-the-light-of-truth/&quot; title=&quot;online version of In the Light of Truth: The Grail Message&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;In the Light of Truth: The Grail Message&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. They&apos;ve interpreted text from the book with a two-part (so far)  series &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Aga1SqdUkY&quot; title=&quot;From Cinema to Life Part I. Spirit: The Inner Essence of Man&quot;&gt;From Cinema to Life&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71045</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:49:07 -0800</pubDate>

<category>film</category>

<category>life</category>

<category>cinema</category>

<category>essays</category>

<category>philosophy</category>

<dc:creator>carsonb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Divine instruments for self learning</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70584/Divine-instruments-for-self-learning</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://lullianarts.net/"&gt;Mnemonic Arts of Blessed Raymond LULL&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70584</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:59:48 -0800</pubDate>

<category>Llull</category>

<category>Lull</category>

<category>Lully</category>

<category>mnemonics</category>

<category>logic</category>

<category>theology</category>

<category>philosophy</category>

<dc:creator>generalist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


