<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with politicalblogs</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/politicalblogs</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'politicalblogs' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:39:30 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:39:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>New on the Web: Politics As Usual ?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56841/New%2Don%2Dthe%2DWeb%2DPolitics%2DAs%2DUsual</link>
		<description> Remember when folks were &quot;up-in-arms&quot; after learning that the Bush administration &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-06-williams-whitehouse_x.htm&quot;&gt;paid&lt;/a&gt; prominent political commentator &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrong_Williams&quot;&gt;Armstrong Williams&lt;/a&gt; $240,000 to promote &apos;No Child Left Behind&apos; legislation? It turns out that a handful of liberal bloggers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/opinion/03glover.html?_r=1&amp;bl&amp;ex=1165381200&amp;en=63203d0fe154016b&amp;ei=5087%0A&amp;oref=slogin&quot;&gt;pulled in some decent cash&lt;/a&gt; this past year from various political campaigns as consultants, while maintaining their &quot;independent&quot; blogs. Case in point: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_Armstrong&quot;&gt;Jerome Armstrong&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mydd.com/&quot;&gt;MyDD&lt;/a&gt;) made $115,000+ from Sherrod Brown (over 15 months) and $65,000 from Mark Warner (over 12 months). Turns out Armstrong &lt;a href=&quot;http://blueincolorado.mydd.com/story/2006/12/3/131910/920&quot;&gt;admitted&lt;/a&gt; this week that he has been writing on his blog under various aliases -- including &apos;Scott Shields.&apos; &apos;Shields&apos; &lt;a href=&quot;http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/12/03/opinion/03opchart.gif&quot;&gt;received payments &lt;/a&gt;from the Robert Menendez campaign.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56841</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:39:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ArmstrongWilliams</category>
		<category>BeatThePress</category>
		<category>Blogosphere</category>
		<category>Blogs</category>
		<category>JeromeArmstrong</category>
		<category>Journalism</category>
		<category>MyDD</category>
		<category>NewYorkTimes</category>
		<category>pamphleteers</category>
		<category>PoliticalBlogs</category>
		<category>ScottShields</category>
		<category>WGBH</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Political blogging 101</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30999/Political%2Dblogging%2D101</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/archives/001430.html"&gt;It&apos;s an interesting week in British politics&lt;/a&gt; (and not just because of &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2003/david_kelly_inquiry/default.stm&quot;&gt;Hutton&lt;/a&gt;). On Tuesday evening, British MP (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3053137.stm&quot;&gt;noted&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/bloggerCon/stories/storyReader$40&quot;&gt;blogger&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/tom_watson_labour_mp.html&quot;&gt;Tom Watson&lt;/a&gt; raised the subject of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/31461.html&quot;&gt;RFID tags&lt;/a&gt; in a House of Commons debate (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmhansrd/cm040127/debtext/40127-39.htm#40127-39_time1&quot;&gt;text here&lt;/a&gt;) - as a result of being alerted to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,999866,00.html&quot;&gt;threat to civil liberties&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/archives/000782.html&quot;&gt;fellow bloggers&lt;/a&gt;. Indeed, he even talked about his website in the chamber. Can blogs continue to affect British democracy?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://bill.verity-networks.com/billslog/stuff/00000074.html&quot;&gt;Quite possibly&lt;/a&gt;...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30999</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:59:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>britishpolitics</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>civilliberties</category>
		<category>consumers</category>
		<category>davidkelly</category>
		<category>kellyenquiry</category>
		<category>loyaltycards</category>
		<category>politicalblogs</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>RFIDtags</category>
		<category>supermarkets</category>
		<category>tomwatson</category>
		<dc:creator>ascullion</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


