<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with pirating</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/pirating</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'pirating' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:42:34 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:42:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Meltdown at Fox over Wolverine review</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/80609/Meltdown%2Dat%2DFox%2Dover%2DWolverine%2Dreview</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.variety.com/VR1118002128.html"&gt;Internal drama at Fox:&lt;/a&gt; longtime Hollywood columnist Roger Friedman fired - &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Movies/story?id=7262112&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;or not?&lt;/a&gt; - for posting a review on FoxNews.com of 20th Century Fox&apos;s &quot;X-Men Origins: Wolverine,&quot; which leaked onto the internets April 1. He apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2009/04/roger_friedman_loves_wolverine.html&quot;&gt;liked it. &lt;/a&gt; But Fox is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/and-it-makes-you-age-20-years-overnight/&quot;&gt;freaking out&lt;/a&gt; about the leak, more than a month before the theatre premiere, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/04/fox-threatens-over-wolverine-leak-fbi-raids-data-center.ars&quot;&gt;the FBI has conducted raids&lt;/a&gt;. Speculation about what happened &lt;a href=&quot;http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2009/04/so_who_exactly_are_the_main_su.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.80609</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:42:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>fox</category>
		<category>foxnews</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>wolverine</category>
		<category>xmen</category>
		<dc:creator>CunningLinguist</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Can&apos;t pirate, the IP Czar will eat me</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75654/Cant%2Dpirate%2Dthe%2DIP%2DCzar%2Dwill%2Deat%2Dme</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN03325:@@@L&amp;amp;summ2=m&amp;amp;"&gt;The Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO-IP) Act&lt;/a&gt; has added a whole other dimension to the term &quot;copyright infringement.&quot;  Sponsored by the US entertainment industry, it allows seizure of assets &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; the accused is found guilty and the creation of a new executive branch led by an &quot;Intellectual Property Czar&quot; who would report directly to the President on IP crimes--similar to the Drug Czar of the War on Drugs.  Financial penalties for copyright crimes have increased dramatically.  More information &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95702932&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and a summary of critiques &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080205-white-paper-pro-ip-acts-damage-increases-are-dangerous.html&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;  Is this a useful addition to the War On Copyright Infringement or just more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=95697760&quot;&gt;bureaucratic red tape&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75654</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>copyrightinfringement</category>
		<category>intellectualproperty</category>
		<category>ip</category>
		<category>ipczar</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>schroedinger</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Coelho gives out pirate copies of books... reaps benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/68501/Coelho%2Dgives%2Dout%2Dpirate%2Dcopies%2Dof%2Dbooks%2Dreaps%2Dbenefits</link>
		<description> Author Paulo Coelho &lt;a href=&quot;http://torrentfreak.com/alchemist-author-pirates-own-books-080124/&quot;&gt;talks about&lt;/a&gt; how creating &lt;a href=&quot;http://piratecoelho.wordpress.com/&quot;&gt;The Pirate Coelho&lt;/a&gt;, a site with links to torrents of his own books, leads to a massive increase in sales.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.68501</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:16:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>author</category>
		<category>bittorrent</category>
		<category>paulocoelho</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>torrents</category>
		<dc:creator>dobbs</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Doesn&apos;t matter if you&apos;re a grandma, or a 7-year-old girl ...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/54148/Doesnt%2Dmatter%2Dif%2Dyoure%2Da%2Dgrandma%2Dor%2Da%2D7yearold%2Dgirl</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dontdownloadthissong.com"&gt;&quot;Don&apos;t Download This Song.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; A free, and rather hilarious, download from &quot;Weird Al&quot; Yankovic done in the &apos;charity gospel&apos; &quot;We are the World&quot; style, including a few gems in the lyrics like &quot;even Lars Ulrich knows it&apos;s wrong.&quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://dontdownloadthissong.com/tracks/DDTS.mp3&quot;&gt;Direct MP3 link&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.yahoo.com/premieres&quot;&gt;Music video&lt;/a&gt; evidently coming shortly.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.54148</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:59:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>al</category>
		<category>mpaa</category>
		<category>parody</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>riaa</category>
		<category>song</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<category>yankovic</category>
		<dc:creator>WCityMike</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>What would Jesus download?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32918/What%2Dwould%2DJesus%2Ddownload</link>
		<description> Holy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmta.com/brochure.htm&quot;&gt;illegal&lt;/a&gt; downloads, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bibleman.com/&quot;&gt;Bibleman&lt;/a&gt;!

Christian music fans are &lt;a href=&quot;http://greenvilleonline.com/news/2004/05/03/2004050330518.htm&quot;&gt;pirating songs&lt;/a&gt;, too!

What would Jesus &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmcentral.com/thechart/&quot;&gt;download&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32918</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2004 22:37:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>christian</category>
		<category>download</category>
		<category>downloading</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<dc:creator>wfrgms</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Europeans: Do you want a total war on piracy?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29055/Europeans%2DDo%2Dyou%2Dwant%2Da%2Dtotal%2Dwar%2Don%2Dpiracy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/20/business/worldbusiness/20lobby.html?ex=1067227200&amp;amp;en=8ec9a2bb65c245c9&amp;amp;ei=5062&amp;amp;partner=GOOGLE"&gt;Europe&apos;s not-too-modest anti-piracy proposal.&lt;/a&gt; If accepted, it means that &quot;not only could a teenager who downloaded a music file be sent to jail under it; so too could managers of the Internet service provider that the teenager happened to use, whether they knew what the teenager was doing or not.&quot; The proposal is being spearheaded by French parliamentarian Janelly Fourtou. Coincidentally enough, her husband is the chief executive of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vivendiuniversal.com/vu/en/home/index.cfm&quot; title=&quot;One of the world&apos;s largest record companies&quot;&gt;Vivendi Universal&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29055</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:33:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>EU</category>
		<category>Europe</category>
		<category>JanellyFourtou</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>VivendiUniversal</category>
		<dc:creator>Ljubljana</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>We know who you are. We know what you&apos;re doing.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25445/We%2Dknow%2Dwho%2Dyou%2Dare%2DWe%2Dknow%2Dwhat%2Dyoure%2Ddoing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1025-998825.html?tag=fd_top"&gt;Hi! You have the right to remain silent! (wanna cyber?)&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The RIAA, bastions of goodness and justice, are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,58670,00.html&quot;&gt;sending IMs to nasty file-sharers, telling them that what they&apos;re doing is naughty&lt;/a&gt;. And that they might just end up in court.
 &lt;br&gt;
A private company they&apos;re hiring plans to send a million messages per week, telling the thieving pirates that the RIAA knows where they live.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Looks like &quot;Hilary Rosen&quot; is one person I&apos;ll be putting on my ignore list.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25445</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:44:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>filesharing</category>
		<category>IM</category>
		<category>instant</category>
		<category>messages</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13670/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.chip.de/news_stories/news_stories_8635310.html"&gt;Copy protection for CDs does not have future&lt;/a&gt; says &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philips.com/&quot;&gt;Philips&lt;/a&gt;. Philips spokesperson Klaus Petri, speaking to Reuters, says its company counts on the fact that the refusal of consumers will convince the music industry to step back from copy-protected CD&apos;s. Petri said that Philips could sue the manufacturers of CD&apos;s with copy protection (as managers of the world-wide CD patents), because they would not correspond to the standards. &quot;those are silver disks with music on them, but which do not resemble CD&apos;s&quot;. [via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=2341&amp;category=main&quot;&gt;Neowin.net&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13670</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 15:07:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>burningmusic</category>
		<category>CDs</category>
		<category>copyprotection</category>
		<category>copyright</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>Philips</category>
		<category>piracy</category>
		<category>pirating</category>
		<category>RIAA</category>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


